First-order logic proof systems build on propositional logic, adding quantifiers and predicates. and are two key approaches, using inference rules to construct proofs. These systems handle quantifiers through special introduction and elimination rules.
systems offer another proof method, using schemas as templates for generating axioms. bridges first-order and propositional logic, while techniques like enable computer-assisted proof discovery in first-order logic.
Natural Deduction and Sequent Calculus
Inference Rules and Proof Systems
Top images from around the web for Inference Rules and Proof Systems
logic - Natural deduction proof of $\forall x (\exists y (P(x) \vee Q(y))) \vdash \exists y ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Natural deduction is a proof system that uses a set of inference rules to derive conclusions from premises
Consists of introduction and elimination rules for each logical connective
Allows for the construction of proofs in a way that closely resembles human reasoning (, )
Sequent calculus is another proof system that operates on sequents, which are expressions of the form Γ⊢Δ
Γ represents a set of formulas called the antecedent, and Δ represents a set of formulas called the succedent
Sequent calculus rules manipulate these sequents to prove the validity of logical arguments
Inference rules in both systems specify how to derive new formulas from existing ones
Examples include ∧-introduction, ∨-elimination, →-introduction, and ¬-introduction
Quantifier Rules in Natural Deduction and Sequent Calculus
rules in natural deduction and sequent calculus handle the introduction and elimination of universal (∀) and existential (∃) quantifiers
introduction (∀-introduction) allows for the generalization of a formula by introducing a universal quantifier
If a formula ϕ has been derived without any assumptions about the variable x, then ∀xϕ can be derived
elimination (∃-elimination) allows for the instantiation of an existentially quantified formula with a specific term
If ∃xϕ has been derived, and a formula ψ can be derived from ϕ[t/x] for some term t, then ψ can be derived
Similar quantifier rules exist in sequent calculus, adapted to work with sequents
Axiom Systems
Axiom Schemas and Substitution
Axiom systems are another approach to proof theory, where a set of axioms is used as the starting point for deriving theorems
Axiom schemas are templates for axioms, containing metavariables that can be instantiated with specific formulas
Example: the ∀x(ϕ→ψ)→(∀xϕ→∀xψ) can be instantiated with specific formulas for ϕ and ψ
is the process of replacing metavariables in an axiom schema with specific formulas to obtain concrete axioms
Allows for the generation of an infinite number of axioms from a finite set of axiom schemas
Herbrand's Theorem
Herbrand's theorem is a fundamental result in proof theory that relates the validity of a first-order formula to the satisfiability of a potentially infinite set of propositional formulas
States that a first-order formula is valid if and only if there exists a finite set of instances of the formula, obtained by substituting terms for variables, that is propositionally unsatisfiable
Provides a bridge between first-order logic and propositional logic
Allows for the reduction of first-order validity to propositional satisfiability
Has important implications for automated theorem proving, as it suggests a way to prove first-order formulas by considering their propositional instances
Automated Theorem Proving
Resolution and Proof Search
Automated theorem proving refers to the use of computer programs to automatically find proofs of mathematical theorems
Resolution is a powerful used in automated theorem proving for first-order logic
Operates on clauses, which are disjunctions of literals (atomic formulas or their negations)
Allows for the derivation of new clauses from existing ones by resolving complementary literals
Example: from the clauses ¬P(x)∨Q(x) and P(a), resolution derives the clause Q(a)
Resolution can be used as a refutation procedure, where the negation of the desired theorem is added to the set of clauses, and resolution is applied until a contradiction (empty clause) is derived
Efficient proof search strategies, such as unit resolution and ordered resolution, are employed to guide the application of resolution inferences
These strategies help reduce the search space and improve the performance of automated theorem provers