6.2 Diversification (related and unrelated)

Corporate-level strategies shape a company's overall direction. Diversification, a key strategy, involves expanding into new business areas. This can be related (similar to current operations) or unrelated (distinct from existing business), each with unique benefits and challenges.

Firms pursue diversification to leverage resources, reduce risk, or tap new markets. Related diversification aims for synergies, while unrelated diversification spreads risk. Understanding these approaches helps companies make smart growth decisions and manage their business portfolios effectively.

Related vs Unrelated Diversification

Characteristics and Objectives

Top images from around the web for Characteristics and Objectives

• 

  Matrice d'Ansoff — Wikipédia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategy Formulation | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategic Opportunity Matrix | Principles of Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Matrice d'Ansoff — Wikipédia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategy Formulation | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Characteristics and Objectives

• 

  Matrice d'Ansoff — Wikipédia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategy Formulation | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategic Opportunity Matrix | Principles of Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Matrice d'Ansoff — Wikipédia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategy Formulation | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Related diversification involves expanding into new businesses that share commonalities or synergies with a firm's existing business (similar products, markets, or technologies)
• Unrelated diversification involves entering into new businesses that are distinctly different from a firm's current operations, with no direct linkages or overlaps
• Related diversification allows firms to leverage existing resources and capabilities
• Unrelated diversification aims to spread risk across unrelated industries (conglomerates like General Electric)

Motivations and Implications

• Firms may pursue related diversification to achieve economies of scope (sharing R&D, manufacturing, or marketing resources across businesses)
• Unrelated diversification is often driven by financial motives like risk reduction or cross-subsidization (using profits from one business to support another)
• Related diversification enables knowledge transfer and skill sharing across businesses
• Unrelated diversification requires developing new competencies and managing diverse business portfolios

Synergies and Risks of Diversification

Potential Synergies

• Synergies in diversification can arise from sharing resources (R&D, manufacturing), transferring skills and knowledge, or leveraging brand reputation across businesses
• Operational synergies can lead to cost savings through economies of scale or scope (shared production facilities or distribution networks)
• Financial synergies can improve access to capital or reduce the cost of borrowing (diversified revenue streams and risk profile)
• Market power synergies can increase bargaining power with suppliers or customers (bundling products or services)

Risks and Challenges

• Diversification carries risks such as overestimating synergies, diverting management attention, or creating organizational complexity that hinders performance
• Unrelated diversification can be particularly risky if the firm lacks the necessary expertise or resources to compete effectively in the new industry
• Excessive diversification can lead to loss of strategic focus and dilution of core competencies
• Integrating and managing diverse businesses can strain organizational resources and capabilities
• Diversification may create internal conflicts and competition for resources among business units

Impact of Diversification on Performance

Performance Outcomes and Contingencies

• The relationship between diversification and firm performance is complex and depends on various factors (type and extent of diversification, industry characteristics, firm-specific resources)
• Related diversification is generally associated with better performance outcomes compared to unrelated diversification, as it allows firms to exploit synergies and leverage core competencies
• However, excessive diversification (either related or unrelated) can lead to diminishing returns and negative performance consequences due to increased complexity, coordination costs, and management challenges
• The performance impact of diversification also depends on the firm's ability to effectively integrate and manage the new businesses, as well as the competitive dynamics in the target industries

Empirical Evidence and Strategic Implications

• Empirical research on the diversification-performance relationship has yielded mixed results, highlighting the need for careful strategic analysis and execution
• Some studies find a positive relationship between related diversification and performance (higher profitability, innovation, and market valuation)
• Other studies suggest that unrelated diversification can lead to lower performance and shareholder value (conglomerate discount)
• Firms need to carefully assess the potential synergies, risks, and performance implications of diversification strategies based on their unique resources, capabilities, and market conditions
• Successful diversification requires effective strategic planning, due diligence, and post-merger integration to realize intended synergies and performance benefits

Core Competencies in Diversification

Defining and Leveraging Core Competencies

• Core competencies are the unique combination of skills, knowledge, and resources that provide a firm with a sustainable competitive advantage
• Identifying and leveraging core competencies is crucial for successful diversification, as it allows firms to enter new businesses where they can create value and differentiate themselves from competitors
• Related diversification should be based on extending or replicating core competencies in adjacent markets or industries (Honda's engines in automobiles and power equipment)
• Unrelated diversification may involve acquiring new competencies or applying existing ones in novel ways (Virgin Group's brand extension across diverse businesses)

Assessing Fit and Sustainability

• Firms should assess the transferability and applicability of their core competencies to potential diversification opportunities, considering factors such as market attractiveness, entry barriers, and competitive intensity
• Diversification strategies that are not grounded in core competencies can lead to a lack of focus, dilution of competitive advantage, and suboptimal resource allocation
• Effective diversification requires continuous development and adaptation of core competencies to maintain relevance and competitiveness in changing business environments
• Firms need to balance the exploitation of existing competencies with the exploration of new ones to sustain long-term competitive advantage through diversification
• Regular assessment and refinement of core competencies is essential to ensure their ongoing value creation potential in diversified business portfolios