3.2 Framing and priming

Framing and priming shape how we perceive political issues. Framing highlights certain aspects, influencing our understanding, while priming activates specific ideas in our minds, affecting subsequent judgments. These concepts are crucial in understanding media's impact on public opinion.

Both techniques are powerful tools in political communication. Framing can alter the importance we assign to different aspects of an issue, while priming can make certain considerations more salient when forming opinions. Understanding these effects is key to critically analyzing media messages.

Framing vs Priming

Defining Framing and Priming

Top images from around the web for Defining Framing and Priming

• 

  Frontiers | “Wars” on COVID-19 in Slovakia, Russia, and the United States: Securitized Framing ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Democracy - Karnataka Open Educational Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | “Wars” on COVID-19 in Slovakia, Russia, and the United States: Securitized Framing ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Democracy - Karnataka Open Educational Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Defining Framing and Priming

• 

  Frontiers | “Wars” on COVID-19 in Slovakia, Russia, and the United States: Securitized Framing ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Democracy - Karnataka Open Educational Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | “Wars” on COVID-19 in Slovakia, Russia, and the United States: Securitized Framing ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Democracy - Karnataka Open Educational Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Framing selects and emphasizes certain aspects of an issue to promote a particular interpretation or evaluation
  • Frames influence how people think about and understand an issue
  • Examples of frames: economic consequences, moral implications, individual impacts
• Priming activates certain concepts or ideas in memory that influence subsequent judgments or behaviors
  • Priming makes certain considerations more salient when forming opinions
  • Examples of priming: mentioning a politician's stance on taxes before asking about their overall approval rating

Distinguishing Between Framing and Priming Effects

• Framing affects how an issue is understood and evaluated by shaping the lens through which it is viewed
  • Frames can alter the importance assigned to different considerations when forming opinions
  • Frames that resonate with existing beliefs or values tend to be more persuasive
• Priming affects the criteria or considerations used to make judgments about an issue
  • Priming can make certain issues or attributes more accessible in memory when evaluating political actors or policies
  • Priming effects are often temporary and dependent on the recency and frequency of exposure

Framing Techniques in Politics

Types of Frames Used in Political Communication

• Issue framing involves emphasizing specific aspects or dimensions of a policy issue
  • Economic consequences frame: focusing on the financial impacts of a policy proposal
  • Moral implications frame: highlighting the ethical or value-based considerations of an issue
  • Individual impacts frame: personalizing an issue by showcasing how it affects real people
• Equivalency framing presents logically equivalent information in different ways
  • Gain vs. loss framing: emphasizing the benefits of a policy vs. the costs of not adopting it
  • Risk vs. benefit framing: highlighting the potential dangers vs. the advantages of a course of action

Strategic and Conflict-Oriented Frames

• Episodic framing depicts issues through individual stories or specific events
  • Example: covering healthcare policy through the lens of one patient's struggle with medical bills
• Thematic framing presents issues in a broader context using general facts or statistics
  • Example: discussing healthcare policy by citing national data on insurance coverage and costs
• Strategic framing, often used in election coverage, focuses on political strategy, tactics, and performance rather than substantive policy issues
  • Horse race framing: emphasizing who is winning or losing in polls or fundraising
  • Game framing: portraying politics as a competitive sport with winners and losers
• Conflict framing emphasizes disagreement, diverging opinions, or clashes between individuals, groups, or institutions
  • Example: framing a legislative debate as a battle between two opposing parties

Framing's Impact on Opinion

Influencing Issue Attitudes and Policy Preferences

• Framing can influence issue attitudes by altering the importance individuals assign to different considerations when forming opinions
  • Example: framing gun control as a public safety issue vs. an individual rights issue
• Framing can affect policy preferences by highlighting certain consequences or outcomes of policy options
  • Frames that emphasize losses or risks tend to be more powerful than gain or benefit frames
  • Example: framing a social welfare program as preventing poverty vs. promoting dependency

Moderators of Framing Effects

• Framing can influence political participation and engagement
  • Frames that personalize issues or evoke emotional responses may mobilize individuals to take action
  • Example: framing climate change as a threat to future generations may inspire activism
• Framing effects are often moderated by individual characteristics, such as political knowledge, ideology, or personal experiences
  • Knowledgeable individuals may be less susceptible to framing effects
  • Frames that align with an individual's predispositions are more likely to resonate
  • Personal experiences with an issue can make frames more or less salient

Ethical Implications of Framing

Oversimplification and Exclusion of Perspectives

• Selective framing can oversimplify complex issues, obscuring important nuances or alternative perspectives
  • This may undermine informed public discourse by presenting a limited view of an issue
  • Example: framing immigration solely as a security threat vs. a multifaceted policy challenge
• Frames that align with elite or powerful interests may marginalize or exclude competing voices or viewpoints
  • This can exacerbate power imbalances in public debates by privileging dominant narratives
  • Example: framing a labor dispute from the perspective of management while ignoring worker concerns

Misrepresentation and Bias in News Coverage

• Episodic framing can obscure systemic causes or solutions to social problems by focusing on individual cases or anecdotes
  • This may lead to misguided policy responses that fail to address underlying issues
  • Example: framing poverty as a result of personal failings rather than structural inequalities
• Journalists' choice of frames may be influenced by professional norms, organizational pressures, or political biases
  • This can compromise objectivity and fairness in news coverage by promoting certain perspectives over others
  • Example: framing a protest as a riot vs. a legitimate expression of grievances
• Uncritical reliance on frames provided by political actors or interest groups may amplify strategic messaging or propaganda
  • This can erode journalistic independence and credibility by allowing outside actors to shape news narratives
  • Example: uncritically adopting the framing of a press release without providing additional context or scrutiny

Promoting Responsible Framing Practices

• Responsible framing practices require journalists to be aware of their own biases and actively seek out diverse perspectives
  • This involves critically examining the assumptions and implications of different frames
  • Journalists should strive to provide context and multiple angles to help audiences make informed judgments
• News organizations can promote responsible framing by encouraging journalists to:
  • Avoid oversimplification and reductionism in their reporting
  • Include voices and viewpoints from marginalized or affected communities
  • Provide historical and systemic context to help audiences understand complex issues
  • Clearly distinguish between facts and interpretation in their framing choices
  • Be transparent about their sources and any potential biases or limitations in their framing