7.2 Accountability and Performance Measurement

Accountability and performance measurement are crucial aspects of education policy, aiming to improve student outcomes. These tools help track progress, identify areas for improvement, and hold schools responsible for results. However, they can also lead to unintended consequences.

Standardized tests and value-added models are common measurement tools, but they have limitations. Other indicators like graduation rates and school climate surveys provide a more comprehensive picture. The impact of these policies on student achievement and equity is mixed, with both positive and negative effects observed.

Accountability in Education Policy

Purpose and Mechanisms

Top images from around the web for Purpose and Mechanisms

• 

  Side effects and the enactment of accountability: results of a comparative study in two German ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Accountability in education: Meeting our commitments | COMOSAConnect - Share your Open Schooling ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Accountability - Praxis Framework View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Side effects and the enactment of accountability: results of a comparative study in two German ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Accountability in education: Meeting our commitments | COMOSAConnect - Share your Open Schooling ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Purpose and Mechanisms

• 

  Side effects and the enactment of accountability: results of a comparative study in two German ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Accountability in education: Meeting our commitments | COMOSAConnect - Share your Open Schooling ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Accountability - Praxis Framework View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Side effects and the enactment of accountability: results of a comparative study in two German ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Accountability in education: Meeting our commitments | COMOSAConnect - Share your Open Schooling ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Accountability in education policy aims to hold schools, districts, and states responsible for student outcomes and incentivize improvement through rewards and sanctions
• Accountability mechanisms often include standardized testing, public reporting of results, and consequences tied to performance targets
• The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) are key federal laws that have shaped accountability policies in the U.S.
• State and local education agencies also implement their own accountability systems, which may include additional measures beyond federal requirements

Goals and Intentions

• Accountability policies are intended to promote transparency, identify areas for improvement, and ensure that all students receive a quality education
• They seek to close achievement gaps and raise overall student performance by setting clear expectations and holding educators accountable for results
• Accountability systems aim to provide parents and the public with information about school quality and empower them to make informed choices
• By tying consequences to performance, accountability policies create incentives for schools to focus on improving student outcomes and addressing areas of weakness

Performance Measurement Tools

Standardized Tests and Value-Added Models

• Standardized tests are commonly used to measure student achievement and growth, but they have limitations such as narrow scope, potential bias, and teaching to the test
  • Examples of standardized tests include state assessments (STAAR in Texas), national assessments (NAEP), and college admissions tests (SAT, ACT)
• Value-added models (VAMs) attempt to isolate the impact of teachers or schools on student learning, but they are complex, often unstable, and can be influenced by factors outside of educators' control
  • VAMs use statistical techniques to estimate the contribution of individual teachers or schools to student growth, controlling for prior achievement and student characteristics
  • They are controversial due to concerns about validity, reliability, and fairness in high-stakes evaluation decisions

Other Performance Indicators

• Graduation rates and college enrollment are important long-term indicators, but they may not fully capture the quality of education or post-secondary readiness
  • Graduation rates can be inflated through credit recovery programs or lowered standards, and college enrollment does not necessarily reflect success in higher education
• School climate surveys and other non-academic measures can provide valuable information about learning environments and student well-being, but they are subjective and harder to compare across contexts
  • Examples include student and teacher surveys of engagement, safety, and relationships, as well as measures of attendance, discipline, and social-emotional learning
• Multiple measures should be used in combination to provide a more comprehensive picture of school performance and student outcomes
  • A balanced accountability system might include a mix of academic indicators (test scores, growth, graduation rates), non-academic indicators (climate, attendance), and measures of equity and access (course enrollment, funding)

Impact of Accountability Policies

Effects on Student Achievement

• Research on the effects of accountability policies on student achievement has yielded mixed results, with some studies finding modest gains and others showing little or no impact
  • A meta-analysis by Lee (2008) found small positive effects of accountability on math and reading scores, but noted substantial variation across states and subgroups
  • Hanushek and Raymond (2005) found that states with stronger accountability systems had larger gains in NAEP scores, but the effects were not consistent across all states or subjects
• High-stakes testing can lead to a narrowing of the curriculum and a focus on test preparation at the expense of deeper learning and non-tested subjects
  • Schools may reduce time for subjects like science, social studies, art, and music in order to focus on tested subjects (math and reading)
  • Teachers may feel pressure to "teach to the test" by drilling students on specific skills and question types rather than promoting conceptual understanding and critical thinking

Equity Concerns

• Accountability pressures may exacerbate existing inequities by disproportionately affecting low-income and minority students and schools with fewer resources
  • Schools serving disadvantaged populations often face greater challenges in meeting performance targets and may be more likely to face sanctions or closure
  • High-stakes accountability can create incentives to push out low-performing students or limit their access to advanced courses and enrichment opportunities
• Some evidence suggests that accountability policies have led to increased segregation and stratification as families seek to avoid low-performing schools
  • Affluent families may be more likely to exercise school choice options or move to higher-performing districts, leaving behind concentrations of poverty and need
• Accountability systems that rely heavily on proficiency rates may create incentives to focus on "bubble" students near the cut score rather than supporting growth for all students
  • Schools may allocate more resources and attention to students who are close to passing, neglecting the needs of both high-achieving and struggling learners

Unintended Consequences of Accountability

Gaming Behaviors and Perverse Incentives

• High-stakes accountability can create perverse incentives for schools to engage in gaming behaviors such as excluding low-performing students from testing or manipulating data
  • Schools may encourage absences or suspensions on test days, reclassify students into special education or limited English proficiency categories, or create alternative programs to remove them from the testing pool
  • Administrators may feel pressure to cheat or alter answer sheets, as in the Atlanta Public Schools cheating scandal uncovered in 2011
• Attaching high stakes to test scores may lead to increased stress and anxiety for students and teachers, with negative impacts on motivation and well-being
  • Students may experience test anxiety, reduced self-esteem, and a lack of enjoyment in learning when faced with constant pressure to perform
  • Teachers may feel demoralized and disempowered by the emphasis on test scores and the lack of autonomy in their classrooms

Challenges for School Improvement

• Accountability policies that rely on sanctions and closure of low-performing schools can disrupt communities and limit options for students, particularly in disadvantaged areas
  • School closures can lead to increased travel times, overcrowding in receiving schools, and loss of neighborhood institutions
  • Turnaround strategies that involve firing staff or converting schools to charters have had mixed results and may not address underlying issues of poverty and segregation
• Overemphasis on accountability measures may undermine teacher autonomy and professionalism, leading to decreased job satisfaction and retention
  • Teachers may feel constrained by scripted curricula and pacing guides aligned to test content, leaving little room for creativity and responsiveness to student needs
  • High-stakes evaluation systems based on student test scores can create a culture of fear and competition among teachers, eroding collaboration and collegiality
• Accountability systems that are overly punitive or fail to provide adequate support for improvement may be counterproductive and exacerbate existing challenges in struggling schools
  • Sanctions and labels of failure can demoralize staff and students, making it harder to attract and retain high-quality educators
  • Schools need resources, capacity-building, and technical assistance to identify and address areas for improvement, not just threats of consequences