Relative cohomology groups extend cohomology to pairs of spaces (X,A), where A is a subspace of X. They capture cohomological information of X relative to A, providing a more refined view of the space's structure.
These groups fit into a connecting the cohomology of X, A, and (X,A). The theorem allows for local computations, while the gives a multiplicative structure to relative cohomology.
Definition of relative cohomology groups
Relative cohomology groups extend the concept of cohomology to pairs of spaces (X,A) where A is a subspace of X
Relative cohomology captures the cohomological information of the space X relative to its subspace A
Relative cohomology groups are denoted by Hn(X,A) for each integer n
Cohomology groups of a pair
Top images from around the web for Cohomology groups of a pair
L∞-algebras and their cohomology | Emergent Scientist View original
For a pair of spaces (X,A), the relative cohomology groups Hn(X,A) are defined as the cohomology groups of the quotient C∗(X,A)=C∗(X)/C∗(A)
The relative cochain complex C∗(X,A) consists of cochains on X that vanish when restricted to A
The relative cohomology groups fit into a long exact sequence relating the cohomology of X, A, and the pair (X,A)
Induced homomorphisms in relative cohomology
Continuous maps between pairs of spaces (X,A)→(Y,B) induce homomorphisms between the corresponding relative cohomology groups Hn(X,A)→Hn(Y,B)
These induced homomorphisms are functorial and compatible with the long exact sequence of pairs
Induced homomorphisms allow for the study of mappings between spaces at the level of relative cohomology
Long exact sequence of a pair
For a pair of spaces (X,A), there is a long exact sequence connecting the cohomology groups of X, A, and the pair (X,A):
⋯→Hn−1(A)→Hn(X,A)→Hn(X)→Hn(A)→Hn+1(X,A)→⋯
The Hn(A)→Hn+1(X,A) measures the obstruction to extending cohomology classes from A to X
The long exact sequence provides a powerful tool for computing relative cohomology groups and understanding their relationships
Excision theorem
The excision theorem is a fundamental result in algebraic topology that relates the relative cohomology of a pair (X,A) to the relative cohomology of a smaller pair (U,U∩A), where U is an open subset of X
Excision allows for the computation of relative cohomology groups by focusing on local information near the subspace A
The excision theorem has important consequences and applications in cohomology theory
Statement of the excision theorem
Let X be a topological space, A a subspace of X, and U an open subset of X such that the closure of U is contained in the interior of A. Then the inclusion map (X∖U,A∖U)↪(X,A) induces isomorphisms in relative cohomology:
Hn(X∖U,A∖U)≅Hn(X,A)
for all integers n
Intuitively, excision states that the relative cohomology of (X,A) depends only on the behavior of the pair near A, and the rest of X can be "excised" without changing the relative cohomology
Consequences of the excision theorem
The excision theorem implies that relative cohomology is a local property, depending only on the behavior of the pair near the subspace
Excision allows for the computation of relative cohomology groups by decomposing the space into simpler pieces
The excision theorem is a key ingredient in the proof of other important results, such as the and the Künneth formula
Applications of the excision theorem
Excision is used to compute the relative cohomology of pairs of spaces that can be decomposed into simpler pieces (CW complexes)
The excision theorem is applied in the study of manifolds and their local properties (local cohomology)
Excision plays a role in the formulation and proof of Poincaré duality for manifolds with boundary
Relative cup product
The relative cup product is a cohomological operation that extends the cup product to relative cohomology groups
It provides a way to multiply relative cohomology classes and obtain new relative cohomology classes
The relative cup product endows the relative cohomology groups with a graded ring structure
Definition of the relative cup product
Let (X,A) be a pair of spaces and H∗(X,A) the . The relative cup product is a bilinear map
∪:Hp(X,A)⊗Hq(X,A)→Hp+q(X,A)
defined by [α]∪[β]=[α∪β], where α and β are relative cocycles and α∪β is their cup product as cochains
The relative cup product is well-defined on cohomology classes and is associative and graded-commutative
Properties of the relative cup product
The relative cup product is natural with respect to maps of pairs, i.e., if f:(X,A)→(Y,B) is a map of pairs, then f∗([α]∪[β])=f∗([α])∪f∗([β])
The relative cup product satisfies the Leibniz rule with respect to the coboundary operator: δ([α]∪[β])=δ([α])∪[β]+(−1)p[α]∪δ([β])
The relative cup product is compatible with the connecting homomorphism in the long exact sequence of a pair
Relative cohomology ring
The relative cohomology groups H∗(X,A) form a graded ring with respect to the relative cup product
The multiplicative structure of the relative cohomology ring encodes additional information about the pair (X,A)
The relative cohomology ring is a powerful tool for studying the algebraic topology of pairs of spaces
Connecting homomorphism
The connecting homomorphism is a linear map that arises in the long exact sequence of relative cohomology groups
It measures the obstruction to extending cohomology classes from the subspace to the entire space
The connecting homomorphism plays a crucial role in understanding the relationship between absolute and relative cohomology
Definition of the connecting homomorphism
In the long exact sequence of relative cohomology for a pair (X,A):
⋯→Hn−1(A)→Hn(X,A)→Hn(X)→Hn(A)δHn+1(X,A)→⋯
the connecting homomorphism δ:Hn(A)→Hn+1(X,A) is defined as follows:
Let [α]∈Hn(A) be a cohomology class represented by a cocycle α∈Cn(A)
Extend α to a cochain α~∈Cn(X) (not necessarily a cocycle)
The coboundary δα~∈Cn+1(X) vanishes when restricted to A, hence it defines a relative cocycle in Cn+1(X,A)
The connecting homomorphism maps [α] to the relative cohomology class [δα~]∈Hn+1(X,A)
Naturality of the connecting homomorphism
The connecting homomorphism is natural with respect to maps of pairs, i.e., if f:(X,A)→(Y,B) is a map of pairs, then the following diagram commutes:
H^n(A) ---δ---> H^{n+1}(X,A)
| |
f^| f^|
v v
H^n(B) ---δ---> H^{n+1}(Y,B)
Naturality allows for the study of the connecting homomorphism under mappings between pairs of spaces
Connecting homomorphism in the long exact sequence
The connecting homomorphism δ:Hn(A)→Hn+1(X,A) fits into the long exact sequence of relative cohomology
It connects the absolute cohomology of the subspace A to the relative cohomology of the pair (X,A)
The connecting homomorphism measures the failure of a cohomology class on A to extend to a cohomology class on X, and it captures the "difference" between absolute and relative cohomology
Relative cohomology vs absolute cohomology
Relative cohomology groups H∗(X,A) provide a more refined version of cohomology compared to absolute cohomology groups H∗(X)
Relative cohomology takes into account the presence of a subspace A and captures the cohomological information of X relative to A
Understanding the relationship between relative and absolute cohomology is crucial for many applications in algebraic topology
Comparison of relative and absolute cohomology groups
There is a natural map from relative cohomology to absolute cohomology, induced by the inclusion (X,∅)↪(X,A):
Hn(X,A)→Hn(X)
This map fits into the long exact sequence of relative cohomology, relating relative cohomology to absolute cohomology of both X and A
In some cases, relative cohomology groups can be computed from absolute cohomology groups using the long exact sequence
Advantages of relative cohomology
Relative cohomology provides a more detailed picture of the cohomological structure of a space, taking into account the presence of a subspace
Relative cohomology is better suited for studying spaces with local properties or spaces that are decomposed into simpler pieces
Relative cohomology is a key tool in the study of manifolds with boundary and in the formulation of
Limitations of relative cohomology
Computing relative cohomology groups can be more challenging than computing absolute cohomology groups, as it involves working with quotient cochain complexes
Relative cohomology may not capture all the relevant information about a space, and in some cases, absolute cohomology or other invariants may be more appropriate
The interpretation of relative cohomology classes may be less intuitive compared to absolute cohomology classes
Computations and examples
Computing relative cohomology groups is an important task in algebraic topology, as it provides insight into the structure of pairs of spaces
Examples of relative cohomology computations include pairs of spaces such as discs and their boundaries, spheres and points, and manifolds with boundary
These computations often rely on the long exact sequence of relative cohomology and the excision theorem
Relative cohomology of a disc and its boundary
Let Dn be the n-dimensional disc and Sn−1 its boundary sphere. The relative cohomology groups H∗(Dn,Sn−1) can be computed using the long exact sequence:
⋯→Hk−1(Sn−1)→Hk(Dn,Sn−1)→Hk(Dn)→Hk(Sn−1)→⋯
Since Dn is contractible, its absolute cohomology vanishes for k>0, and the long exact sequence yields isomorphisms:
Hk(Dn,Sn−1)≅Hk−1(Sn−1)
The relative cohomology groups of (Dn,Sn−1) are thus determined by the absolute cohomology of the sphere Sn−1
Relative cohomology of a sphere and a point
Consider the pair (Sn,{pt}) consisting of an n-dimensional sphere and a point. The relative cohomology groups H∗(Sn,{pt}) can be computed using the long exact sequence:
⋯→Hk−1({pt})→Hk(Sn,{pt})→Hk(Sn)→Hk({pt})→⋯
The absolute cohomology of a point vanishes for k>0, and the long exact sequence yields isomorphisms:
Hk(Sn,{pt})≅Hk(Sn)
for k<n, and a short exact sequence:
0→Hn(Sn,{pt})→Hn(Sn)→Z→0
The relative cohomology groups of (Sn,{pt}) are closely related to the absolute cohomology of the sphere Sn
Relative cohomology of a manifold with boundary
Let M be a compact oriented n-dimensional manifold with boundary ∂M. The relative cohomology groups H∗(M,∂M) are related to the absolute cohomology of M and ∂M via the long exact sequence:
⋯→Hk−1(∂M)→Hk(M,∂M)→Hk(M)→Hk(∂M)→⋯
The excision theorem can be used to compute the relative cohomology groups H∗(M,∂M) by decomposing M into simpler pieces
Poincaré-Lefschetz duality relates the relative cohomology of (M,∂M) to the absolute homology of M, providing another approach to computing these groups
Applications of relative cohomology
Relative cohomology has numerous applications in algebraic topology and related fields
It plays a crucial role in the study of manifolds with boundary, providing a cohomological framework for Poincaré-Lefschetz duality
Relative cohomology is used in the formulation of the and in
Poincaré-Lefschetz duality
Poincaré-Lefschetz duality is a generalization of Poincaré duality for manifolds with boundary
It relates the relative cohomology of a compact oriented manifold (M,∂M) to the absolute homology of M:
Hk(M,∂M)≅Hn−k(M)
where n is the dimension of M
Poincaré-Lefschetz duality provides a powerful tool for computing relative cohomology groups and understanding the topology of manifolds with boundary
Thom isomorphism theorem
The Thom isomorphism theorem relates the cohomology of a vector bundle to the compactly supported cohomology of its total space
It states that for a rank k vector bundle E over a space X, there is an isomorphism:
Hn+k(E,E0)≅Hn(X)
where E0 is the complement of the zero section of E
The Hn+k(E,E0) is called the Thom space of the vector bundle, and the isomorphism is given by the Thom class
The Thom isomorphism theorem has applications in characteristic class theory and in the study of orientability of vector bundles
Obstruction theory and relative cohomology
Obstruction theory is a framework for studying the existence and uniqueness of continuous mappings between spaces satisfying certain conditions
Relative cohomology plays a role in obstruction theory by measuring the obstruction to extending maps or homotopies
The obstruction classes live in relative cohomology groups and provide information about the possibility of constructing mappings with desired properties
Obstruction theory has applications in the classification of vector bundles, the study of characteristic classes, and in understanding the h