2.3 Integrated Delivery Systems

Integrated delivery systems combine various healthcare services under one unified system, aiming to improve care coordination and patient outcomes. These systems typically include hospitals, physician practices, and outpatient facilities, all connected through shared electronic health records and aligned financial incentives.

The benefits of integrated delivery systems include improved care continuity, enhanced patient experiences, and better management of chronic conditions. However, challenges such as provider resistance, technological hurdles, and regulatory barriers can complicate implementation. Successful examples like Kaiser Permanente showcase the potential for improved quality and cost savings.

Integrated Delivery Systems

Components of integrated delivery systems

Top images from around the web for Components of integrated delivery systems

• 

  Frontiers | Continuous Quality Improvement and Comprehensive Primary Health Care: A Systems ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  EMR vs EHR vs PHR « ed-informatics.org View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Continuous Quality Improvement and Comprehensive Primary Health Care: A Systems ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  EMR vs EHR vs PHR « ed-informatics.org View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Components of integrated delivery systems

• 

  Frontiers | Continuous Quality Improvement and Comprehensive Primary Health Care: A Systems ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  EMR vs EHR vs PHR « ed-informatics.org View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Continuous Quality Improvement and Comprehensive Primary Health Care: A Systems ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  EMR vs EHR vs PHR « ed-informatics.org View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Integrated delivery systems (IDSs) combine various healthcare services under one unified system including hospitals, physician practices, outpatient facilities, and other healthcare services
• Shared electronic health record (EHR) system enables seamless communication and data sharing among providers (Epic, Cerner)
• Coordinated care management across different healthcare settings ensures continuity of care for patients
• Aligned financial incentives promote quality and efficiency in healthcare delivery (value-based contracts, risk-sharing arrangements)
• Emphasis on preventive care and population health management helps manage chronic conditions and improve overall health outcomes

Benefits for care and costs

• Improved care coordination and continuity of care through streamlined referral processes and information sharing among providers reduces duplication of tests and procedures
• Enhanced patient experience and outcomes result from comprehensive, patient-centered care across the healthcare continuum (primary care, specialty care, hospital services)
• Better management of chronic conditions (diabetes, heart disease) and preventive care leads to improved health outcomes and reduced complications
• Increased efficiency and cost savings through elimination of redundant administrative processes and overhead costs
• Economies of scale in purchasing and resource utilization help control costs (bulk purchasing of supplies, shared IT infrastructure)
• Potential for value-based care delivery by aligning incentives to focus on quality and outcomes rather than volume of services
• Ability to manage population health and assume financial risk for patient care through capitated payments or shared savings arrangements

Challenges in implementation

• Resistance to change from healthcare providers and staff due to concerns about loss of autonomy and changes in work processes requires extensive training and change management efforts
• Technological challenges in integrating disparate health information systems, including interoperability issues among different EHR platforms (Epic, Cerner) and legacy systems, involve significant upfront costs for IT infrastructure and data integration
• Regulatory and legal barriers, such as antitrust concerns related to market consolidation and reduced competition, require compliance with federal and state regulations on data privacy and security (HIPAA, state privacy laws)
• Financial challenges and risks include high startup costs for acquiring and integrating healthcare facilities and practices and uncertainty in managing financial risk for population health and value-based contracts

Examples of successful systems

• Kaiser Permanente, a fully integrated system with health plan, hospitals, and physician groups, emphasizes preventive care, care coordination, and population health management and consistently ranks high in quality measures and patient satisfaction
• Geisinger Health System, an integrated system in Pennsylvania with hospitals, clinics, and health plan, pioneered innovative care models, such as ProvenCare bundled payments, demonstrating improvements in quality and cost savings through care redesign efforts
• Intermountain Healthcare, a nonprofit integrated system in Utah and Idaho with hospitals, clinics, and health plans, leads in using data analytics and evidence-based protocols to improve care quality and has developed successful care management programs for chronic conditions (diabetes, heart failure) and mental health