2.2 Prisoner's Dilemma and Nash Equilibrium

Game theory sheds light on strategic decision-making in negotiations. The Prisoner's Dilemma and Nash Equilibrium show how individual choices can lead to suboptimal outcomes for all involved.

These concepts reveal the tension between self-interest and collective benefit. Understanding them helps negotiators navigate complex situations, balancing cooperation and competition to achieve better results.

Game Theory Fundamentals

Prisoner's Dilemma and Nash Equilibrium

Top images from around the web for Prisoner's Dilemma and Nash Equilibrium

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Prisoner’s Dilemma | Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Prisoner’s Dilemma | Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Prisoner's Dilemma and Nash Equilibrium

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Prisoner’s Dilemma | Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Nash equilibrium - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Prisoner’s Dilemma | Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Prisoner's Dilemma represents a scenario where two individuals must decide whether to cooperate or betray each other
• Demonstrates conflict between individual and collective interests
• Outcomes depend on choices made by both parties simultaneously
• Nash Equilibrium occurs when neither player can unilaterally improve their outcome by changing strategy
  • In Prisoner's Dilemma, mutual defection often constitutes Nash Equilibrium
• Dominant strategy equilibrium emerges when each player has a strategy that yields the best outcome regardless of opponent's choice
  • In classic Prisoner's Dilemma, defection typically serves as dominant strategy
• Pareto optimality describes a situation where no player can be made better off without making another worse off
  • Mutual cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma often achieves Pareto optimality

Applications and Implications

• Game theory applies to various fields (economics, politics, biology)
• Helps analyze strategic decision-making in competitive environments
• Reveals paradoxes between rational individual choices and collective outcomes
• Provides insights into conflict resolution and cooperation dynamics
• Illustrates importance of trust, communication, and reputation in strategic interactions
• Highlights challenges in achieving mutually beneficial outcomes in competitive situations

Strategic Choices

Cooperation and Its Benefits

• Cooperation involves working together for mutual benefit
• Can lead to better collective outcomes and higher overall payoffs
• Requires trust and communication between parties
• May involve risk-taking and vulnerability
• Examples of cooperation include:
  • Resource sharing in business partnerships
  • International agreements on climate change
• Benefits of cooperation:
  • Increased efficiency and productivity
  • Access to shared resources and expertise
  • Enhanced problem-solving capabilities
  • Potential for long-term relationship building

Defection and Its Consequences

• Defection entails acting in self-interest at the expense of others
• Can lead to short-term individual gains but often results in suboptimal collective outcomes
• May damage trust and future cooperation opportunities
• Examples of defection include:
  • Breaking agreements in business negotiations
  • Violating international treaties
• Consequences of defection:
  • Retaliation from other parties
  • Breakdown of trust and relationships
  • Missed opportunities for future collaboration
  • Potential for escalating conflicts

Repeated Interactions

Iterated Games and Long-Term Strategies

• Iterated games involve repeated interactions between players over time
• Differ from one-shot games by allowing for strategy adaptation and reputation building
• Players can learn from past interactions and adjust their behavior
• Strategies in iterated games may include:
  • Tit-for-tat (reciprocating opponent's previous move)
  • Forgiveness (occasional cooperation despite past defections)
  • Gradual (starting cooperatively and adjusting based on opponent's behavior)
• Long-term considerations become more important in iterated games
  • Building trust and reputation can lead to sustained cooperation
  • Short-term gains from defection may be outweighed by future losses

Implications of Repeated Interactions

• Repeated interactions can foster cooperation even in Prisoner's Dilemma-like situations
• Allow for development of more complex and nuanced strategies
• Emphasize importance of reputation and credibility in negotiations
• Create opportunities for learning and adaptation in strategic decision-making
• Highlight role of communication and signaling in shaping outcomes
• Demonstrate how long-term thinking can lead to more stable and mutually beneficial equilibria