Stacks and queues are essential data structures with two main implementations: array-based and linked list-based. Each approach has its pros and cons, affecting performance and memory usage in different scenarios.
Understanding these implementations is crucial for choosing the right structure for your needs. We'll compare array and linked list versions of stacks and queues, examining their advantages, disadvantages, and performance characteristics.
Array-based and Linked List-based Implementations of Stacks and Queues
Stacks with arrays vs linked lists
Top images from around the web for Stacks with arrays vs linked lists 《Data Structure And Algorithm Analysis In C++》读书笔记三_C/C++_sesiria的博客-CSDN博客 View original
Is this image relevant?
《Data Structure And Algorithm Analysis In C++》读书笔记三_C/C++_sesiria的博客-CSDN博客 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Stacks with arrays vs linked lists 《Data Structure And Algorithm Analysis In C++》读书笔记三_C/C++_sesiria的博客-CSDN博客 View original
Is this image relevant?
《Data Structure And Algorithm Analysis In C++》读书笔记三_C/C++_sesiria的博客-CSDN博客 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Array-based stack implementation
Utilizes a fixed-size array to store stack elements
Advantages
Straightforward implementation
Constant time (O ( 1 ) O(1) O ( 1 ) ) access to elements by index
Memory-efficient as no extra space needed for pointers
Disadvantages
Fixed size may lead to stack overflow if array is full
Inefficient memory use if stack size is unknown in advance
Linked list-based stack implementation
Utilizes a singly linked list to store stack elements
Advantages
Dynamic size allows stack to grow or shrink as needed
No stack overflow issues due to dynamic memory allocation
Efficient memory use as memory allocated only when required
Disadvantages
Extra memory overhead for storing pointers
Slightly slower element access compared to array-based
Queues with arrays vs linked lists
Array-based queue implementation
Utilizes a fixed-size array to store queue elements
Implements a circular queue for optimized space utilization
Advantages
Straightforward implementation
Constant time (O ( 1 ) O(1) O ( 1 ) ) access to elements by index
Memory-efficient as no extra space needed for pointers
Disadvantages
Fixed size may lead to queue overflow if array is full
Inefficient memory use if queue size is unknown in advance
Linked list-based queue implementation
Utilizes a singly linked list to store queue elements
Maintains pointers to the front and rear of the queue
Advantages
Dynamic size allows queue to grow or shrink as needed
No queue overflow issues due to dynamic memory allocation
Efficient memory use as memory allocated only when required
Disadvantages
Extra memory overhead for storing pointers
Slightly slower element access compared to array-based
Time complexity
Array-based stack and queue
Push /Enqueue operation: O ( 1 ) O(1) O ( 1 )
Pop /Dequeue operation: O ( 1 ) O(1) O ( 1 )
Linked list-based stack and queue
Push/Enqueue operation: O ( 1 ) O(1) O ( 1 )
Pop/Dequeue operation: O ( 1 ) O(1) O ( 1 )
Space complexity
Array-based stack and queue
Fixed size regardless of number of elements stored
May lead to inefficient memory use if size is unknown
Linked list-based stack and queue
Grows or shrinks dynamically based on number of elements
Requires extra memory for storing pointers
Error handling in stacks and queues
Empty stack or queue
Check if stack or queue is empty before pop or dequeue
Throw exception or return error message if not possible
Full stack or queue (array-based)
Check if stack or queue is full before push or enqueue
Throw exception or return error message if not possible
Null elements
Handle null elements based on application requirements
Allow null elements or throw exception if not permitted
Concurrent access
Implement synchronization (locks, semaphores) for thread safety
Prevent race conditions and ensure data consistency with multiple threads