In rem and are crucial concepts in civil procedure. They allow courts to exercise power over property, either to determine rights in the property itself or to satisfy claims against individuals. These forms of jurisdiction complement , expanding courts' reach.
Understanding the distinctions between in rem and quasi in rem is key. In rem affects all interests in property, while quasi in rem is limited to the defendant's interest. Both face constitutional scrutiny, with quasi significantly limited by the decision requiring .
In Rem Jurisdiction
Definition and Application
Top images from around the web for Definition and Application
USMS Asset Forfeiture poster | One of several mission specif… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Law and Jurisdiction | Texas Government 1.0 View original
Is this image relevant?
U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
USMS Asset Forfeiture poster | One of several mission specif… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Law and Jurisdiction | Texas Government 1.0 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Definition and Application
USMS Asset Forfeiture poster | One of several mission specif… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Law and Jurisdiction | Texas Government 1.0 View original
Is this image relevant?
U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
USMS Asset Forfeiture poster | One of several mission specif… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Law and Jurisdiction | Texas Government 1.0 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
In rem jurisdiction empowers courts to adjudicate rights over specific property within their territorial jurisdiction
Based on property presence rather than personal jurisdiction over parties
Binding on all parties with property interest, even without personal service
Typically used in real property disputes, maritime law, and asset forfeiture proceedings
Allows courts to settle title disputes, enforce , or determine ownership rights
Examples include foreclosure proceedings (mortgage lenders) or admiralty cases (salvage rights)
Key Characteristics
Focuses on the property itself, not personal claims against individuals
extends to the entire property value, not limited by defendant's equity
Judgment affects property rights directly (transfer of title, sale of property)
Notice requirements less stringent than in personam cases (publication may suffice)
Property must have sufficient connection to forum state (minimum contacts test)
In Rem vs Quasi In Rem Jurisdiction
Quasi In Rem Jurisdiction Overview
Allows courts to adjudicate rights over defendant's property within territorial jurisdiction
Used to resolve claims against defendant personally, not about property rights
Divided into two types:
Type I: Pre-existing claims related to the property (mechanic's lien)
Type II: Using unrelated property to satisfy claim against defendant (attaching bank account for unrelated debt)
Court's power limited to property value, unlike in rem affecting property rights
Significantly limited by Shaffer v. Heitner decision (minimum contacts standard)
Key Differences
Purpose: In rem determines property rights, quasi in rem resolves personal claims
Scope: In rem affects all interests in property, quasi in rem limited to defendant's interest
Judgment: In rem binds all parties, quasi in rem only binds named parties
Constitutional scrutiny: Quasi in rem faces stricter due process requirements
Examples:
In rem: Quiet title action for disputed land ownership
Quasi in rem: Attaching non-resident's local bank account for out-of-state car accident claim
Property Subject to In Rem Jurisdiction
Real and Tangible Property
Real property (land, buildings) most common for in rem jurisdiction
Tangible personal property subject to both in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction
Vehicles (cars, boats)
Valuable items (jewelry, artwork)
Location within court's territorial jurisdiction crucial for establishing jurisdiction
Examples:
Foreclosure on a house (in rem)
Seizing a yacht for maritime lien (in rem)
Attaching a valuable painting to satisfy unrelated debt (quasi in rem)
Intangible and Emerging Property Types
Intangible property subject to quasi in rem jurisdiction through or garnishment
Bank accounts
Stocks and bonds
Insurance policies
Intellectual property rights may be subject to in rem jurisdiction in specialized proceedings
Patent infringement cases
Trademark disputes
Virtual assets emerging as new frontier for in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction
Domain names (cybersquatting cases)
Cryptocurrency wallets
Examples:
Garnishing wages for child support (quasi in rem)
In rem proceeding against infringing domain name under ACPA
Constitutional Limits on In Rem Jurisdiction
Due Process Requirements
Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause limits in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction
Shaffer v. Heitner (1977) established minimum contacts test for all state-court jurisdiction
In rem jurisdiction: Property presence may satisfy due process if subject of litigation
Quasi in rem jurisdiction faces stricter scrutiny, especially Type II cases
Courts consider factors:
Nature and quality of defendant's contacts with forum state
Relationship between property and litigation
State's interest in adjudicating dispute
Examples:
Sufficient: Foreclosure on in-state property
Insufficient: Attaching unrelated property for out-of-state tort claim
Notice and Enforcement
Notice and opportunity to be heard fundamental due process requirements
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. established notice standards
Reasonable efforts to provide actual notice required
Publication notice may suffice for unknown parties in in rem cases
Full Faith and Credit Clause requires interstate recognition of valid judgments
Limited exceptions (fraud, lack of jurisdiction)
Examples:
Sufficient notice: Certified mail to property owner's last known address
Insufficient notice: Mere publication for known defendant in quasi in rem case