6.2 Designing for comfort and reducing motion sickness

Designing for comfort in VR is crucial for creating enjoyable experiences. Factors like sensory conflicts, latency, and ergonomics can impact user comfort. Designers must consider these elements to minimize discomfort and motion sickness.

Reducing motion sickness involves managing vestibular-visual mismatches, vection, and acceleration. Strategies like limiting field of view, reducing visual clutter, and incorporating static reference points can enhance comfort. User control and technological solutions also play key roles in improving VR experiences.

Factors affecting comfort

• Understanding the various factors that impact user comfort is crucial for creating effective and enjoyable VR experiences
• Designers must consider the complex interplay between sensory input, hardware limitations, and ergonomic factors to minimize discomfort and motion sickness

Sensory conflicts

Top images from around the web for Sensory conflicts

• 

  Frontiers | Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness | Neurology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Toward Predicting Motion Sickness Using Virtual Reality and a Moving Platform ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness | Neurology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Sensory conflicts

• 

  Frontiers | Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness | Neurology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Toward Predicting Motion Sickness Using Virtual Reality and a Moving Platform ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness | Neurology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Sensory conflicts occur when the visual information in VR does not match the user's vestibular and proprioceptive senses
• Discrepancies between what the user sees and what their body feels can lead to disorientation and motion sickness
• Examples of sensory conflicts include:
  • Perceived motion in VR without corresponding physical movement (vection)
  • Inconsistencies between head movements and visual updates (latency)

Latency and frame rates

• Latency refers to the delay between a user's actions and the corresponding visual updates in the VR display
• High latency can cause a noticeable lag between head movements and the virtual environment, leading to discomfort and disorientation
• Low frame rates (below 60 FPS) can also contribute to motion sickness by creating a stuttering or juddering effect
• Maintaining consistent, high frame rates (90+ FPS) and minimizing latency are essential for reducing motion sickness and improving comfort

Ergonomic considerations

• Ergonomic factors, such as the weight and fit of the VR headset, can significantly impact user comfort during extended sessions
• Poorly designed or ill-fitting headsets can cause physical strain on the neck, face, and eyes
• Considerations for ergonomic design include:
  • Adjustable straps and interpupillary distance (IPD) settings to accommodate different head sizes and shapes
  • Balanced weight distribution to minimize neck strain
  • Adequate padding and ventilation to prevent facial pressure and overheating

Reducing motion sickness

• Motion sickness is a common issue in VR, caused by discrepancies between visual and vestibular information
• Designers must employ various strategies to minimize the likelihood and severity of motion sickness for users

Vestibular vs visual mismatch

• Motion sickness often results from a mismatch between the vestibular system (responsible for balance and spatial orientation) and the visual information in VR
• When the vestibular system detects no motion, but the visual system perceives movement, the conflict can lead to discomfort and nausea
• Minimizing this mismatch by aligning visual and vestibular cues is crucial for reducing motion sickness

Vection and self-motion illusions

• Vection refers to the illusion of self-motion induced by visual stimuli, even when the user is stationary
• In VR, vection can be triggered by large-scale movements or optic flow patterns in the virtual environment
• While vection can enhance immersion, it can also contribute to motion sickness if not managed carefully
• Designers can minimize vection-induced discomfort by:
  • Limiting the speed and acceleration of virtual movements
  • Providing visual cues that anchor the user's perspective (e.g., cockpits, frames)

Minimizing acceleration and rotation

• Rapid acceleration, deceleration, and rotational movements in VR can exacerbate motion sickness by disrupting the vestibular system
• Designers should avoid sudden or extreme changes in motion and instead opt for slower, more gradual transitions
• Techniques for minimizing problematic motion include:
  • Implementing smooth acceleration and deceleration curves
  • Limiting the speed and intensity of rotational movements
  • Providing user-controlled locomotion options (e.g., teleportation, snap turning)

Design strategies for comfort

• Designers can employ various strategies to promote comfort and reduce motion sickness in VR experiences
• These strategies focus on optimizing visual elements, providing user control, and creating stable reference points within the virtual environment

Limiting field of view

• Reducing the user's field of view (FOV) during motion can help minimize motion sickness by decreasing the amount of peripheral visual information
• Techniques for limiting FOV include:
  • Applying a vignette or "tunneling" effect during movement
  • Dynamically adjusting the FOV based on the user's motion speed
• Gradually expanding the FOV as the user acclimates to the experience can help maintain immersion while prioritizing comfort

Reducing visual clutter

• Complex or cluttered visual environments can overwhelm the user and contribute to motion sickness
• Designers should strive for visual simplicity and clarity, especially during high-motion sequences
• Strategies for reducing visual clutter include:
  • Using minimalistic, low-polygon models and textures
  • Avoiding excessive particle effects, motion blur, or other visual noise
  • Employing clear color contrasts and readable text

Incorporating static reference points

• Providing stable visual reference points within the virtual environment can help ground the user and reduce disorientation
• Examples of static reference points include:
  • Visible horizon lines or grids
  • Persistent user interface elements (e.g., dashboards, HUDs)
  • Stationary objects or landmarks within the virtual scene
• These reference points offer a sense of stability and help users maintain their bearings during motion

Leveraging user control and agency

• Giving users control over their movement and interactions in VR can significantly reduce motion sickness
• When users initiate and control their own motion, the vestibular and visual cues are more likely to align, minimizing sensory conflicts
• Strategies for enhancing user control include:
  • Implementing user-driven locomotion methods (e.g., teleportation, smooth locomotion with adjustable speed)
  • Providing multiple comfort options and allowing users to customize their experience
  • Designing interactions that rely on natural, body-based movements rather than artificial or unexpected motion

Technological solutions

• Advancements in VR hardware and software have led to the development of technological solutions that can help mitigate motion sickness and improve user comfort
• These solutions focus on optimizing display performance, reducing latency, and enhancing tracking accuracy

Low-persistence displays

• Low-persistence displays reduce motion blur and judder by illuminating each pixel for a shorter duration
• By minimizing the time pixels remain lit, low-persistence displays create a clearer, more stable image during head movement
• This technology helps to reduce the perception of lag and motion artifacts, which can contribute to motion sickness

Asynchronous time warp

• Asynchronous time warp (ATW) is a software technique that reduces the perceived latency between head movement and visual updates
• ATW works by warping the rendered frame based on the most recent head tracking data, even if the next frame is not yet ready
• By continuously updating the display to match the user's head position, ATW minimizes the visual-vestibular mismatch and improves overall comfort

Predictive tracking algorithms

• Predictive tracking algorithms aim to reduce latency by estimating the user's future head position based on their current movement
• By anticipating the user's next position and orientation, the system can preemptively update the display, minimizing the perceived lag
• Advanced predictive algorithms can also account for factors such as acceleration and velocity to provide more accurate estimates
• The combination of low-persistence displays, ATW, and predictive tracking helps to create a more seamless and comfortable VR experience

User adaptation and acclimation

• Individual users may have different levels of sensitivity to motion sickness in VR, and some may require time to adapt and acclimate to the experience
• Designers can facilitate this process by implementing strategies that allow users to gradually build their tolerance and comfort level

Gradual exposure techniques

• Gradual exposure involves slowly introducing users to more intense or motion-rich VR experiences over time
• This approach allows users to build up their tolerance and adapt to the sensory challenges of VR at their own pace
• Techniques for gradual exposure include:
  • Offering a range of comfort settings that users can adjust as they acclimate
  • Providing shorter, less intense VR sessions initially and gradually increasing the duration and intensity
  • Incorporating rest breaks or "comfort zones" within the experience to allow users to reorient themselves

Habituation and desensitization

• Habituation refers to the process of becoming accustomed to a stimulus over repeated exposures, leading to a decreased response
• In the context of VR, users may habituate to the sensory conflicts and motion cues that initially caused discomfort
• Desensitization is a related process in which users become less sensitive to motion sickness triggers through repeated, controlled exposure
• Designers can support habituation and desensitization by:
  • Encouraging regular, short VR sessions to help users build up their tolerance
  • Providing consistent and predictable motion cues to facilitate adaptation
  • Offering a variety of VR experiences with different levels of intensity to promote generalization of comfort skills

Individual differences in susceptibility

• It is important to recognize that individuals vary in their susceptibility to motion sickness and their ability to adapt to VR
• Factors such as age, gender, and prior experience with motion-rich activities (e.g., gaming, theme park rides) can influence a user's comfort level
• Designers should accommodate these individual differences by:
  • Offering a wide range of comfort settings and customization options
  • Providing clear information about the intensity and motion content of VR experiences
  • Allowing users to self-select experiences based on their comfort level and gradually progress at their own pace

Evaluating comfort in VR experiences

• To create comfortable and accessible VR experiences, designers must regularly evaluate and assess user comfort throughout the development process
• This evaluation can involve a combination of subjective measures, objective indicators, and user testing methods

Subjective measures and questionnaires

• Subjective measures involve collecting self-reported data from users about their comfort level and motion sickness symptoms
• Standardized questionnaires, such as the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) or the Virtual Reality Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ), can be used to assess user comfort
• These questionnaires typically ask users to rate the severity of various symptoms, such as nausea, disorientation, and eye strain, on a scale
• Subjective measures provide valuable insights into users' perceptions and experiences, helping designers identify comfort issues and areas for improvement

Objective physiological indicators

• Objective physiological indicators can be used to measure users' physical responses to VR experiences, providing a more quantitative assessment of comfort
• Examples of physiological indicators include:
  • Heart rate and heart rate variability
  • Galvanic skin response (GSR) to measure sweat and arousal
  • Eye tracking to detect visual strain or abnormal eye movements
• By monitoring these indicators during VR sessions, designers can identify moments of heightened discomfort or physiological stress and make appropriate adjustments

Usability testing and user feedback

• Usability testing involves observing users as they interact with a VR experience and gathering their feedback and insights
• This process can help designers identify comfort issues, usability problems, and areas where the experience can be improved
• Methods for conducting usability testing in VR include:
  • In-person observation and interviews
  • Remote testing using screen-sharing and video conferencing tools
  • Automated data collection through in-app metrics and analytics
• User feedback, both during and after the VR experience, provides valuable qualitative data that can inform design iterations and comfort optimizations

Best practices and guidelines

• To ensure a high standard of comfort and accessibility in VR, designers should adhere to established best practices and guidelines within the industry
• These guidelines provide a framework for creating VR experiences that prioritize user well-being and minimize the risk of motion sickness

Industry standards and recommendations

• Industry organizations, such as the VR/AR Association (VRARA) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), have developed standards and recommendations for VR comfort and safety
• These standards cover various aspects of VR design, including:
  • Visual display requirements (e.g., refresh rates, resolution)
  • Tracking and latency recommendations
  • Ergonomic and accessibility guidelines
• Adhering to these industry standards helps ensure a baseline level of comfort and quality across VR experiences

Platform-specific considerations

• Different VR platforms (e.g., Oculus, SteamVR, PlayStation VR) may have specific guidelines and best practices for optimizing comfort on their respective hardware
• Designers should familiarize themselves with the unique capabilities, limitations, and comfort features of each platform they develop for
• Platform-specific considerations may include:
  • Hardware-specific performance targets (e.g., frame rates, resolutions)
  • Controller and input device ergonomics
  • Built-in comfort settings and user preferences

Designing for diverse user populations

• VR experiences should be designed with a diverse range of users in mind, considering factors such as age, abilities, and prior experience with VR
• Designers should strive to create inclusive and accessible VR experiences that accommodate different comfort levels and physical abilities
• Best practices for designing for diverse user populations include:
  • Providing multiple input methods and control schemes
  • Offering a range of comfort settings and customization options
  • Ensuring clear and concise instructions and onboarding processes
  • Conducting user testing with a diverse group of participants to identify potential barriers or comfort issues
• By prioritizing inclusivity and accessibility, designers can create VR experiences that are welcoming and comfortable for a wide range of users