3.4 Ethical considerations in experimental designs

Experimental designs in impact evaluation require careful consideration of ethical principles. Researchers must balance scientific rigor with participant well-being, addressing issues like informed consent, vulnerability, and potential societal impacts. Ethical guidelines provide a framework for conducting responsible research.

Institutional Review Boards play a crucial role in ensuring ethical conduct. They review protocols, assess risks and benefits, and protect vulnerable populations. Researchers must navigate challenges like control group dilemmas, randomization fairness, and long-term implications while upholding ethical standards throughout their studies.

Ethical Principles for Impact Evaluation

Fundamental Ethical Guidelines

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Ethical Guidelines

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 1

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Ethical Guidelines

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 1

• Respect for persons, beneficence, and justice form the core ethical principles in impact evaluation outlined in the Belmont Report
• Declaration of Helsinki provides international ethical guidelines for medical research involving human subjects applicable to many impact evaluation contexts
• Equipoise principle requires genuine uncertainty about the relative merits of different treatments or interventions being compared in an experiment
• Ethical guidelines emphasize minimizing harm and maximizing benefits to participants and communities involved in experimental research
  • Example: Ensuring that control groups receive standard care rather than no treatment at all
  • Example: Providing post-study access to effective interventions for all participants

Vulnerability and Societal Considerations

• Concept of vulnerability in research ethics requires special protections for groups such as children, prisoners, or economically disadvantaged populations
  • Example: Additional safeguards for obtaining informed consent from minors
  • Example: Ensuring that incarcerated individuals are not coerced into participation
• Ethical considerations in impact evaluation extend beyond individual participants to include potential societal impacts and long-term consequences of interventions
  • Example: Assessing the environmental impact of agricultural interventions
  • Example: Considering the economic effects of microfinance programs on non-participants
• Researchers must balance scientific rigor with ethical obligations ensuring that experimental designs do not compromise participant well-being or violate ethical standards
  • Example: Adapting randomization procedures to ensure fair access to potentially beneficial interventions
  • Example: Implementing data monitoring committees to assess ongoing risks and benefits

Informed Consent and Privacy

Informed Consent Process

• Informed consent involves participants voluntarily confirming their willingness to participate in a study after being informed of all relevant aspects
• Elements of informed consent include disclosure of study purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, alternatives, and the right to withdraw at any time
  • Example: Providing a clear explanation of randomization procedures in clinical trials
  • Example: Discussing potential psychological risks in studies on sensitive topics
• Special considerations for informed consent may be necessary for vulnerable populations or in cross-cultural research settings
  • Example: Using culturally appropriate consent processes in indigenous communities
  • Example: Employing simplified consent forms for participants with low literacy levels

Data Privacy and Confidentiality

• Participant privacy refers to an individual's right to control access to their personal information and the circumstances under which they are observed or recorded during research
• Data confidentiality involves protecting participants' identifiable information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction
  • Example: Using secure, encrypted databases for storing participant information
  • Example: Implementing strict access controls for research team members
• Anonymization and de-identification techniques are crucial for maintaining participant privacy in data collection, analysis, and reporting
  • Example: Using unique identifiers instead of names in data sets
  • Example: Aggregating data to prevent individual identification in published results
• Researchers must develop and implement data management plans that address data security, storage, sharing, and destruction in accordance with ethical and legal requirements
  • Example: Establishing protocols for secure data transfer between research sites
  • Example: Creating schedules for data retention and destruction after study completion

Ethical Challenges in Human Experiments

Experimental Design Dilemmas

• Use of control groups may raise ethical concerns when withholding potentially beneficial interventions from certain participants
  • Example: Providing placebo treatments in medical trials for serious conditions
  • Example: Delaying educational interventions for control group students
• Randomization in experimental designs can present ethical dilemmas when it conflicts with principles of fairness or equal access to interventions
  • Example: Allocating limited resources in poverty alleviation programs
  • Example: Assigning participants to different treatment intensities in public health interventions
• Deception in research, while sometimes necessary for scientific validity, poses ethical challenges related to respect for participant autonomy and informed consent
  • Example: Using confederates in social psychology experiments
  • Example: Withholding full information about study objectives to prevent bias

Power Dynamics and Long-term Implications

• Power imbalances between researchers and participants can lead to ethical concerns about coercion or undue influence in recruitment and participation
  • Example: Offering excessive financial incentives in economically disadvantaged communities
  • Example: Conducting research in settings with hierarchical social structures
• Long-term follow-up studies may encounter ethical issues related to maintaining participant engagement and addressing unexpected findings or adverse events
  • Example: Managing incidental findings in longitudinal health studies
  • Example: Balancing participant autonomy with the need for continued data collection
• Ethical challenges may arise when research findings have potential negative consequences for participants or communities, such as stigmatization or economic impact
  • Example: Publishing results that could reinforce negative stereotypes about certain groups
  • Example: Revealing information that could affect property values in environmental studies
• Balancing scientific objectives with participant well-being can create ethical dilemmas, particularly in studies involving sensitive topics or potentially distressing experiences
  • Example: Conducting research on trauma survivors without causing re-traumatization
  • Example: Designing studies on illegal behaviors while protecting participants from legal consequences

Role of Institutional Review Boards

IRB Functions and Processes

• Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are committees responsible for reviewing and approving research involving human subjects to ensure ethical conduct and participant protection
• IRBs assess research protocols for compliance with ethical guidelines, regulatory requirements, and institutional policies
  • Example: Evaluating informed consent procedures for clarity and completeness
  • Example: Assessing risk-benefit ratios of proposed interventions
• Primary functions of IRBs include evaluating risks and benefits, ensuring adequate informed consent procedures, and protecting vulnerable populations
• IRB review processes typically involve initial review, continuing review, and review of modifications to approved research protocols
  • Example: Annual reviews of ongoing longitudinal studies
  • Example: Expedited review for minor protocol changes

IRB Authority and Researcher Responsibilities

• IRBs have the authority to approve, require modifications to, or disapprove research protocols based on ethical considerations and regulatory compliance
  • Example: Requesting changes to recruitment materials to avoid coercion
  • Example: Mandating additional safeguards for data protection in sensitive studies
• Researchers must submit detailed protocols, informed consent documents, and other relevant materials for IRB review prior to initiating experimental studies
  • Example: Providing sample survey instruments for IRB evaluation
  • Example: Submitting detailed data management plans for review
• IRBs play a crucial role in addressing emerging ethical issues in research, such as those related to big data, genetic studies, or international collaborations
  • Example: Developing guidelines for the ethical use of social media data in research
  • Example: Addressing ethical concerns in multi-site, cross-cultural studies