3.6 Pumping lemma for context-free languages

The pumping lemma for context-free languages is a powerful tool for proving certain languages aren't context-free. It states that long strings in a context-free language can be "pumped" by repeating specific parts while staying in the language.

This lemma builds on the simpler pumping lemma for regular languages, allowing us to distinguish between regular, context-free, and more complex languages. It's crucial for understanding the limits of context-free grammars and pushdown automata in this chapter.

Pumping Lemma for Context-Free Languages

Statement of the Lemma

Top images from around the web for Statement of the Lemma

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Statement of the Lemma

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  CS664 - Formal Language Theory View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• The pumping lemma for context-free languages states that for any context-free language $L$, there exists a constant $p$ (the pumping length) such that any string $w$ in $L$ of length at least $p$ can be decomposed into five substrings ($w = uvxyz$) satisfying specific conditions
• The conditions for the pumping lemma for context-free languages are:
  1. $|vxy| \leq p$
  2. $|vy| > 0$
  3. For all $i \geq 0$, $uv^i xy^i z$ is in $L$
• The substrings $u$, $v$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ are not necessarily unique for a given string $w$ (multiple valid decompositions may exist)
• The pumping lemma for context-free languages is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a language to be context-free (satisfying the lemma does not guarantee context-freeness)

Intuition and Implications

• The pumping lemma for context-free languages captures the idea that in any sufficiently long string in a context-free language, there must be a portion that can be "pumped" (repeated) while keeping the string within the language
• The lemma exploits the fact that context-free grammars can generate strings with nested structures, allowing for the repetition of certain parts without affecting the overall structure
• The pumping length $p$ depends on the specific context-free language and its grammar, but its existence is guaranteed for all context-free languages
• The lemma provides a way to prove that certain languages are not context-free by showing that they violate the pumping property

Applying the Pumping Lemma

Proving a Language is Not Context-Free

• To prove that a language $L$ is not context-free using the pumping lemma, assume that $L$ is context-free and derive a contradiction by showing that for any possible pumping length $p$, there exists a string $w$ in $L$ of length at least $p$ that cannot be pumped according to the conditions of the lemma
• Choose a string $w$ in $L$ that is at least as long as the pumping length $p$ (often chosen based on the structure of the language)
• Consider all possible decompositions of $w$ into $uvxyz$ satisfying the length constraints of the pumping lemma ($|vxy| \leq p$ and $|vy| > 0$)
• For each decomposition, show that pumping the substrings $v$ and $y$ (i.e., $uv^i xy^i z$ for some $i \geq 0$) results in a string that is not in $L$, contradicting the third condition of the pumping lemma
• Conclude that the assumption that $L$ is context-free must be false, and therefore, $L$ is not context-free

Examples of Applying the Pumping Lemma

• Consider the language $L = \{a^[n](https://www.fiveableKeyTerm:n) b^n c^n | n \geq 0\}$. To prove that $L$ is not context-free, choose the string $w = a^p b^p c^p$ (where $p$ is the pumping length) and show that any decomposition of $w$ into $uvxyz$ leads to a contradiction when pumped.
• Another example is the language $L = \{ww^R | w \in \{a, b\}^*\}$ (where $w^R$ denotes the reverse of $w$). Choose the string $w = a^p b^p b^p a^p$ and demonstrate that pumping any possible decomposition violates the structure of the language.

Limitations of the Pumping Lemma

Insufficiency for Proving Context-Freeness

• The pumping lemma for context-free languages is a one-way implication: if a language is context-free, then it satisfies the pumping lemma. However, the converse is not true.
• There exist languages that satisfy the pumping lemma for context-free languages but are not context-free. These languages are called non-context-free languages that satisfy the pumping lemma.
• The pumping lemma cannot be used to prove that a language is context-free; it can only be used to prove that a language is not context-free.
• The pumping lemma does not provide a complete characterization of context-free languages, as there are context-free languages that require a larger pumping length than the one guaranteed by the lemma.

Examples of Limitations

• The language $L = \{a^i b^j c^k | i = j \text{ or } j = k\}$ satisfies the pumping lemma for context-free languages but is not context-free. This demonstrates that satisfying the pumping lemma is not sufficient to conclude context-freeness.
• The language $L = \{a^n b^n c^n d^n | n \geq 0\}$ is not context-free but requires a pumping length larger than the one guaranteed by the lemma. This shows that the pumping lemma does not provide a tight bound on the pumping length for all context-free languages.

Context-Free vs Regular Pumping Lemmas

Similarities and Differences

• Both the pumping lemma for context-free languages and the pumping lemma for regular languages are used to prove that certain languages are not in their respective classes (context-free and regular)
• The pumping lemma for regular languages decomposes a string into three parts ($xyz$), while the pumping lemma for context-free languages decomposes a string into five parts ($uvxyz$)
• In the pumping lemma for regular languages, only the middle substring ($y$) is pumped, whereas in the pumping lemma for context-free languages, two non-adjacent substrings ($v$ and $y$) are pumped simultaneously
• The pumping length for context-free languages is typically larger than the pumping length for regular languages, as context-free languages are a superset of regular languages and can represent more complex structures
• Both pumping lemmas are necessary but not sufficient conditions for a language to belong to their respective classes, meaning that satisfying the pumping lemma does not guarantee that a language is regular or context-free

Examples Comparing the Pumping Lemmas

• The language $L = \{a^n b^n | n \geq 0\}$ is context-free but not regular. It satisfies the pumping lemma for context-free languages but fails the pumping lemma for regular languages.
• The language $L = \{a^n | n \geq 0\}$ is both regular and context-free. It satisfies both the pumping lemma for regular languages and the pumping lemma for context-free languages.
• The language $L = \{a^n b^n c^n | n \geq 0\}$ is neither regular nor context-free. It fails both the pumping lemma for regular languages and the pumping lemma for context-free languages.