6.1 Teleoperation architectures and control schemes

Teleoperation systems bridge the gap between human operators and remote environments. They consist of master and slave devices connected by communication channels, enabling control and feedback across distances. This setup allows for remote manipulation in various fields, from surgery to space exploration.

Control architectures in teleoperation balance stability, performance, and transparency. Position-based, force-based, and impedance control schemes each offer unique advantages and challenges. Time delay compensation and environmental interaction handling are crucial for effective teleoperation across long distances or in complex settings.

Teleoperation System Components

Master and Slave Devices

Top images from around the web for Master and Slave Devices

• 

  Frontiers | Model-Augmented Haptic Telemanipulation: Concept, Retrospective Overview, and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Surgical Robot Teleoperation Framework for Providing Haptic Feedback Incorporating ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Multi-Lateral Teleoperation Based on Multi-Agent Framework: Application to ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Model-Augmented Haptic Telemanipulation: Concept, Retrospective Overview, and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Surgical Robot Teleoperation Framework for Providing Haptic Feedback Incorporating ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Master and Slave Devices

• 

  Frontiers | Model-Augmented Haptic Telemanipulation: Concept, Retrospective Overview, and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Surgical Robot Teleoperation Framework for Providing Haptic Feedback Incorporating ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Multi-Lateral Teleoperation Based on Multi-Agent Framework: Application to ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Model-Augmented Haptic Telemanipulation: Concept, Retrospective Overview, and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Surgical Robot Teleoperation Framework for Providing Haptic Feedback Incorporating ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Teleoperation systems comprise master device (operated by human), slave device (interacts with remote environment), and communication channel connecting them
• Master device incorporates input sensors capturing operator movements and force feedback actuators providing haptic feedback
• Slave device integrates actuators for movement and sensors measuring position, force, and environmental data
• Communication channels transmit control signals from master to slave and feedback signals from slave to master
• Time delay in signal transmission critically affects system stability and performance

Control Loops and Feedback Mechanisms

• Control loops include local control at both master and slave sides, as well as overall bilateral control between the two
• Teleoperation interfaces often combine visual and auditory feedback with haptic information enhancing operator situational awareness
• Haptic feedback mechanisms simulate touch sensations (pressure, texture, vibration) to operator
• Visual feedback typically involves real-time video streaming or 3D virtual representations of remote environment
• Auditory feedback conveys important acoustic information from slave environment (machinery sounds, alarms)

System Architecture Considerations

• Scalability allows teleoperation systems to adapt to different workspace sizes and force requirements
• Modularity enables easy replacement or upgrade of individual components without overhauling entire system
• Redundancy in critical components enhances system reliability and fault tolerance
• Network architecture choices (peer-to-peer, client-server) impact system latency and scalability
• Security measures protect against unauthorized access and ensure data integrity in teleoperation systems

Control Architectures in Teleoperation

Position-Based Control

• Position-position control matches slave device position to master device position, with force feedback derived from position error
• Position-force control uses position commands from master to control slave, while force sensors on slave provide direct force feedback to operator
• Position-force-position control combines aspects of both architectures for improved performance
• Advantages of position-based control include intuitive operation and stability in free-motion tasks
• Challenges arise in accurately reflecting environmental forces and handling rigid contacts

Force-Based Control

• Force-force control (force-reflection) measures forces at both master and slave sides, aiming to equalize them
• Force-position control uses force input at master to generate position commands for slave
• Force-based control provides high-fidelity force transmission enhancing operator's perception of remote environment
• Limitations include potential instability in free-motion tasks and sensitivity to sensor noise
• Force scaling techniques adjust force magnitudes between master and slave for different applications (microsurgery, heavy machinery)

Impedance and Admittance Control

• Impedance control modulates apparent mechanical impedance of master or slave device improving system stability and transparency
• Admittance control, dual of impedance control, uses force inputs to generate position or velocity outputs
• Virtual coupling introduces simulated spring-damper system between master and slave enhancing stability
• These approaches allow for adjustable dynamic behavior adapting to different task requirements
• Implementation requires accurate system modeling and can be computationally intensive

Control Schemes: Advantages vs Limitations

Stability and Performance Trade-offs

• Position-position control offers simplicity and stability but struggles with accurate force reflection and environmental interaction
• Position-force control provides more accurate force feedback but can be less stable, especially with time delays
• Force-force control enables high-fidelity force transmission but may be sensitive to noise and instability in free-motion tasks
• Transparency (faithful transmission of environmental properties) often trades off with stability in control design
• Hybrid schemes aim to balance stability and performance by combining multiple control approaches

Time Delay Compensation

• Time delay compensation techniques (wave variables, passivity-based control) maintain stability in long-distance teleoperation
• Predictive control methods (Smith predictors) mitigate effects of time delay by anticipating system behavior
• Adaptive time delay compensation adjusts control parameters based on varying network conditions
• Challenges increase with longer delays, requiring more sophisticated compensation strategies
• Stability guarantees become more difficult to establish as delay increases

Environmental Interactions and Non-idealities

• Presence of friction, backlash, and sensor noise affects performance of different control schemes to varying degrees
• Impedance control allows for adjustable dynamic behavior but requires accurate system modeling
• Adaptive control techniques handle varying environmental conditions and system parameters
• Virtual fixtures provide guidance and constraint in teleoperation tasks improving precision and safety
• Handling of transitions between free motion and contact with environment remains a significant challenge

Implementing Teleoperation Control Algorithms

Basic Control Techniques

• PD (Proportional-Derivative) control commonly used for simplicity and effectiveness in position tracking
• Force scaling and position scaling match different workspace sizes and force capabilities
• Virtual coupling algorithms enhance stability by introducing virtual spring-damper system between devices
• PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) control improves steady-state error and disturbance rejection
• Feedforward control compensates for known system dynamics improving tracking performance

Advanced Control Strategies

• Adaptive control techniques handle varying environmental conditions and system parameters
• Robust control methods ensure stability and performance in presence of uncertainties and disturbances
• Model Predictive Control (MPC) optimizes system behavior over a future time horizon
• Sliding mode control provides robustness against parameter variations and external disturbances
• Fuzzy logic control incorporates human-like reasoning for complex teleoperation scenarios

State Estimation and Safety Features

• Kalman filters and other state estimation algorithms handle sensor noise and improve tracking performance
• Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) address nonlinear system dynamics
• Particle filters provide robust state estimation for highly nonlinear or non-Gaussian systems
• Safety features (virtual fixtures, force thresholds) prevent damage and ensure operator safety
• Collision detection algorithms prevent unintended contact between slave device and environment