3.4 Scientific Method and Experimentation

The Scientific Revolution marked a pivotal shift in how we understand the world. Thinkers like Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo championed observation and experimentation over blind acceptance of authority. This new approach laid the groundwork for modern scientific inquiry.

At the heart of this revolution was the development of the scientific method. This systematic approach to knowledge emphasizes formulating hypotheses, designing experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. It became the cornerstone of scientific progress, enabling breakthroughs across various fields.

Steps of the Scientific Method

Overview of the Scientific Method

Top images from around the web for Overview of the Scientific Method

• 

  Reading: The Scientific Method | Introduction to Sociology (Waymaker) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scientific method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scientific method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: The Scientific Method | Introduction to Sociology (Waymaker) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scientific method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Overview of the Scientific Method

• 

  Reading: The Scientific Method | Introduction to Sociology (Waymaker) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scientific method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scientific method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: The Scientific Method | Introduction to Sociology (Waymaker) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scientific method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Iterative process used to investigate phenomena, acquire new knowledge, and correct or integrate previous knowledge through empirical evidence
• Begins with identifying a question or problem based on observations of the natural world
  • The question should be empirically testable

Formulating a Hypothesis

• A hypothesis is formed as a tentative explanation for the observations
  • It is a specific, testable prediction about what will happen in a study
• Hypotheses are often stated in an "if-then" format
  • Example: If plants receive fertilizer (independent variable), then they will grow taller (dependent variable) compared to plants not receiving fertilizer

Designing and Conducting an Experiment

• Designing an experiment involves identifying variables, defining operational terms, and establishing methods for measuring outcomes
  • Independent variable: The factor manipulated by the experimenter
  • Dependent variable: The measurable outcome of the experiment
  • Controlled variables: Potential confounding factors held constant
• Operational definitions specify exactly how variables will be manipulated and measured
  • Allows other researchers to replicate the experiment
• Experiments are conducted under controlled conditions to test the hypothesis
  • Involves collecting quantitative or qualitative data

Analyzing Data and Drawing Conclusions

• Analyzing data includes determining if the hypothesis is supported or refuted
  • Statistical tests (t-tests, ANOVA) are used to determine significance of results
• Conclusions are drawn to assess if the hypothesis is valid and determine next steps
  • Revising the hypothesis, identifying new questions, or replicating the study
• Results are interpreted in the context of existing knowledge and theory
  • Researchers consider alternative explanations and limitations of the study

Communicating Results

• Scientists communicate their results through scholarly publications (journal articles) and presentations (conference talks)
  • Allows the scientific community to scrutinize and build upon the research
• Peer review process ensures the quality and integrity of published research
  • Experts in the field evaluate the study's methods, results, and conclusions
• Replication of experiments by other researchers helps to validate findings
  • Reduces potential for bias or error influencing conclusions

Importance of Experimentation

Role of Experimentation in the Scientific Method

• Experimentation is a crucial component of the scientific method
  • Allows researchers to test hypotheses under controlled conditions
• Experiments establish cause and effect relationships between variables
  • Manipulating one variable (independent) while controlling all others
• Controlling variables allows scientists to rule out alternative explanations
  • Confounding factors that could influence the dependent variable are minimized

Characteristics of Well-Designed Experiments

• Experiments should be designed to be replicable
  • Other scientists can verify results using the same methods
  • Detailed protocols ensure consistency across replications
• Adequate sample sizes are needed to detect meaningful effects
  • Larger samples better represent the population and reduce sampling error
• Random assignment of participants to treatment groups reduces bias
  • Ensures group equivalency and minimizes potential confounding variables
• Appropriate controls are used to provide a baseline for comparison
  • Placebo controls and waitlist controls are common in medical research

Advancing Scientific Knowledge through Experimentation

• Outcomes of experiments lead scientists to accept, reject, or modify hypotheses
  • Moves scientific knowledge forward and sparks new research questions
• Experiments build on previous findings to refine theories and models
  • Replication with different populations or settings tests generalizability
• Meta-analyses synthesize results across many experiments
  • Provides a more comprehensive understanding of a research question
• Without experimentation, scientific conclusions would be limited
  • Experiments provide empirical evidence to support scientific claims

Contributions of the Scientific Revolution

Shift Toward Empiricism and Inductive Reasoning

• The Scientific Revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries marked a shift in thinking
  • Moved from accepting religious or classical authorities to using empirical evidence and inductive reasoning
• Francis Bacon emphasized inductive reasoning and the need to gather data through direct observation before drawing conclusions
  • Contrasted with the Aristotelian method of deductive reasoning from first principles
• Empiricism holds that knowledge comes from sensory experience
  • Observation and experimentation are key to acquiring knowledge

Key Figures and Their Contributions

• Galileo made several key contributions to the scientific method
  • Use of mathematics to describe physical phenomena
  • Emphasis on systematic experimentation to test hypotheses
  • Idea that the simplest explanation (parsimony) is preferred
• Descartes introduced the idea of radical skepticism
  • Rejected previous assumptions and built knowledge from a foundation of what cannot be doubted
  • Skepticism underlies the need for empirical testing in science
• Newton demonstrated the power of the scientific method
  • Derived fundamental laws (of motion and universal gravitation) that could explain a wide range of phenomena
  • Principia Mathematica laid the foundations of classical mechanics

Emergence of Scientific Institutions and Norms

• The Royal Society of London, the first scientific society, was founded in 1660
  • Promoted an experimental approach to science
  • Similar groups emerged across Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries
• Peer review emerged as a way to validate research findings
  • Findings presented to scientific societies for critique and replication
• Scientific journals (Philosophical Transactions) began publishing experimental results
  • Enabled scientists to build on each other's work more efficiently
• Norms of openness, skepticism, and empiricism became central to science
  • Contrasted with the secrecy and authoritarianism that preceded the Scientific Revolution

Applying the Scientific Method

Developing Testable Hypotheses

• Designing an experiment starts with a research question and hypothesis
  • The hypothesis predicts the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable
• Hypotheses should be specific, testable predictions
  • Vague or untestable hypotheses (God exists) are not appropriate for scientific investigation
• Operational definitions specify exactly how variables will be manipulated and measured
  • Allows other researchers to replicate the experiment
  • Example: Defining "aggression" as number of times a child hits a Bobo doll

Identifying and Controlling Variables

• The independent variable (IV) is the factor manipulated by the experimenter
  • May have different levels or treatment conditions
  • Example: Testing the effects of caffeine (IV) on reaction time by giving participants 0mg, 100mg, or 200mg of caffeine
• Dependent variables (DVs) are the measurable outcomes of the experiment
  • Should be quantifiable with tools that produce reliable, valid data
  • Example: Measuring reaction time in milliseconds using a computerized test
• Controlled variables are potential confounding factors held constant
  • Researchers try to control as many extraneous variables as possible
  • Example: Ensuring all participants are tested at the same time of day to control for circadian rhythm effects

Evaluating Experimental Designs and Results

• Random assignment of participants to treatment groups is critical
  • Reduces bias and ensures group equivalency
  • Larger sample sizes better represent the population and reduce chance differences between groups
• Statistical analysis determines the significance of the results
  • Whether differences between groups are likely due to chance or the IV manipulation
  • Appropriate statistical tests (t-tests, ANOVA, regression) depend on the research design and types of variables
• Evaluating an experiment involves considering several factors:
  • Soundness of the methodology and controls for potential confounds
  • Potential sources of bias (demand characteristics, experimenter bias) or error (measurement error)
  • Limitations to generalizability (sample characteristics, experimental setting)
  • Implications and practical significance of the findings
• Replication and meta-analysis help to validate and extend experimental findings
  • Direct replication tests reliability of the original finding
  • Conceptual replication tests generalizability to new contexts or populations