5.3 Priming effects in media coverage

Priming effects in media shape how we evaluate political leaders and issues. By highlighting certain topics, media influences what criteria we use to judge politicians and policies, often without us realizing it.

This concept builds on agenda-setting theory, which says media attention affects what we think is important. Priming takes it further, showing how media coverage impacts our judgments and decision-making in politics.

Media Priming and Agenda-Setting

Cognitive Processes and Media Influence

Top images from around the web for Cognitive Processes and Media Influence

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What Is Cognition? | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What Is Cognition? | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Cognitive Processes and Media Influence

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What Is Cognition? | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What Is Cognition? | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Priming activates cognitive processes where exposure to one stimulus influences response to subsequent stimuli, often unconsciously
• In media studies, priming shapes criteria for audience evaluation of political leaders, issues, and events
• Agenda-setting theory proposes media attention to issues influences public perception of their importance
• Priming extends agenda-setting concept to how issues are used to evaluate political actors
• Accessibility model of priming suggests recently activated concepts are more likely used in subsequent judgments and decision-making
• Priming effects vary in duration
  • Temporary effects from single exposures
  • Cumulative effects from repeated exposures over time
• Individual differences impact priming strength (political knowledge, media literacy, personal issue relevance)

Framing and Priming Interactions

• Framing selects and emphasizes certain aspects of an issue
• Priming focuses on how frames activate and make considerations more accessible in audience evaluations
• Framing and priming work together to shape public opinion
  • Frames provide context and interpretation
  • Priming makes those interpretations more readily available for future judgments
• Example: Climate change framing as economic issue primes audience to evaluate policies based on economic impact
• Example: Crime news framing as racial issue primes audience to consider race in evaluations of criminal justice policies

Priming Effects on Political Evaluations

Criteria Alteration and Performance Evaluation

• Media priming alters criteria for public evaluation of political leaders, emphasizing certain traits or issues
• Performance priming hypothesis proposes media coverage of specific issues increases salience in public evaluations of leader competence
• Priming influences perception of leader character traits (trustworthiness, competence, empathy) based on media focus
• Issue ownership theory interacts with priming
  • Media coverage activates associations between political parties and perceived issue strengths
  • Example: Coverage of national security issues may prime voters to evaluate Republican candidates more favorably
• Negative priming in political coverage heightens attention to leader weaknesses or policy failures, potentially damaging approval ratings
• Cross-cutting exposure to diverse media sources can moderate priming effects, leading to more balanced evaluations

Factors Influencing Priming Intensity

• Priming effect intensity and duration on public evaluations influenced by various factors
  • Prominence of coverage (front-page news vs. brief mentions)
  • Repetition of messages across multiple media outlets
  • Emotional resonance of issues (personal impact on audience)
• Example: Intense coverage of economic downturn primes voters to prioritize economic competence in leader evaluations
• Example: Repeated coverage of foreign policy crises primes public to focus on diplomatic skills in assessing political leaders

Priming and Voter Behavior

Issue Salience and Candidate Evaluation

• Priming influences voter decision-making by increasing salience of certain issues or candidate attributes during campaigns
• Priming of specific policy issues shifts voter preferences towards candidates perceived as more competent in those areas
  • Example: Extensive coverage of healthcare reform primes voters to support candidates with strong healthcare platforms
• Media priming of personal characteristics affects voters' assessments of candidates' fitness for office
  • Example: Priming of leadership qualities during crisis situations may sway undecided voters
• Priming effects interact with partisan predispositions
  • Can reinforce existing preferences
  • In some cases, overcome partisan leanings when issues are highly salient

Strategic Priming and Electoral Dynamics

• Timing of media priming crucial in relation to elections
  • Stronger effects often observed closer to voting day
  • Example: Last-minute priming of scandal may significantly impact voter perceptions
• Priming influences voter turnout by highlighting issue importance or election stakes
  • Example: Priming of Supreme Court nominations may increase turnout among voters concerned about judicial appointments
• Strategic priming by political campaigns activates favorable associations among target voter groups
  • Example: Priming of economic growth in areas benefiting from specific policies
• Priming can affect different voter groups differently
  • Example: Issue priming may have stronger effects on undecided voters compared to strong partisans

Priming's Long-Term Effects on Politics

Attitude Formation and Polarization

• Cumulative exposure to media priming leads to formation of enduring political attitudes and beliefs over time
• Long-term priming effects contribute to polarization of political attitudes by consistently activating partisan schemas
• Repeated priming of certain issues leads to chronic accessibility, making them persistently influential in political evaluations
  • Example: Continuous priming of immigration issues may shape long-term voting patterns
• Media priming shapes individuals' political identity and party affiliation through repeated exposure to partisan-aligned issue frames
  • Example: Consistent priming of social issues may strengthen identification with specific political ideologies

Cynicism, Engagement, and Stereotypes

• Cultivation of political cynicism or engagement results from long-term exposure to certain types of media priming
  • Example: Persistent negative priming of political institutions may foster long-term distrust in government
• Priming effects contribute to formation and maintenance of political stereotypes and biases over extended periods
  • Example: Repeated priming of gender stereotypes in political coverage may influence long-term perceptions of female candidates
• Interaction between media priming and real-world events leads to lasting changes in public opinion on political issues and institutions
  • Example: Priming of economic indicators during recessions may have long-term effects on economic policy preferences
• Long-term priming can create enduring associations between political parties and specific issues or values
  • Example: Consistent priming of environmental issues may create lasting perceptions of party competence in this area