3.2 Non-invasive recording methods (EEG, MEG, fMRI)

Non-invasive brain recording methods like EEG, MEG, and fMRI offer unique insights into neural activity. Each technique has distinct advantages in temporal or spatial resolution, allowing researchers to capture different aspects of brain function without invasive procedures.

These methods play crucial roles in neuroprosthetic research. EEG and MEG provide real-time data for device control, while fMRI offers precise brain mapping. Choosing the right technique depends on specific needs like portability, speed, or detailed imaging.

Principles and Techniques of Non-Invasive Recording Methods

EEG, MEG, and fMRI comparison

Top images from around the web for EEG, MEG, and fMRI comparison

• 

  Frontiers | Multimodal Classification of Schizophrenia Patients with MEG and fMRI Data Using ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Sensor Level Functional Connectivity Topography Comparison Between Different ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Multimodal Classification of Schizophrenia Patients with MEG and fMRI Data Using ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Multimodal Classification of Schizophrenia Patients with MEG and fMRI Data Using ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Sensor Level Functional Connectivity Topography Comparison Between Different ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for EEG, MEG, and fMRI comparison

• 

  Frontiers | Multimodal Classification of Schizophrenia Patients with MEG and fMRI Data Using ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Sensor Level Functional Connectivity Topography Comparison Between Different ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Multimodal Classification of Schizophrenia Patients with MEG and fMRI Data Using ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Multimodal Classification of Schizophrenia Patients with MEG and fMRI Data Using ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Sensor Level Functional Connectivity Topography Comparison Between Different ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• EEG (Electroencephalography)
  • Records electrical activity of the brain via electrodes placed on the scalp
  • Reflects synchronized activity of large neuron populations
  • Temporal resolution in millisecond range captures fast neural dynamics
  • Spatial resolution in centimeter range limits ability to localize specific brain regions
  • Relatively inexpensive and portable setup (cap with electrodes)
• MEG (Magnetoencephalography)
  • Detects magnetic fields generated by electrical brain activity using sensitive magnetometers
  • Measures synchronized activity of large neuron populations
  • Temporal resolution in millisecond range captures rapid changes in neural activity
  • Spatial resolution in millimeter range allows more precise localization of brain activity
  • Requires expensive and bulky equipment not typically portable (shielded room, superconducting sensors)
• fMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
  • Measures changes in blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal reflecting neural activity
  • Relies on hemodynamic response as an indirect measure of neural activity
  • Temporal resolution in second range limited by slow hemodynamic response
  • Spatial resolution in millimeter range provides high-resolution images of brain activity
  • Requires expensive and non-portable equipment (MRI scanner, strong magnetic field)

Resolution of recording methods

• Spatial resolution
  • EEG in centimeter range limits ability to localize specific brain regions
  • MEG in millimeter range allows more precise localization of brain activity
  • fMRI in millimeter range provides high spatial resolution images of brain activity
• Temporal resolution
  • EEG in millisecond range enables capture of fast neural dynamics
  • MEG in millisecond range captures rapid changes in neural activity
  • fMRI in second range limited by slow hemodynamic response
• Implications for neuroprosthetic applications
  • High temporal resolution (EEG and MEG) crucial for real-time control of neuroprosthetic devices
  • High spatial resolution (MEG and fMRI) important for precise mapping and targeting of specific brain regions
  • Choice of recording method depends on specific requirements (portability, real-time control, high spatial resolution)

Advantages and Limitations of Non-Invasive Recording Methods

Advantages of non-invasive techniques

• Non-invasive nature eliminates risks associated with invasive procedures (infection, tissue damage)
• Suitable for long-term use and repeated measurements
• Can be used in wider range of populations (healthy individuals, patients with contraindications for invasive procedures)

Applications in neuroprosthetic research

• Consider specific requirements of neuroprosthetic application
  1. Real-time control: Prioritize methods with high temporal resolution (EEG or MEG)
  2. Precise targeting of brain regions: Choose methods with high spatial resolution (MEG or fMRI)
  3. Portability and long-term use: Opt for EEG (relatively inexpensive and portable)
• Combine multiple non-invasive recording methods to leverage complementary strengths
  • Use fMRI to identify target brain regions and EEG for real-time control of neuroprosthetic device
• Develop experimental protocols that minimize artifacts and optimize signal quality
  • Apply appropriate filtering and preprocessing techniques to remove artifacts
  • Employ shielding and noise-cancellation methods to reduce external interference
• Validate experimental setup using appropriate control conditions and performance metrics
  • Compare performance of neuroprosthetic device using different recording methods
  • Assess reliability and robustness of system under various conditions