You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

First-order logic proof systems build on propositional logic, adding quantifiers and predicates. and are two key approaches, using inference rules to construct proofs. These systems handle quantifiers through special introduction and elimination rules.

systems offer another proof method, using schemas as templates for generating axioms. bridges first-order and propositional logic, while techniques like enable computer-assisted proof discovery in first-order logic.

Natural Deduction and Sequent Calculus

Inference Rules and Proof Systems

Top images from around the web for Inference Rules and Proof Systems
Top images from around the web for Inference Rules and Proof Systems
  • Natural deduction is a proof system that uses a set of inference rules to derive conclusions from premises
    • Consists of introduction and elimination rules for each logical connective
    • Allows for the construction of proofs in a way that closely resembles human reasoning (, )
  • Sequent calculus is another proof system that operates on sequents, which are expressions of the form ΓΔ\Gamma \vdash \Delta
    • Γ\Gamma represents a set of formulas called the antecedent, and Δ\Delta represents a set of formulas called the succedent
    • Sequent calculus rules manipulate these sequents to prove the validity of logical arguments
  • Inference rules in both systems specify how to derive new formulas from existing ones
    • Examples include \wedge-introduction, \vee-elimination, \rightarrow-introduction, and ¬\neg-introduction

Quantifier Rules in Natural Deduction and Sequent Calculus

  • rules in natural deduction and sequent calculus handle the introduction and elimination of universal (\forall) and existential (\exists) quantifiers
  • introduction (\forall-introduction) allows for the generalization of a formula by introducing a universal quantifier
    • If a formula ϕ\phi has been derived without any assumptions about the variable xx, then xϕ\forall x \phi can be derived
  • elimination (\exists-elimination) allows for the instantiation of an existentially quantified formula with a specific term
    • If xϕ\exists x \phi has been derived, and a formula ψ\psi can be derived from ϕ[t/x]\phi[t/x] for some term tt, then ψ\psi can be derived
  • Similar quantifier rules exist in sequent calculus, adapted to work with sequents

Axiom Systems

Axiom Schemas and Substitution

  • Axiom systems are another approach to proof theory, where a set of axioms is used as the starting point for deriving theorems
  • Axiom schemas are templates for axioms, containing metavariables that can be instantiated with specific formulas
    • Example: the x(ϕψ)(xϕxψ)\forall x (\phi \rightarrow \psi) \rightarrow (\forall x \phi \rightarrow \forall x \psi) can be instantiated with specific formulas for ϕ\phi and ψ\psi
  • is the process of replacing metavariables in an axiom schema with specific formulas to obtain concrete axioms
    • Allows for the generation of an infinite number of axioms from a finite set of axiom schemas

Herbrand's Theorem

  • Herbrand's theorem is a fundamental result in proof theory that relates the validity of a first-order formula to the satisfiability of a potentially infinite set of propositional formulas
  • States that a first-order formula is valid if and only if there exists a finite set of instances of the formula, obtained by substituting terms for variables, that is propositionally unsatisfiable
  • Provides a bridge between first-order logic and propositional logic
    • Allows for the reduction of first-order validity to propositional satisfiability
  • Has important implications for automated theorem proving, as it suggests a way to prove first-order formulas by considering their propositional instances

Automated Theorem Proving

  • Automated theorem proving refers to the use of computer programs to automatically find proofs of mathematical theorems
  • Resolution is a powerful used in automated theorem proving for first-order logic
    • Operates on clauses, which are disjunctions of literals (atomic formulas or their negations)
    • Allows for the derivation of new clauses from existing ones by resolving complementary literals
    • Example: from the clauses ¬P(x)Q(x)\neg P(x) \vee Q(x) and P(a)P(a), resolution derives the clause Q(a)Q(a)
  • Resolution can be used as a refutation procedure, where the negation of the desired theorem is added to the set of clauses, and resolution is applied until a contradiction (empty clause) is derived
  • Efficient proof search strategies, such as unit resolution and ordered resolution, are employed to guide the application of resolution inferences
    • These strategies help reduce the search space and improve the performance of automated theorem provers
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary