The Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control explains how shape behavior throughout life. It suggests that strong connections to family, school, work, and relationships can prevent criminal activity and encourage desistance.
This theory highlights how informal control changes as we age. It explores how childhood bonds, adult relationships, and life events like marriage or parenthood can influence criminal trajectories and create for positive change.
Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control
Informal control across life stages
Top images from around the web for Informal control across life stages
Chapter 7. Deviance, Crime, and Social Control – Introduction to Sociology – 2nd Canadian Edition View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Pathways From Family Violence to Adolescent Violence: Examining the Mediating Mechanisms View original
Is this image relevant?
Theories of Human Development | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 7. Deviance, Crime, and Social Control – Introduction to Sociology – 2nd Canadian Edition View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Pathways From Family Violence to Adolescent Violence: Examining the Mediating Mechanisms View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Informal control across life stages
Chapter 7. Deviance, Crime, and Social Control – Introduction to Sociology – 2nd Canadian Edition View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Pathways From Family Violence to Adolescent Violence: Examining the Mediating Mechanisms View original
Is this image relevant?
Theories of Human Development | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 7. Deviance, Crime, and Social Control – Introduction to Sociology – 2nd Canadian Edition View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Pathways From Family Violence to Adolescent Violence: Examining the Mediating Mechanisms View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Informal social control shapes behavior through social bonds, relationships, and influences outside formal institutions
Strength and nature of these bonds vary across life stages, impacting likelihood of criminal behavior
Childhood and
Family bonds (attachment to parents, parental supervision) prevent delinquency
School bonds (commitment to education, involvement in activities) reduce criminal risk
Early adulthood
Employment and job stability act as informal controls, reducing criminal likelihood
Marriage and romantic relationships serve as turning points, encouraging crime desistance
Middle and late adulthood
Continued employment and job satisfaction maintain informal social control
Family responsibilities (parenting, caregiving) deter criminal behavior
Age-graded bonds in criminal trajectories
Age-graded social bonds change in nature and strength across life stages
Individuals with strong, prosocial bonds at each stage less likely to engage in crime
Criminal trajectories influenced by development and maintenance of bonds over time
Consistently weak social bonds across stages linked to persistent criminal behavior
Strong bonds developed in adulthood, despite weak childhood bonds, may lead to delayed crime desistance
Strong childhood bonds that weaken in adulthood may result in adult-onset criminal behavior
Turning points for criminal desistance
Turning points are significant life events or experiences that alter criminal trajectories
These events strengthen or weaken social bonds, influencing likelihood of crime desistance
Turning points promoting desistance include:
Marriage and formation of stable romantic relationships
Gaining stable employment or experiencing job satisfaction
Military service or other structured, prosocial activities
Parenthood and development of family responsibilities
Turning points weakening social bonds (divorce, job loss) may increase risk of continued criminal behavior
Limitations of age-graded theory
May not adequately address influence of structural factors (poverty, inequality) on criminal behavior
Places strong emphasis on social bonds, potentially overlooking role of individual agency and decision-making
May not fully account for diverse experiences and trajectories of individuals from different cultural backgrounds
Focuses primarily on influence of informal social control, potentially underestimating impact of formal institutions and interventions
May not sufficiently explain onset and desistance of criminal behavior for all individuals, as some may not follow predicted trajectories based on social bonds