3.2 Interpreting and Applying Statutory Language

Interpreting statutory language is a crucial skill in legal research. It involves understanding plain meaning, applying canons of construction, and resolving ambiguities. These techniques help lawyers and judges make sense of complex laws and apply them correctly.

Statutory interpretation doesn't happen in isolation. It's influenced by judicial decisions, administrative regulations, and legislative changes. Staying on top of amendments, repeals, and sunset provisions is key to grasping how laws evolve and impact real-world situations.

Statutory Interpretation Principles

The Plain Meaning Rule and Its Limitations

Top images from around the web for The Plain Meaning Rule and Its Limitations

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Committee Reports - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Committee Reports - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for The Plain Meaning Rule and Its Limitations

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Committee Reports - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  U. S. Courts: How do courts interpret contracts and laws? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Committee Reports - Federal Legislative History - Research Guides at Florida State University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• The plain meaning rule states that if the language of a statute is clear and unambiguous, it should be interpreted according to its plain and ordinary meaning
• Exception applies when following the plain meaning would lead to absurd results (manifest injustice, contradictions, or clearly unintended consequences)
• Courts may look beyond the plain meaning to consider context, purpose, and legislative history when the text is ambiguous or leads to absurd results

Canons of Construction for Interpreting Statutory Language

• The rule against surplusage suggests that every word and phrase in a statute should be given effect, and no part should be rendered superfluous or meaningless
  • Encourages courts to interpret statutes in a way that gives meaning to all provisions and avoids rendering any language redundant or unnecessary
• The ejusdem generis canon states that when a general term follows a list of specific terms, the general term should be interpreted to include only items of the same type as those listed (contracts, agreements, or other legal instruments)
• The noscitur a sociis canon suggests that the meaning of an ambiguous word or phrase should be determined by the words immediately surrounding it (in a series or enumeration)
• The expressio unius est exclusio alterius canon holds that the express mention of one thing excludes all others not mentioned
  • For example, if a statute lists specific exemptions to a rule, other exemptions are presumed to be excluded
• The in pari materia canon states that statutes dealing with the same subject matter should be interpreted harmoniously, if possible
  • Promotes consistency and coherence in the law by considering related statutes together
• The rule of lenity requires that ambiguity in a criminal statute be resolved in favor of the defendant
  • Reflects the principle that criminal laws should provide fair warning and be strictly construed against the government

Resolving Ambiguity in Statutes

Types of Statutory Ambiguity

• Semantic ambiguity occurs when a word or phrase has multiple meanings and it is unclear which meaning applies in the statutory context (the word "bank" could refer to a financial institution or the land alongside a river)
• Syntactic ambiguity arises when the structure of a sentence or provision allows for multiple interpretations (placement of modifiers or punctuation can create different readings)
• Contextual ambiguity happens when the meaning of a term is unclear in light of the surrounding statutory language or the broader legal context

Inconsistencies and Conflicts in Statutory Language

• Inconsistencies arise when different parts of a statute contradict each other or when a statute conflicts with other related statutes
  • Courts must attempt to reconcile apparent inconsistencies by considering the statute as a whole and harmonizing its provisions
• Conflicts can occur between state and federal statutes, between statutes and constitutional provisions, or between statutes and administrative regulations
  • Federal law generally preempts conflicting state law under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution
  • Statutes that conflict with constitutional provisions may be struck down as unconstitutional
  • Administrative regulations that conflict with statutes may be invalidated as exceeding the agency's authority

Tools for Resolving Ambiguity and Inconsistency

• Courts may employ various tools of statutory interpretation, such as legislative history, purpose, and context, to resolve ambiguities and inconsistencies
  • Legislative history includes committee reports, floor debates, and other materials that can shed light on the legislature's intent
  • The purpose of a statute, as gleaned from its text and legislative history, can guide interpretation when the language is unclear
  • The broader legal context, including related statutes and case law, can help clarify the meaning of ambiguous provisions
• The doctrine of implied repeal suggests that when two statutes conflict, the more recent statute prevails, but this is disfavored and courts will attempt to reconcile the statutes if possible
• The doctrine of constitutional avoidance encourages courts to interpret statutes in a way that avoids constitutional conflicts whenever possible
  • When a statute is susceptible to multiple interpretations, courts will prefer the interpretation that does not raise constitutional concerns

Statute, Interpretation, and Regulation

The Role of Judicial Interpretations

• Judicial interpretations of statutes, found in court opinions, can clarify ambiguities, resolve conflicts, and establish precedents that guide future application of the law
  • Lower courts are bound by the interpretations of higher courts in the same jurisdiction under the doctrine of stare decisis
• The doctrine of stare decisis requires courts to follow precedents set by higher courts and to generally adhere to their own prior decisions, promoting stability and predictability in the law
  • However, courts may overrule prior decisions when there are compelling reasons to do so, such as changes in social conditions or the recognition of a prior decision's unsoundness

The Interplay Between Statutes and Administrative Regulations

• Administrative agencies often issue regulations to implement and enforce statutes, which can provide more detailed guidance on statutory interpretation and application
  • Regulations are created through the notice-and-comment rulemaking process and have the force of law
• Courts generally defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency is charged with administering, known as Chevron deference
  • Under Chevron, courts first determine whether the statute is ambiguous, and if so, they defer to the agency's interpretation if it is reasonable
• However, courts may reject agency interpretations that conflict with the clear language of a statute or that exceed the agency's statutory authority
  • The Chevron framework is not applied when the agency's interpretation is contrary to the statute's plain meaning or when the agency is interpreting a statute it is not charged with administering

Navigating the Complex Legal Landscape

• The interplay between statutory text, judicial interpretations, and administrative regulations can create a complex and evolving legal landscape that requires careful analysis and research
  • Lawyers and legal professionals must stay up-to-date with changes in the law and be able to synthesize information from multiple sources
• Effective legal research involves not only locating relevant statutes, cases, and regulations but also understanding their relationships and the principles of interpretation that guide their application
  • Secondary sources, such as legal treatises and scholarly articles, can provide valuable insights and analysis to aid in this process

Statutory Change and Legal Application

The Impact of Statutory Amendments

• Statutory amendments modify existing statutes by adding, deleting, or changing language, which can significantly alter the meaning and scope of the law
  • Amendments may be in response to judicial interpretations that diverge from the legislature's intent or to address new issues that have arisen since the statute's enactment
• Amendments can be used to clarify ambiguities, address new issues, or respond to judicial interpretations that diverge from the legislature's intent
  • For example, Congress may amend a statute to overrule a court decision that interpreted the law in a way that was not intended by the legislature
• Researchers must carefully examine the language of amendments and consider their impact on the statute as a whole
  • This involves comparing the amended language to the original statute and understanding how the changes affect the law's meaning and application

The Effect of Repeals and the General Savings Statute

• Repeals occur when a legislature abrogates an existing statute, either expressly or by implication, rendering the statute no longer in force
  • Express repeals occur when a new statute explicitly states that it is repealing an existing law
  • Implied repeals happen when a new statute conflicts with an existing law to such an extent that the two cannot be reconciled
• The general savings statute (1 U.S.C. § 109) provides that the repeal of a criminal statute does not extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under the repealed statute, unless the repealing act expressly provides otherwise
  • This means that crimes committed before the repeal can still be prosecuted and punished under the repealed statute
• Researchers must be aware of any repeals that may affect the statutes they are working with and understand the implications of the general savings statute for criminal law

Sunset Provisions and Temporary Legislation

• Sunset provisions specify a date or event upon which a statute will automatically expire, unless the legislature takes action to extend or reauthorize the law
  • These provisions are often used for laws that are experimental, controversial, or designed to address temporary needs
• Sunset provisions allow for periodic review and reconsideration of a law's necessity and effectiveness
  • The legislature must affirmatively act to extend the law before its expiration date, providing an opportunity for debate and amendment
• Researchers must be attentive to sunset provisions and understand the temporal scope of the statutes they are analyzing
  • It is important to determine whether a statute with a sunset provision has been reauthorized or has expired and to consider the implications for the law's application