4.2 Non-probability sampling

Non-probability sampling is a crucial technique in political research, offering flexibility when random selection isn't feasible. It includes methods like convenience, purposive, quota, and snowball sampling, each with unique advantages for specific research scenarios.

While non-probability sampling can be faster and more cost-effective, it has limitations in generalizability and potential bias. Researchers must carefully consider their objectives, target population, and available resources when choosing between non-probability and probability sampling methods.

Types of non-probability sampling

• Non-probability sampling involves selecting participants based on non-random criteria, such as accessibility, specific characteristics, or researcher judgment
• Unlike probability sampling, non-probability sampling does not give every member of the population an equal chance of being selected, which can limit the generalizability of findings

Convenience sampling

Top images from around the web for Convenience sampling

• 

  Public Opinion: How is it measured? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Sources: Bias – Introduction to College Research View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Sampling View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Public Opinion: How is it measured? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Sources: Bias – Introduction to College Research View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Convenience sampling

• 

  Public Opinion: How is it measured? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Sources: Bias – Introduction to College Research View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Sampling View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Public Opinion: How is it measured? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Sources: Bias – Introduction to College Research View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Selects participants who are readily available and easily accessible to the researcher (students on a university campus)
• Often used in pilot studies or when resources are limited
• Results may not be representative of the larger population due to potential bias in the sample

Purposive sampling

• Deliberately selects participants based on specific characteristics or criteria relevant to the research question (voters who identify as independent)
• Allows researchers to focus on particular subgroups or cases of interest
• Requires careful justification of the selection criteria to ensure the sample aligns with the research objectives

Quota sampling

• Sets predetermined quotas for different subgroups within the population based on known characteristics (age, gender, race)
• Ensures that the sample includes a specified proportion of each subgroup
• Does not guarantee representativeness within each subgroup, as participants are still selected non-randomly

Snowball sampling

• Begins with a small group of initial participants who then refer or recruit additional participants from their social networks
• Useful for studying hard-to-reach or hidden populations (undocumented immigrants, drug users)
• Can introduce bias if the initial participants are not diverse or if certain types of individuals are more likely to be referred

Advantages of non-probability sampling

• Non-probability sampling offers several benefits, particularly when probability sampling is not feasible or appropriate for the research objectives
• These advantages can make non-probability sampling an attractive option for certain types of political research, despite its limitations

Speed and cost efficiency

• Non-probability sampling methods are generally faster and less expensive than probability sampling
• Convenience and purposive sampling allow researchers to quickly recruit participants without the need for extensive sampling frames or complex random selection procedures
• Reduced time and cost can be especially beneficial for exploratory research or studies with limited resources

Studying hard-to-reach populations

• Some populations may be difficult to access or identify through probability sampling methods (homeless individuals, marginalized communities)
• Non-probability sampling techniques like snowball sampling can help researchers penetrate these hard-to-reach groups by leveraging social networks and referrals
• Allows for the study of populations that might otherwise be excluded from research

Exploratory research applications

• Non-probability sampling can be valuable for exploratory research aimed at generating hypotheses or gaining initial insights into a topic
• Purposive sampling enables researchers to select information-rich cases that can provide in-depth understanding of a phenomenon
• Findings from non-probability samples can inform the design of larger, more representative studies using probability sampling

Disadvantages of non-probability sampling

• While non-probability sampling has its advantages, it also comes with significant drawbacks that researchers must consider when interpreting and applying their findings
• These limitations can affect the validity and reliability of research conclusions drawn from non-probability samples

Lack of generalizability

• Non-probability samples are not representative of the larger population, as not every member has an equal chance of being selected
• Results from non-probability samples cannot be confidently generalized to the broader population of interest
• Limits the external validity of the research findings and the ability to make broad inferences

Potential for bias

• Non-probability sampling methods are more susceptible to various forms of bias, such as selection bias and voluntary response bias
• Researchers' subjective judgments in selecting participants can introduce bias that skews the sample composition
• Certain types of individuals may be more likely to participate or be selected, leading to an overrepresentation of specific characteristics

Limited statistical inference

• Non-probability sampling does not allow for the calculation of sampling error or the use of inferential statistics to estimate population parameters
• Researchers cannot determine the precision or reliability of estimates derived from non-probability samples
• Makes it difficult to assess the statistical significance of findings or to construct confidence intervals around estimates

Non-probability vs probability sampling

• Understanding the differences between non-probability and probability sampling is crucial for selecting appropriate methods and interpreting research findings
• Each approach has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the research objectives, population characteristics, and available resources

Differences in representativeness

• Probability sampling aims to create a representative sample by giving every member of the population an equal chance of being selected through random selection methods
• Non-probability sampling does not ensure representativeness, as participants are selected based on non-random criteria such as convenience, purposive selection, or quotas
• Probability samples are more likely to accurately reflect the characteristics of the larger population, while non-probability samples may be biased towards certain subgroups

Trade-offs in efficiency and accuracy

• Non-probability sampling is often more efficient in terms of time and cost compared to probability sampling, as it does not require complex sampling frames or random selection procedures
• However, the efficiency gains of non-probability sampling come at the cost of reduced accuracy and generalizability of the findings
• Probability sampling provides more reliable and precise estimates of population parameters, but it can be more resource-intensive and time-consuming to implement

Applications in political research

• Non-probability sampling methods are commonly used in various areas of political research, depending on the research objectives and constraints
• While non-probability sampling has limitations, it can still provide valuable insights and contribute to the understanding of political phenomena

Public opinion polling

• Non-probability sampling methods, such as online panels or convenience samples, are sometimes used in public opinion polls when probability sampling is not feasible or too costly
• These methods can quickly gauge public sentiment on political issues or candidates, although the results may not be fully representative of the larger population
• Researchers must be cautious in interpreting and generalizing findings from non-probability opinion polls

Case study selection

• Purposive sampling is often used in case study research to select specific cases that are informative or theoretically relevant to the research question
• Researchers can deliberately choose cases that exhibit certain characteristics or outcomes of interest (successful policy implementations, contentious political events)
• Allows for in-depth analysis of selected cases, but the findings may not be generalizable to other contexts

Expert interviews

• Non-probability sampling, particularly purposive sampling, is commonly used when conducting interviews with experts or key informants in political research
• Researchers can select participants based on their expertise, experience, or position within relevant organizations or institutions
• Expert interviews can provide valuable insights and contextual information, but the findings may be influenced by the specific individuals selected

Considerations for using non-probability sampling

• When deciding whether to use non-probability sampling in political research, researchers must carefully consider various factors to ensure the method aligns with their research goals and constraints
• These considerations can help researchers make informed decisions and justify their sampling choices

Research objectives and questions

• The choice of sampling method should be guided by the research objectives and questions
• Non-probability sampling may be appropriate for exploratory research, hypothesis generation, or studies focused on specific subgroups or cases
• Probability sampling is generally preferred when the goal is to make generalizable inferences about a larger population

Target population characteristics

• The nature and accessibility of the target population can influence the choice of sampling method
• Non-probability sampling may be necessary when the population is hard to reach, hidden, or lacks a comprehensive sampling frame
• Probability sampling is more feasible when the population is well-defined and accessible through random selection methods

Available resources and constraints

• Researchers must consider the available resources, such as time, budget, and personnel, when selecting a sampling method
• Non-probability sampling can be more cost-effective and time-efficient compared to probability sampling, making it a practical choice when resources are limited
• However, researchers should weigh the trade-offs between efficiency and the potential limitations of non-probability sampling in terms of representativeness and generalizability