6.4 Net neutrality and internet regulation

Net neutrality is a hot-button issue in internet regulation. It's all about keeping the internet fair and open for everyone. ISPs shouldn't be able to play favorites with content or charge extra for faster access.

The debate over net neutrality has big implications for innovation and consumer choice online. Supporters say it's crucial for a level playing field, while critics argue it stifles investment in networks. The FCC's flip-flopping stance has only fueled the controversy.

Net neutrality: principle and significance

Definition and core principles

Top images from around the web for Definition and core principles

• 

  File:Network neutrality symbol.png - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Infographic: European Parliament votes on net neutrality - EDRi View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Net neutrality - now it is the regulators' turn to bring clarity - EDRi View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Network neutrality symbol.png - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Infographic: European Parliament votes on net neutrality - EDRi View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition and core principles

• 

  File:Network neutrality symbol.png - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Infographic: European Parliament votes on net neutrality - EDRi View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Net neutrality - now it is the regulators' turn to bring clarity - EDRi View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Network neutrality symbol.png - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Infographic: European Parliament votes on net neutrality - EDRi View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all internet traffic equally without discriminating or charging differently based on content, user, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication
• Under net neutrality, ISPs are prohibited from intentionally blocking, slowing down, or charging money for specific online content
• The core principles of net neutrality ensure that all internet users have equal access to online content and services regardless of their ISP

Significance for internet users and content providers

• Net neutrality is significant for internet users because it ensures equal access to online content and services, preventing ISPs from creating "fast lanes" for content providers who pay more or "slow lanes" for those who don't
  • Without net neutrality, users could face limited access to certain websites or services if their ISP decides to block or slow down that content
  • Users may also have to pay more for access to certain content or services if ISPs can charge content providers for faster access
• For content providers, net neutrality is crucial because it ensures a level playing field, allowing small startups and independent creators to compete with larger, well-established companies without facing discrimination or additional costs from ISPs
  • Without net neutrality, smaller content providers may struggle to reach audiences if they cannot afford to pay ISPs for faster access or preferential treatment
  • This could lead to a less diverse and innovative online ecosystem, as only larger, well-funded companies would be able to effectively compete

Arguments for vs against net neutrality

Arguments in favor of net neutrality regulations

• Proponents of net neutrality argue that it is essential for maintaining an open and fair internet, promoting innovation, and protecting freedom of speech online
  • They contend that without net neutrality, ISPs could censor content, slow down or block competitors' services, or charge extra fees for faster access, ultimately harming consumers and stifling competition
  • Net neutrality ensures that all voices, regardless of their size or resources, have an equal opportunity to be heard online
• Supporters also argue that net neutrality is crucial for innovation, as it allows new startups and ideas to compete on a level playing field with established players
  • Without net neutrality, ISPs could create barriers to entry for new companies by charging them for access to users or prioritizing the content of larger, paying competitors
  • This could lead to a less dynamic and innovative internet, as fewer new ideas and services would be able to break through

Arguments against net neutrality regulations

• Opponents of net neutrality regulations, primarily ISPs and telecom companies, argue that such rules stifle innovation and discourage investment in network infrastructure
  • They claim that net neutrality prevents them from offering tailored services and managing network traffic efficiently, which could lead to slower speeds and reduced quality of service for users
  • ISPs argue that without the ability to charge for prioritized access, they have less incentive to invest in expanding and upgrading their networks
• Some critics also argue that net neutrality regulations amount to government overreach and that the internet should be left to market forces and self-regulation
  • They contend that the internet has flourished without strict net neutrality rules in the past and that market competition among ISPs will ensure that consumers are protected and innovation continues
  • Opponents also argue that net neutrality regulations could lead to increased costs for consumers, as ISPs would have to find other ways to recoup their investments in network infrastructure

FCC's role in regulating internet access

FCC's authority and the 2015 Open Internet Order

• The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is the primary agency responsible for regulating communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in the United States, including internet service providers
• In 2015, under the Obama administration, the FCC adopted the Open Internet Order, which reclassified broadband internet as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act
  • This reclassification allowed the FCC to enforce strict net neutrality rules, prohibiting ISPs from blocking, throttling, or prioritizing internet traffic for payment
  • The 2015 order ensured a level playing field for all online content and services, protecting the open internet and promoting innovation and competition

2017 repeal of net neutrality rules

• In 2017, under the Trump administration, the FCC voted to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order, reclassifying broadband internet as an information service under Title I of the Communications Act
  • This reclassification provided for lighter regulation of ISPs and effectively eliminated the FCC's authority to enforce net neutrality rules
  • Instead, the repeal required ISPs to disclose their practices and subjected them to oversight by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for any anti-competitive behavior
• The repeal of net neutrality rules sparked controversy and legal challenges, with proponents arguing that it would harm consumers, stifle innovation, and lead to a less open and competitive internet
  • Several states, such as California and Washington, have since enacted their own net neutrality laws to protect consumers and ensure an open internet within their borders
  • The debate over net neutrality and the FCC's role in regulating internet access continues, with some lawmakers and advocates pushing for federal legislation to restore net neutrality protections

Consequences of net neutrality changes

Impact on innovation and competition

• The repeal of net neutrality rules has raised concerns about the potential consequences for innovation and competition in the online ecosystem
• Without net neutrality protections, ISPs could prioritize their own content or services over those of competitors, creating an unfair advantage and stifling innovation by smaller players who may not be able to afford preferential treatment
  • For example, an ISP that also owns a streaming video service could prioritize its own content over that of competitors like Netflix or Hulu, making it harder for those services to reach users
• The absence of net neutrality could also lead to reduced competition, as larger, well-established companies with deep pockets could pay for faster access or preferential treatment, making it harder for new entrants to compete on a level playing field
  • This could lead to a less dynamic and innovative internet, as fewer new ideas and services would be able to break through and challenge established players

Effects on consumer choice and costs

• Consumers may face limited choices and higher costs as a result of changes to net neutrality policies
• Without net neutrality, ISPs could charge content providers more for faster access, leading to increased prices for online services or subscriptions
  • For example, if Netflix has to pay more to ISPs for fast, reliable access to users, it may pass those costs on to consumers in the form of higher subscription fees
• ISPs could also bundle certain services with internet plans, forcing consumers to pay for content they may not want or need in order to access the internet
  • This could limit consumer choice and lead to higher costs, as users would have fewer options for accessing the content and services they desire
• The repeal of net neutrality could also have implications for freedom of speech and the diversity of voices online, as ISPs could potentially censor or prioritize content based on their own business interests or political preferences
  • This could lead to a less open and diverse internet, where certain voices and perspectives are silenced or marginalized based on the preferences of ISPs and their partners