Least squares estimation using matrices is a powerful method for analyzing linear relationships between variables. It involves solving normal equations to find parameter estimates that minimize the sum of squared residuals, providing efficient and interpretable results.
The matrix approach offers computational advantages and yields estimators with desirable properties like and . Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying linear regression effectively and interpreting results accurately in various fields of study.
Least squares estimates
Solving the normal equations
Top images from around the web for Solving the normal equations
Least Squares with the Moore-Penrose Inverse View original
Is this image relevant?
How do you calculate the Ordinary Least Squares estimated coefficients in a Multiple Regression ... View original
Least Squares with the Moore-Penrose Inverse View original
Is this image relevant?
How do you calculate the Ordinary Least Squares estimated coefficients in a Multiple Regression ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
The normal equations are a set of linear equations that can be solved to obtain the least squares estimates of the regression parameters in a linear regression model
Derived by minimizing the sum of squared residuals, which measures the difference between the observed values and the predicted values from the regression model
In matrix notation, the normal equations are expressed as (X′X)β=X′y, where:
X is the
X′ is the transpose of X
y is the vector of observed values
β is the vector of regression parameters to be estimated
The solution to the normal equations is given by β^=(X′X)−1X′y, where:
β^ represents the least squares estimates of the regression parameters
(X′X)−1 is the inverse of the matrix product X′X
The existence of (X′X)−1 requires that the columns of X are linearly independent, ensuring a unique solution to the normal equations
The matrix approach to solving the normal equations offers computational efficiency, particularly when dealing with a large number of predictor variables or observations
Interpreting the estimates
The least squares estimates obtained from the matrix approach represent the values of the regression parameters that minimize the sum of squared residuals
Each element in the β^ vector corresponds to a specific regression parameter, such as the intercept or the coefficient associated with a predictor variable
The intercept estimate represents the expected value of the response variable when all predictor variables are zero, assuming it is meaningful within the context of the problem
The coefficient estimates represent the change in the expected value of the response variable for a one-unit increase in the corresponding predictor variable, holding all other predictors constant
The signs of the coefficient estimates indicate the direction of the relationship between the predictor variables and the response variable:
Positive values indicate a positive relationship
Negative values indicate a negative relationship
The magnitude of the coefficient estimates provides information about the strength of the relationship between the predictor variables and the response variable, with larger absolute values indicating a stronger relationship
Interpreting the least squares estimates should be done within the context of the problem and considering the units of measurement for the variables involved
Fitted values and residuals
Calculating fitted values and residuals
The fitted values, denoted as y^, are the predicted values of the response variable obtained from the regression model using the least squares estimates of the parameters
In matrix notation, the fitted values can be calculated as y^=Xβ^, where:
X is the design matrix
β^ is the vector of least squares estimates
The residuals, denoted as e, are the differences between the observed values of the response variable and the fitted values obtained from the regression model
In matrix notation, the residuals can be calculated as e=y−y^, where:
y is the vector of observed values
y^ is the vector of fitted values
The sum of squared residuals, denoted as SSR, measures the discrepancy between the observed values and the fitted values and can be calculated as SSR=e′e, where e′ is the transpose of the residual vector
Computational efficiency
The matrix approach to calculating the fitted values and residuals offers computational efficiency
It allows for easy manipulation of the results for further analysis, such as calculating goodness-of-fit measures or conducting diagnostic tests
Example: Calculating the coefficient of determination (R2) using the fitted values and residuals
R2=1−SSTSSR, where SST is the total sum of squares
Properties of estimators
Desirable properties
The least squares estimators obtained from the matrix approach have several desirable properties, making them widely used in linear regression analysis
Unbiasedness: The least squares estimators are unbiased, meaning that the expected value of the estimators is equal to the true value of the parameters being estimated, E(β^)=β
Consistency: As the sample size increases, the least squares estimators converge in probability to the true value of the parameters, plim(β^)=β
Efficiency: Among all linear unbiased estimators, the least squares estimators have the smallest variance, making them the best linear unbiased estimators (BLUE) under certain assumptions
The states that the least squares estimators are BLUE when the errors are uncorrelated, have constant variance (homoscedasticity), and have a mean of zero
Normality and assumptions
If the errors are normally distributed, the least squares estimators are also normally distributed, enabling the construction of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests based on the normal distribution
The properties of the least squares estimators in the matrix context are derived using the assumptions of the classical linear regression model, such as:
Linearity
Independence
Homoscedasticity
Normality of errors
Violations of these assumptions can affect the properties of the least squares estimators and may require the use of alternative estimation methods or remedial measures to address the issues
Example: Using robust standard errors or transforming variables to address heteroscedasticity