Fixed points and monotone functions are key concepts in lattice theory. They help us understand how functions behave on ordered structures, with fixed points representing stable states and monotone functions preserving order.
The Knaster-Tarski theorem is a powerful result for complete lattices. It guarantees that monotone functions on complete lattices always have fixed points, forming a themselves. This theorem has wide-ranging applications in mathematics and computer science.
Fixed Points and Monotone Functions
Properties and Definitions
Top images from around the web for Properties and Definitions
Fixed Point Theorem for Non-self Mapping in Cone Metric Space View original
Is this image relevant?
Generalization of Common Fixed Point Theorems for Two Mappings View original
Is this image relevant?
Fixed Point Theorem for Non-self Mapping in Cone Metric Space View original
Is this image relevant?
Generalization of Common Fixed Point Theorems for Two Mappings View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Properties and Definitions
Fixed Point Theorem for Non-self Mapping in Cone Metric Space View original
Is this image relevant?
Generalization of Common Fixed Point Theorems for Two Mappings View original
Is this image relevant?
Fixed Point Theorem for Non-self Mapping in Cone Metric Space View original
Is this image relevant?
Generalization of Common Fixed Point Theorems for Two Mappings View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Fixed point a point x in the domain of a function f such that f(x)=x
Monotone function a function between partially ordered sets that preserves the given order
If f:P→Q is a function between two partially ordered sets (P,≤P) and (Q,≤Q), then f is monotone if for all a,b∈P, a≤Pb implies f(a)≤Qf(b)
the smallest element of the set of fixed points of a function, if it exists
For a function f:P→P on a partially ordered set (P,≤), an element x∈P is the least fixed point of f if x is a fixed point of f and for every fixed point y of f, x≤y
the largest element of the set of fixed points of a function, if it exists
For a function f:P→P on a partially ordered set (P,≤), an element x∈P is the greatest fixed point of f if x is a fixed point of f and for every fixed point y of f, y≤x
Examples
Consider the function f:R→R defined by f(x)=x2
The fixed points of f are the solutions to the equation x=x2, which are x=0 and x=1
f is not monotone on R because, for example, −1≤0 but f(−1)=1≤0=f(0)
Let f:P(N)→P(N) be defined by f(X)={0}∪{n+1∣n∈X} for X⊆N
f is monotone with respect to set inclusion ⊆ because if A⊆B, then f(A)⊆f(B)
The least fixed point of f is N, and the greatest fixed point is also N
Knaster-Tarski Theorem
Statement and Significance
Knaster-Tarski theorem states that if (L,≤) is a complete lattice and f:L→L is monotone, then the set of fixed points of f is also a complete lattice
This theorem guarantees the existence of least and greatest fixed points for monotone functions on complete lattices
It has important applications in order theory, logic, and computer science
a partially ordered set (P,≤) in which every directed subset D⊆P has a least upper bound () in P
Complete lattices are a special case of complete partial orders
Proof Outline
Constructive proof a proof that not only shows the existence of a mathematical object but also provides a method for finding or constructing it
The proof of the Knaster-Tarski theorem is constructive and proceeds as follows:
Define the set S={x∈L∣x≤f(x)}
Show that S is non-empty and closed under arbitrary infima (greatest lower bounds)
Let a=infS and show that a is a fixed point of f
Prove that a is the least fixed point of f
By duality, the set of fixed points also has a greatest element
Examples and Applications
In the lattice of subsets of a set X ordered by inclusion (P(X),⊆), the Knaster-Tarski theorem can be used to show the existence of least and greatest fixed points for monotone functions f:P(X)→P(X)
This has applications in the theory of inductive definitions and recursive constructions
The Knaster-Tarski theorem is used in the semantics of programming languages to define the meaning of recursive definitions and to prove the existence of least and greatest solutions to recursive equations
For example, in , the theorem is used to construct the denotational semantics of programming languages with recursive types and functions