Interest-based bargaining focuses on uncovering underlying needs and motivations behind negotiation positions. By understanding each party's interests, negotiators can find creative solutions that satisfy everyone's core concerns, leading to more sustainable agreements.
Joint problem-solving encourages collaboration and creativity in generating options. This approach emphasizes brainstorming , objective evaluation, and establishing fair criteria for decision-making. It aims to expand the pie and create value for all parties involved in the negotiation.
Understanding Interests
Distinguishing Interests from Positions
Top images from around the web for Distinguishing Interests from Positions Negotiation - Praxis Framework View original
Is this image relevant?
Stages of Negotiation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Eight lessons we learned about problem solving | X&Y Partners View original
Is this image relevant?
Negotiation - Praxis Framework View original
Is this image relevant?
Stages of Negotiation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Distinguishing Interests from Positions Negotiation - Praxis Framework View original
Is this image relevant?
Stages of Negotiation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Eight lessons we learned about problem solving | X&Y Partners View original
Is this image relevant?
Negotiation - Praxis Framework View original
Is this image relevant?
Stages of Negotiation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Interests represent underlying motivations, desires, and needs driving negotiation positions
Positions manifest as specific demands or stated outcomes parties seek in negotiations
Focusing on interests enables more flexible and creative problem-solving approaches
Interests often include security, economic well-being, recognition, and control over one's life
Identifying shared or compatible interests creates opportunities for mutually beneficial agreements
Uncovering Underlying Needs and Motivations
Probing questions help reveal hidden interests behind stated positions
Active listening techniques uncover emotional and psychological needs driving negotiation behavior
Common underlying needs include respect, autonomy, fairness, and belonging
Recognizing diverse cultural values shapes understanding of parties' core interests
Analyzing past behaviors and decisions provides insights into unstated priorities
Evaluating Alternatives and Leverage
BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) represents the most favorable outcome if negotiations fail
Assessing one's BATNA strengthens negotiating position and determines walkaway point
Improving BATNA increases leverage and bargaining power in negotiations
WATNA (Worst Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) helps gauge risks of failed negotiations
Comparing BATNAs of all parties informs realistic expectations for potential agreements
Depersonalizing Conflicts for Effective Resolution
Separating people from the problem reduces emotional barriers to agreement
Focusing on issues rather than personalities promotes objective problem-solving
Acknowledging emotions without letting them dictate negotiation outcomes
Reframing personal attacks as joint problems to be solved collaboratively
Building working relationships separate from substantive disagreements enhances long-term cooperation
Collaborative Problem-Solving
Generating Creative Solutions
Brainstorming encourages free flow of ideas without immediate judgment
Quantity of ideas prioritized over quality in initial stages of option generation
Building on others' suggestions through associative thinking expands solution space
Combining and refining multiple ideas creates innovative hybrid solutions
Encouraging wild or unconventional ideas challenges assumptions and sparks creativity
Evaluating and Refining Options
Option generation produces diverse range of potential solutions to negotiation challenges
Systematically assessing options against parties' interests narrows focus to viable alternatives
Identifying potential obstacles or implementation issues for each option
Combining elements from multiple options to create integrated solutions
Involving stakeholders in option evaluation increases buy-in and commitment to final agreement
Establishing Objective Decision-Making Criteria
Objective criteria provide fair standards for evaluating and selecting options
Common criteria include scientific judgments, professional standards, and legal precedent
Market value, precedent, and moral standards serve as additional sources of objective criteria
Agreeing on criteria before applying them to specific options reduces bias and conflict
Using multiple criteria ensures comprehensive evaluation of potential agreements
Enhancing Communication and Understanding
Active listening involves fully concentrating, understanding, responding, and remembering
Paraphrasing and summarizing demonstrate understanding and clarify miscommunications
Open-ended questions encourage elaboration and reveal underlying interests
Acknowledging emotions and perspectives builds rapport and trust between parties
Non-verbal cues (eye contact, body language) reinforce attentiveness and engagement