Network centrality measures like Katz and HITS help us understand node importance in complex networks. considers both direct and indirect connections, assigning scores based on weighted walks. It's useful for social networks and citation analysis.
HITS, developed for web page ranking, assigns hub and authority scores to nodes. It focuses on query-specific subgraphs, making it ideal for topic-based information retrieval. Both methods offer unique insights into network structure and node significance.
Katz Centrality and its Recursiveness
Concept and Calculation
Top images from around the web for Concept and Calculation
Centrality Measures Based on Matrix Functions View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of Interaction Networks Weighted by Node Centrality View original
Is this image relevant?
Centrality Measures Based on Matrix Functions View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of Interaction Networks Weighted by Node Centrality View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Concept and Calculation
Centrality Measures Based on Matrix Functions View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of Interaction Networks Weighted by Node Centrality View original
Is this image relevant?
Centrality Measures Based on Matrix Functions View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of Interaction Networks Weighted by Node Centrality View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Measures node importance in a network considering both direct and indirect connections
Calculates a weighted sum of walks of all lengths from a node to other nodes
Represented by the formula x=αAx+β1
x denotes the centrality vector
A represents the adjacency matrix
α signifies the attenuation factor
β indicates the bias term
Attenuation factor α controls importance of longer walks vs shorter ones
Typically set between 0 and reciprocal of largest eigenvalue of A
Generalizes by incorporating a bias term
Ensures non-zero scores for all nodes, even those with no outgoing edges (sinks)
Applications and Computation
Particularly useful for directed networks (social media connections, citation networks)
Handles networks with sinks effectively
Computed through two main methods
Iterative approach
Matrix inversion
Choice of computation method depends on
Network size (number of nodes and edges)
Available computational resources (processing power, memory)
HITS Algorithm and its Components
Algorithm Overview
Developed by for link analysis and web page rating
Operates on a focused subgraph of the web
Typically constructed from text-based search query results
Assigns two scores to each node (web page)
Employs an iterative process
Alternates between updating hub and authority scores
Continues until convergence or reaching a specified iteration limit
Normalizes scores after each iteration
Prevents numerical overflow
Ensures algorithm convergence
Mathematical Foundation
Utilizes adjacency matrix A and its transpose A^T in update equations
Represents an eigenvector problem
Final hub vector corresponds to principal eigenvector of A^T A
Final authority vector aligns with principal eigenvector of AA^T
Update equations for scores
Hub scores: h=Aa
Authority scores: a=ATh
A denotes the adjacency matrix of the network
Hub vs Authority Scores
Score Definitions and Relationships
Hub scores measure a node's effectiveness in pointing to high-quality authority pages
Proportional to sum of authority scores of nodes it points to
Authority scores indicate a node's value based on quality of hubs pointing to it
Proportional to sum of hub scores of nodes pointing to it