3.2 Negotiation Styles Across Cultures

Negotiation styles vary widely across cultures, influencing how deals are made globally. From distributive to integrative approaches, face-saving tactics to power dynamics, understanding these differences is crucial for successful international negotiations.

Time orientation, communication styles, and emotional expressiveness also play key roles in cross-cultural negotiations. Recognizing these cultural nuances helps negotiators adapt their strategies and avoid misunderstandings in diverse business settings.

Negotiation Approaches

Distributive and Integrative Negotiation

Top images from around the web for Distributive and Integrative Negotiation

• 

  Conflict Management Styles | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  BUS403: Negotiations and Conflict Management, Topic: 3.1: Distributive Negotiation | Saylor Academy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Negotiation | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Conflict Management Styles | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  BUS403: Negotiations and Conflict Management, Topic: 3.1: Distributive Negotiation | Saylor Academy View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Distributive and Integrative Negotiation

• 

  Conflict Management Styles | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  BUS403: Negotiations and Conflict Management, Topic: 3.1: Distributive Negotiation | Saylor Academy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Negotiation | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Conflict Management Styles | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  BUS403: Negotiations and Conflict Management, Topic: 3.1: Distributive Negotiation | Saylor Academy View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Distributive negotiation involves parties competing over a fixed amount of value to claim the largest share possible
• Also known as a zero-sum game or win-lose approach because one party's gains come at the expense of the other party's losses
• Integrative negotiation aims to create value and find win-win solutions that benefit both parties
• Focuses on identifying shared interests, exchanging information, and making tradeoffs to reach mutually beneficial agreements (win-win approach)

Face-Saving in Negotiations

• Face-saving refers to protecting one's reputation, credibility, and dignity during negotiations
• Particularly important in high-context cultures (East Asia) where reputation and relationships are highly valued
• Negotiators may use indirect communication, avoid direct confrontation, and allow the other party to save face
• Making concessions or admitting mistakes can cause a loss of face, so negotiators may resist compromise to maintain their reputation

Cultural Dimensions in Negotiations

Power Distance and Individualism vs. Collectivism

• Power distance refers to the extent to which less powerful members of a society accept and expect power to be distributed unequally
• High power distance cultures (China, Mexico) may have more formal, hierarchical negotiations with deference to authority figures
• Low power distance cultures (Germany, Sweden) may have more egalitarian, participative negotiations
• Individualist cultures (U.S., Canada) prioritize individual goals, direct communication, and quick decisions in negotiations
• Collectivist cultures (Japan, South Korea) prioritize group harmony, indirect communication, and consensus-building in negotiations

Time Orientation and Its Impact

• Time orientation refers to a culture's attitude towards time and the importance placed on past, present, or future
• Monochronic cultures (Germany, U.S.) view time as linear, value punctuality, and focus on one task at a time in negotiations
• Polychronic cultures (Brazil, India) view time as flexible, value relationships over schedules, and juggle multiple tasks in negotiations
• Long-term oriented cultures (China, Japan) take a future-focused, patient approach to negotiations and value long-term relationships
• Short-term oriented cultures (U.S., Canada) prioritize quick results and may be more focused on immediate gains in negotiations

Communication Styles in Negotiations

Direct vs. Indirect Communication

• Direct communication involves explicit, straightforward messages where the speaker's intentions are clear from their words
• Common in low-context, individualist cultures (Germany, Israel) where communication is direct and contracts are explicit
• Indirect communication involves implicit, subtle messages where the speaker's intentions must be inferred from context
• Common in high-context, collectivist cultures (Japan, Saudi Arabia) where communication is indirect and agreements are implicit
• Misunderstandings can occur when negotiators have different expectations for direct vs. indirect communication

Emotional Expressiveness and Its Variations

• Emotional expressiveness refers to the degree to which people display their emotions openly in negotiations
• Cultures with high emotional expressiveness (Latin America, Arab countries) may use expressive body language, facial expressions, and vocal tones
• Emotive negotiators may use passion, argue forcefully, or show anger to convey their point
• Cultures with low emotional expressiveness (East Asia, Northern Europe) may conceal their feelings and remain emotionally neutral
• Emotionally restrained negotiators may remain calm, use monotone voices, and avoid grand gestures
• Clashes can occur when expressive negotiators perceive neutral ones as cold and neutral negotiators perceive expressive ones as dramatic