5.3 Curriculum-based measurement

Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) is a powerful tool in special education, providing frequent, brief assessments to monitor student progress. It enables teachers to tailor interventions and track growth towards educational goals, offering a systematic approach to evaluate academic skills.

CBM differs from traditional assessments by focusing on ongoing formative evaluation, allowing for immediate feedback and instructional adjustments. Its sensitivity to small changes makes it particularly valuable for students with disabilities, helping educators make data-driven decisions and set measurable IEP goals.

Definition and purpose

• Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) provides educators with a systematic approach to assess student progress in academic skills
• CBM plays a crucial role in Special Education by offering frequent, brief assessments to monitor student growth and inform instructional decisions
• Enables teachers to tailor interventions based on individual student needs and track progress towards educational goals

Origins of CBM

Top images from around the web for Origins of CBM

• 

  Curriculum-Based Measurement progress data: Effects of graph pattern on ease of interpretation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  4.2 Sociological Influences of the Four Curricula | Foundations of Education View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Effects of using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) for progress monitoring in reading and an ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Curriculum-Based Measurement progress data: Effects of graph pattern on ease of interpretation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  4.2 Sociological Influences of the Four Curricula | Foundations of Education View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Origins of CBM

• 

  Curriculum-Based Measurement progress data: Effects of graph pattern on ease of interpretation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  4.2 Sociological Influences of the Four Curricula | Foundations of Education View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Effects of using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) for progress monitoring in reading and an ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Curriculum-Based Measurement progress data: Effects of graph pattern on ease of interpretation ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  4.2 Sociological Influences of the Four Curricula | Foundations of Education View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Developed in the 1970s by Stanley Deno and colleagues at the University of Minnesota
• Emerged from the need for more sensitive and frequent measures of student progress
• Initially focused on reading fluency, later expanded to other academic areas
• Addressed limitations of traditional norm-referenced tests in special education settings

Key characteristics of CBM

• Directly aligned with curriculum content and instructional goals
• Standardized administration and scoring procedures ensure consistency
• Brief and frequent assessments (typically 1-3 minutes) allow for regular progress monitoring
• Sensitive to small changes in student performance over time
• Produces quantifiable data for objective decision-making
• Allows for comparison of student performance against peers or established benchmarks

Types of CBM

Reading CBM

• Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) measures words read correctly per minute
• Maze tasks assess reading comprehension through cloze procedures
• Letter Sound Fluency evaluates early literacy skills in younger students
• Nonsense Word Fluency assesses phonics and decoding abilities

Math CBM

• Computation probes measure basic arithmetic skills (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division)
• Concepts and Applications assess problem-solving and mathematical reasoning
• Early Numeracy probes evaluate foundational math skills (number identification, quantity discrimination)
• Fact Fluency measures automaticity in basic math facts

Writing CBM

• Total Words Written (TWW) assesses writing fluency
• Words Spelled Correctly (WSC) evaluates spelling accuracy
• Correct Writing Sequences (CWS) measures overall writing quality
• Correct Minus Incorrect Writing Sequences (CIWS) provides a more nuanced measure of writing proficiency

Content area CBM

• Science vocabulary measures assess understanding of key terms
• Social studies fact fluency evaluates recall of important historical or geographical information
• Curriculum-specific probes tailored to specific subject matter content
• Concept application tasks assess higher-order thinking skills within content areas

Implementation process

Selecting appropriate measures

• Consider student's grade level and current skill level
• Align measures with specific academic goals and curriculum content
• Choose probes that are sensitive to expected growth rates
• Ensure measures are appropriate for the student's disability or learning needs

Establishing baseline performance

• Administer multiple probes (typically 3) to obtain a stable initial performance level
• Calculate median score to determine starting point for progress monitoring
• Use grade-level materials or adjust difficulty based on student's current abilities
• Consider seasonal effects or external factors that may influence initial performance

Setting goals and benchmarks

• Utilize research-based norms or local norms to establish realistic growth targets
• Consider rate of improvement (ROI) expected for typically developing peers
• Set ambitious yet attainable goals based on student's current performance level
• Align goals with IEP objectives and grade-level expectations

Administering CBM probes

• Follow standardized procedures for each measure to ensure consistency
• Provide clear instructions and practice opportunities for students
• Time assessments accurately using stopwatch or digital timer
• Maintain a distraction-free environment during administration
• Adhere to specific scoring rules for each type of CBM probe

Data collection and analysis

Frequency of measurement

• Weekly or bi-weekly assessments for students receiving intensive interventions
• Monthly assessments for students making adequate progress
• Adjust frequency based on individual student needs and rate of progress
• Consider more frequent measurements during critical periods or after changes in instruction

Scoring procedures

• Use standardized scoring criteria specific to each CBM measure
• Calculate key metrics (words correct per minute, digits correct, etc.)
• Record scores immediately after administration for accuracy
• Double-check scoring to ensure reliability of data

Graphing and interpreting results

• Plot scores on a time-series graph to visualize progress over time
• Include aim line or goal line to compare actual performance to expected growth
• Analyze trend lines to determine rate of improvement (ROI)
• Identify patterns or fluctuations in performance data
• Use decision rules (4-point rule, trend line analysis) to evaluate effectiveness of interventions

Benefits of CBM

Progress monitoring

• Provides frequent, ongoing assessment of student growth
• Allows for early identification of students not making adequate progress
• Enables timely adjustments to instruction or interventions
• Facilitates communication of student progress to parents and other stakeholders

Instructional decision-making

• Informs data-driven decisions about instructional strategies
• Helps identify specific skill deficits requiring targeted intervention
• Supports evaluation of intervention effectiveness
• Guides decisions about intensity and duration of instructional support

IEP goal setting

• Provides objective data for developing measurable annual goals
• Allows for precise tracking of progress towards IEP objectives
• Facilitates meaningful discussions during IEP team meetings
• Supports documentation of student growth for legal and accountability purposes

Challenges and limitations

Time constraints

• Administering frequent assessments can be time-consuming for teachers
• Scoring and data entry may require additional time outside of instructional hours
• Balancing assessment time with instructional time can be challenging
• Implementing CBM across multiple subjects or students increases time demands

Teacher training requirements

• Proper administration and scoring of CBM probes requires specific training
• Interpreting CBM data and making instructional decisions based on results necessitates ongoing professional development
• Keeping up with new CBM measures and best practices demands continuous learning
• Ensuring consistency across multiple teachers or paraprofessionals can be challenging

Validity and reliability concerns

• Some CBM measures may not fully capture complex skills or higher-order thinking
• Potential for practice effects with repeated administration of similar probes
• Variability in student performance due to external factors (fatigue, motivation) can impact reliability
• Ensuring cultural and linguistic fairness in CBM measures for diverse student populations

CBM vs traditional assessments

Formative vs summative assessment

• CBM provides ongoing formative assessment to guide instruction
• Traditional assessments often focus on summative evaluation at end of units or school year
• CBM allows for immediate feedback and adjustment of teaching strategies
• Traditional assessments may not capture small increments of progress over short time periods

Sensitivity to small changes

• CBM measures designed to detect subtle improvements in student performance
• Traditional assessments may not be sensitive enough to show growth in students with disabilities
• CBM allows for frequent measurement of specific skills targeted in interventions
• Traditional assessments often cover broader content areas, potentially masking progress in specific skill areas

Technology integration

Digital CBM tools

• Online platforms for administering and scoring CBM probes
• Mobile apps for easy data collection and analysis
• Computer-adaptive CBM measures that adjust difficulty based on student responses
• Digital stopwatches and timers for precise measurement of timed assessments

Automated data collection

• Software that automatically calculates scores and generates progress reports
• Integration with student information systems for streamlined data management
• Real-time data visualization tools for immediate analysis of student performance
• Cloud-based storage solutions for secure and accessible data across multiple devices

CBM in special education

Adapting measures for disabilities

• Modifying CBM probes for students with visual impairments (large print, braille)
• Providing accommodations for students with physical disabilities (assistive technology)
• Developing alternative response formats for students with severe disabilities
• Considering language proficiency when selecting measures for English language learners with disabilities

Using CBM for RTI

• Screening all students to identify those at risk for academic difficulties
• Providing tiered interventions based on CBM data
• Monitoring response to interventions to determine need for more intensive support
• Supporting decisions about special education referrals and eligibility

Legal and ethical considerations

IDEA compliance

• Ensuring CBM practices align with Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requirements
• Using CBM data to support appropriate identification and placement decisions
• Incorporating CBM results into present levels of performance in IEPs
• Demonstrating progress monitoring as part of Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)

Confidentiality and data sharing

• Protecting student privacy when collecting and storing CBM data
• Establishing protocols for secure transmission of CBM results
• Obtaining informed consent for sharing CBM data with outside agencies or researchers
• Training staff on ethical considerations in CBM administration and data use