Frequency Response Functions (FRFs) are key tools in structural health monitoring. They show how structures react to forces at different frequencies, helping detect damage by comparing healthy and potentially damaged states. FRFs are sensitive to changes in stiffness, mass, and damping.
Measuring FRFs involves exciting structures and recording responses. Various techniques, like transmissibility and , analyze FRF data to spot damage. These methods can detect different damage types but depend on measurement quality and the ability to distinguish damage from environmental changes.
Frequency Response Function (FRF) Fundamentals
Frequency response functions in damage detection
Top images from around the web for Frequency response functions in damage detection
Frontiers | Structural Health Monitoring of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Regularly Conducted ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Structural Health Monitoring of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Regularly Conducted ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Structural Health Monitoring of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Regularly Conducted ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Structural Health Monitoring of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Regularly Conducted ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Frequency response functions in damage detection
Frontiers | Structural Health Monitoring of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Regularly Conducted ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Structural Health Monitoring of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Regularly Conducted ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Structural Health Monitoring of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Regularly Conducted ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Structural Health Monitoring of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Regularly Conducted ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
FRFs represent a system's input-output relationship in the frequency domain describing how a structure responds to excitation forces at different frequencies (impact hammers, shakers) and capturing its dynamic behavior
Compare FRFs of a healthy structure to those of a potentially damaged structure to indicate the presence, location, and severity of damage as changes in FRFs are sensitive to variations in structural properties such as stiffness, mass, and damping
FRF measurement for structural monitoring
Excite the structure with a known input force (impact hammers, shakers, ambient vibrations) and measure the output response using or laser vibrometers
Calculate FRFs by dividing the output response by the input force in the frequency domain requiring of time-domain signals and assess the quality of the FRF measurements using the coherence function
Compare the FRFs of the structure in its current state to a baseline or reference state obtained from the healthy structure or a finite element model using statistical methods and pattern recognition techniques to identify significant changes
FRF-Based Damage Detection Techniques
Comparison of FRF-based detection techniques
Ratio of FRFs measured at different locations on the structure sensitive to changes in the dynamic behavior between the measurement points
Do not require knowledge of the input force and can be used with ambient excitation but may not be sensitive to localized damage and require multiple measurement points
Damage index methods
Quantify the difference between the FRFs of the healthy and potentially damaged structure ( COMAC, FRAC)
Provide a scalar value indicating the degree of damage and can be used to localize damage but require a baseline FRF of the healthy structure and may be sensitive to environmental and operational variations
Robustness of FRF methods for damage types
Effective in detecting various types of damage
Cracks, delaminations, and disbonds in composite structures
Corrosion and fatigue damage in metal structures
Loosening of bolted connections and damage to joints
Robustness depends on
Quality and repeatability of the FRF measurements
Sensitivity of the FRFs to the specific type and location of damage
Ability to distinguish damage-induced changes from environmental and operational variations
Applicability depends on the structure and monitoring conditions
More suitable for structures with well-defined dynamic behavior and limited environmental variability
May require a dense sensor network for large or complex structures
Update baseline FRFs periodically to account for long-term changes in the structure