3.6 Anomaly-based detection

Anomaly-based detection identifies unusual patterns in network traffic, system logs, and user activities. By spotting deviations from normal behavior, it can catch new or unknown threats that signature-based methods might miss.

This approach uses statistical models, expert knowledge, and machine learning to define normal behavior and flag anomalies. It's adaptable to evolving threats but faces challenges like concept drift and detecting stealthy attacks.

Types of anomaly-based detection

• Anomaly-based detection identifies deviations from normal behavior in network traffic, system logs, or user activities
• Enables the detection of previously unknown or zero-day attacks that signature-based methods may miss
• Three main categories of anomaly-based detection techniques: statistical-based, knowledge-based, and machine learning-based

Statistical-based anomaly detection

Top images from around the web for Statistical-based anomaly detection

• 

  Frontiers | EvAn: Neuromorphic Event-Based Sparse Anomaly Detection View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Time Series Analysis View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Feature relevance XAI in anomaly detection: Reviewing approaches and challenges View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | EvAn: Neuromorphic Event-Based Sparse Anomaly Detection View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Time Series Analysis View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Statistical-based anomaly detection

• 

  Frontiers | EvAn: Neuromorphic Event-Based Sparse Anomaly Detection View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Time Series Analysis View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Feature relevance XAI in anomaly detection: Reviewing approaches and challenges View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | EvAn: Neuromorphic Event-Based Sparse Anomaly Detection View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Time Series Analysis View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Relies on statistical models and probabilistic methods to identify anomalies
• Assumes that normal behavior follows a particular statistical distribution (Gaussian, Poisson)
• Detects anomalies as deviations from the expected statistical properties of the data
• Examples include threshold-based methods and time series analysis

Knowledge-based anomaly detection

• Incorporates domain knowledge and expert rules to define normal behavior
• Uses predefined specifications, state machines, or expert systems to model expected behavior
• Identifies anomalies as violations of the established rules or deviations from the defined specifications
• Suitable for well-understood systems with clear behavioral expectations

Machine learning-based anomaly detection

• Employs machine learning algorithms to learn patterns of normal behavior from historical data
• Detects anomalies as deviations from the learned patterns or models
• Can adapt to evolving threats and changing network environments
• Examples include clustering, classification, and deep learning techniques

Statistical-based anomaly detection

• Utilizes statistical models and probabilistic methods to identify anomalies in network traffic or system behavior
• Assumes that normal behavior follows a specific statistical distribution and detects deviations from it
• Encompasses various approaches, including univariate and multivariate models, parametric and non-parametric methods

Univariate vs multivariate models

• Univariate models consider a single variable or feature at a time (packet size, inter-arrival time)
• Multivariate models analyze multiple variables simultaneously to capture dependencies and correlations
• Multivariate models can detect more complex anomalies but are computationally more expensive

Parametric vs non-parametric approaches

• Parametric methods assume the data follows a known probability distribution (Gaussian, Poisson) with fixed parameters
• Non-parametric methods make no assumptions about the underlying distribution and estimate it from the data
• Parametric methods are more efficient but less flexible, while non-parametric methods are more robust but computationally intensive

Challenges of statistical methods

• Selecting appropriate statistical models and distributions that accurately represent normal behavior
• Determining suitable thresholds for anomaly detection without generating excessive false positives or false negatives
• Handling high-dimensional and heterogeneous data with complex dependencies and correlations
• Adapting to evolving network environments and changing traffic patterns over time

Knowledge-based anomaly detection

• Leverages domain knowledge and expert rules to define normal behavior and identify anomalies
• Incorporates human expertise and system-specific information to create accurate behavioral models
• Suitable for well-understood systems with predictable behavior and clear security policies

Expert systems for anomaly detection

• Use a knowledge base of rules and heuristics to encode expert knowledge about normal behavior
• Employ inference engines to reason about the observed data and detect deviations from the defined rules
• Can incorporate complex decision-making processes and handle domain-specific anomalies
• Require significant effort to acquire and maintain the knowledge base and rules

Finite state machines in anomaly detection

• Model the expected behavior of a system or protocol as a finite state machine (FSM)
• Define the valid states and transitions based on the system specifications or observed patterns
• Detect anomalies as deviations from the expected state transitions or violations of the FSM model
• Suitable for modeling sequential and stateful behavior (network protocols, system calls)

Specification-based anomaly detection

• Uses formal specifications to define the expected behavior of a system or application
• Specifies the allowed inputs, outputs, and state transitions using mathematical or logical formalisms
• Detects anomalies as violations of the specified behavior or invariants
• Provides a rigorous and verifiable approach to anomaly detection but requires detailed specifications

Machine learning-based anomaly detection

• Applies machine learning algorithms to learn patterns of normal behavior from historical data
• Detects anomalies as deviations from the learned patterns or models without explicit programming
• Can adapt to evolving threats and changing network environments by continuously learning from new data

Supervised vs unsupervised learning

• Supervised learning uses labeled data with known anomalies to train classification models
• Unsupervised learning identifies anomalies without labeled data by clustering or density estimation
• Semi-supervised learning combines a small amount of labeled data with a large amount of unlabeled data

Common ML algorithms for anomaly detection

• Clustering algorithms (k-means, DBSCAN) group similar instances and identify outliers as anomalies
• One-class classification (One-Class SVM, Isolation Forest) learns a boundary around normal instances
• Autoencoders and generative models (VAE, GAN) learn to reconstruct normal data and detect anomalies as reconstruction errors
• Sequence models (LSTM, HMM) learn temporal patterns and detect anomalies in time series data

Feature selection and engineering

• Identifies the most relevant and discriminative features for anomaly detection
• Removes redundant or irrelevant features to improve detection accuracy and efficiency
• Engineers new features by combining or transforming existing features to capture domain-specific patterns
• Applies dimensionality reduction techniques (PCA, t-SNE) to visualize and analyze high-dimensional data

Evaluating anomaly detection systems

• Assessing the performance and effectiveness of anomaly detection systems is crucial for their deployment and improvement
• Involves measuring the system's ability to correctly identify anomalies while minimizing false alarms
• Requires appropriate metrics, testing methodologies, and benchmarking against known datasets or real-world scenarios

Metrics for anomaly detection performance

• True Positive Rate (TPR) or Recall: the proportion of actual anomalies that are correctly identified
• False Positive Rate (FPR): the proportion of normal instances that are incorrectly flagged as anomalies
• Precision: the proportion of identified anomalies that are actually true anomalies
• F1 Score: the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a balanced measure of overall performance
• Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC): summarizes the trade-off between TPR and FPR at different thresholds

False positives vs false negatives

• False positives occur when normal instances are incorrectly flagged as anomalies, leading to unnecessary alerts and investigations
• False negatives happen when actual anomalies are missed by the detection system, potentially allowing attacks to go unnoticed
• The relative costs and risks associated with false positives and false negatives depend on the specific application and security context
• Anomaly detection systems often need to strike a balance between minimizing false positives and false negatives based on the acceptable trade-offs

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves

• ROC curves visualize the performance of a binary classifier by plotting the TPR against the FPR at various threshold settings
• Provide a way to evaluate the anomaly detection system's ability to discriminate between normal and anomalous instances
• The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) is a single scalar value that summarizes the overall performance across all possible thresholds
• Higher AUROC values indicate better anomaly detection performance, with a value of 1 representing a perfect classifier

Challenges of anomaly-based detection

• Anomaly-based detection faces several challenges that can impact its effectiveness and practicality in real-world scenarios
• These challenges arise from the dynamic and complex nature of modern networks, the evolving threat landscape, and the inherent limitations of anomaly detection techniques

Handling concept drift and evolving threats

• Concept drift refers to the change in the underlying distribution of normal behavior over time due to system updates, network reconfigurations, or user behavior changes
• Anomaly detection models trained on historical data may become less effective as the normal behavior evolves, leading to increased false positives or false negatives
• Adversaries can exploit concept drift by gradually introducing malicious activities that blend into the changing normal behavior, making them harder to detect
• Adaptive anomaly detection techniques that can continuously learn and update their models are needed to handle concept drift and maintain detection accuracy

Detecting low-frequency and stealthy attacks

• Some sophisticated attacks, such as advanced persistent threats (APTs), may involve low-frequency and stealthy activities that blend in with normal behavior
• These attacks may span long periods and use techniques like mimicry, polymorphism, or obfuscation to evade detection
• Anomaly detection systems may struggle to identify such subtle and infrequent anomalies, especially if they rely on aggregated or coarse-grained data
• Detecting low-frequency attacks requires high-fidelity data collection, advanced behavioral analysis, and correlation across multiple data sources and time scales

Scalability and real-time detection requirements

• Modern networks generate massive volumes of high-velocity data from various sources, such as network traffic, system logs, and user activities
• Anomaly detection systems need to process and analyze this data in real-time or near-real-time to enable prompt detection and response to threats
• Scalability challenges arise from the need to handle large-scale data storage, efficient data processing, and timely anomaly detection on resource-constrained devices
• Distributed and parallel processing architectures, data reduction techniques, and edge computing paradigms are explored to address scalability and real-time detection requirements

Applications of anomaly-based detection

• Anomaly-based detection finds applications in various domains where identifying deviations from normal behavior is crucial for security, reliability, and efficiency
• These applications leverage the ability of anomaly detection techniques to uncover previously unknown or emerging threats and anomalies

Intrusion detection systems (IDS)

• Anomaly-based intrusion detection systems monitor network traffic and system activities to identify potential security breaches or malicious behavior
• They complement signature-based IDS by detecting novel attacks that may not have known signatures
• Network-based anomaly detection analyzes packet headers, payloads, and communication patterns to identify anomalous traffic
• Host-based anomaly detection monitors system calls, resource usage, and application behavior to detect anomalous activities on individual hosts

Fraud detection in financial systems

• Anomaly detection techniques are applied to identify fraudulent transactions, money laundering, and other financial crimes
• They analyze patterns in transaction data, user behavior, and account activities to detect deviations from normal financial behavior
• Anomaly detection can uncover novel fraud schemes and adapt to evolving fraud tactics
• Examples include detecting credit card fraud, insurance fraud, and insider trading

Anomaly detection in IoT and industrial control systems

• Internet of Things (IoT) devices and industrial control systems (ICS) are increasingly targeted by cyber attacks due to their critical nature and potential vulnerabilities
• Anomaly detection can identify unusual behavior, malicious activities, and operational anomalies in IoT and ICS environments
• It monitors sensor data, device communications, and control commands to detect deviations from expected patterns
• Anomaly detection helps ensure the security, reliability, and safety of IoT and ICS deployments in smart homes, smart cities, and industrial facilities