4.2 Public, Private, and Consortium Blockchains

Blockchain networks come in three main flavors: public, private, and consortium. Each type has its own strengths and weaknesses, shaping how they're used in the real world. Understanding these differences is key to grasping blockchain's potential.

Public blockchains are open to everyone, offering transparency and decentralization. Private blockchains are controlled by a single entity, prioritizing speed and efficiency. Consortium blockchains strike a balance, with a group of organizations sharing control and decision-making power.

Types of Blockchains

Public Blockchains

Top images from around the web for Public Blockchains

• 

  Types of Blockchains View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Blockchain Consensus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Blockchain Consensus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Types of Blockchains View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Blockchain Consensus View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Public Blockchains

• 

  Types of Blockchains View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Blockchain Consensus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Blockchain Consensus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Types of Blockchains View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Blockchain Consensus View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Open and permissionless networks where anyone can join, participate, and validate transactions without needing approval from a central authority
• Transactions are transparent and visible to all participants, ensuring a high level of trust and security (Bitcoin, Ethereum)
• Consensus mechanisms like Proof-of-Work (PoW) or Proof-of-Stake (PoS) are used to validate transactions and maintain the integrity of the blockchain
• Public blockchains are typically slower and less scalable compared to private or consortium blockchains due to the large number of participants and the need for consensus

Private Blockchains

• Permissioned networks where access is restricted to a select group of participants, usually within a single organization or entity
• Transactions are only visible to authorized participants, providing a higher level of privacy and confidentiality compared to public blockchains
• Consensus mechanisms are often less computationally intensive, as the network is smaller and more centralized, leading to faster transaction speeds and lower costs
• Private blockchains sacrifice some level of decentralization for increased control, efficiency, and scalability

Consortium Blockchains

• Semi-permissioned networks governed by a group of organizations or entities, rather than a single entity or the general public
• Participants are pre-selected and granted access based on their roles and responsibilities within the consortium
• Consensus is reached through a predetermined process agreed upon by the consortium members, often using less resource-intensive mechanisms compared to public blockchains
• Consortium blockchains strike a balance between the transparency of public blockchains and the privacy of private blockchains, making them suitable for industries with multiple stakeholders (supply chain management, healthcare)

Key Characteristics

Decentralization and Access Control

• Public blockchains are highly decentralized, with no central authority controlling the network, ensuring censorship resistance and immutability
• Private blockchains are more centralized, with a single entity maintaining control over the network and determining access rights
• Consortium blockchains have a moderate level of decentralization, with control distributed among a group of entities, striking a balance between decentralization and efficiency

Governance Models and Consensus Mechanisms

• Public blockchains rely on community governance, where decisions are made through a decentralized voting process or by following the protocol rules
• Private blockchains are governed by a single entity, which can make unilateral decisions and change the rules of the network as needed
• Consortium blockchains have a shared governance model, where decisions are made collectively by the participating entities through a predetermined process
• Consensus mechanisms vary based on the type of blockchain, with public blockchains using PoW or PoS, while private and consortium blockchains may use less resource-intensive algorithms like Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) or Raft

Scalability and Performance Trade-offs

• Public blockchains often face scalability challenges due to the large number of participants and the need for global consensus, resulting in slower transaction speeds and higher costs
• Private blockchains can achieve higher transaction throughput and lower latency, as the network is smaller and more centralized, allowing for faster consensus
• Consortium blockchains can strike a balance between scalability and decentralization, with performance depending on the number of participating entities and the chosen consensus mechanism
• Scalability solutions such as sharding, sidechains, and off-chain transactions are being developed to improve the performance of blockchains across all types

Applications

Public Blockchain Use Cases

• Cryptocurrencies and decentralized financial applications (Bitcoin, Ethereum, DeFi platforms)
• Decentralized applications (dApps) and smart contracts for various industries (gaming, prediction markets, social networks)
• Decentralized identity management and self-sovereign identity solutions
• Transparent and immutable record-keeping for public records, such as land registries and voting systems

Private and Consortium Blockchain Use Cases

• Supply chain management and provenance tracking, enabling transparent and efficient tracking of goods from origin to end-user (IBM Food Trust, Maersk TradeLens)
• Secure and interoperable health data management, allowing for efficient sharing of patient data among healthcare providers while maintaining privacy (Mediledger, Hashed Health)
• Cross-border payments and settlements, reducing costs and increasing speed compared to traditional financial systems (Ripple, R3 Corda)
• Intellectual property management and rights attribution for creators and artists (Kodak KODAKOne, Mycelia)