You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides3.3 Intergovernmental Relationships
3 min read•june 25, 2024
Federal grants have evolved from limited funding in early America to complex programs shaping modern . These grants, ranging from specific to flexible , significantly impact state and local governments' finances and policies.
in the U.S. involve intricate interactions between federal, state, and local governments. This system of distributes powers and responsibilities, influencing policy implementation and resource allocation across all levels of government.
Evolution and Types of Federal Intergovernmental Grants
Evolution of federal intergovernmental grants
Top images from around the web for Evolution of federal intergovernmental grants
Federalism: How should power be structurally divided? | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Intergovernmental Relationships | American Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Federalism: Basic Structure of Government | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Federalism: How should power be structurally divided? | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Intergovernmental Relationships | American Government View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Evolution of federal intergovernmental grants
Federalism: How should power be structurally divided? | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Intergovernmental Relationships | American Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Federalism: Basic Structure of Government | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Federalism: How should power be structurally divided? | United States Government View original
Is this image relevant?
Intergovernmental Relationships | American Government View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- era (1789-1932) featured limited federal grants to states primarily for land (), transportation (), and education ()
- era (1932-1960s) expanded federal grants during the () and post-World War II for specific purposes such as public housing ( of 1949) and highway construction ( of 1956)
- era (1960s-1980s) further expanded federal grants especially for social welfare programs (), introduced block grants giving states more flexibility in spending (), and revenue sharing programs providing states with funds for general purposes ( of 1972)
- era (1980s-present) aimed to reduce federal grants and devolve power to states through welfare reform () giving states more control over welfare programs while continuing use of block grants () and categorical grants ()
- This era also saw increased emphasis on , transferring certain powers and responsibilities from the federal government to state and local governments
Types of federal grants
- Categorical grants provide funds for specific narrowly defined purposes with strict federal oversight and requirements (Medicaid, education grants, Federal Transit Administration grants)
- Block grants offer funds for broader more flexible purposes within a general policy area with less federal oversight and more state discretion (Community Development Block Grant, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families)
- allocate funds based on a predetermined formula often using population or poverty rates and can be used for both categorical (Title I education grants) and block grants ()
- are awarded on a competitive basis for specific projects often requiring grant proposals and applications ( research grants, Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery grants)
- provide federal funds that require state or local governments to contribute a portion of the cost encouraging investment in federal priorities and can be used with categorical (Medicaid), block (Community Services Block Grant), or project grants ( grants)
Impact of unfunded mandates
- are federal requirements for state and local governments without providing full federal funding (, )
- Increased financial burden as states and localities must allocate own resources to comply with mandates straining budgets and limiting funding for other priorities (special education costs under )
- Reduced state and local autonomy as federal mandates can override state and local policies and preferences limiting ability to tailor policies to specific needs ( requirements for driver's licenses)
- Compliance costs for implementing and administering federal mandates can be costly and time-consuming requiring additional staff training and resources ( regulations)
- of state and local authority as some federal mandates may preempt state and local laws and regulations creating conflicts and challenges ( preemption of local zoning for 5G infrastructure)
- (UMRA) of 1995 requires Congress to estimate costs of mandates and provide funding if costs exceed a certain threshold aiming to limit unfunded mandates and increase transparency but has had limited impact due to exemptions and loopholes
Intergovernmental Relations and Federalism
- Intergovernmental relations encompass the complex interactions and relationships between different levels of government in a federal system
- Fiscal federalism refers to the financial relationships between levels of government, including the distribution of taxing and spending powers
- describes the relationships between the federal government and state/local governments, including grants, mandates, and regulatory oversight
- involves relationships between states, including interstate compacts and full faith and credit
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
