7.1 Begging the Question and Circular Reasoning

Fallacies of presumption can trip up even the smartest thinkers. Begging the question and circular reasoning are sneaky ways arguments can go wrong. They assume what they're trying to prove, leaving you running in circles.

These fallacies pop up everywhere, from casual chats to political debates. Spotting them helps you think more clearly and argue more effectively. Let's break down how they work and why they're so tricky to catch.

Definition and Terminology

Understanding Begging the Question and Circular Reasoning

Top images from around the web for Understanding Begging the Question and Circular Reasoning

• 

  Circular reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Critical Thinking Skills | College Success View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical Fallacies - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Circular reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Critical Thinking Skills | College Success View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Understanding Begging the Question and Circular Reasoning

• 

  Circular reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Critical Thinking Skills | College Success View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical Fallacies - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Circular reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Critical Thinking Skills | College Success View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Begging the question refers to an argument where the conclusion assumes the truth of the premise without providing independent evidence
• Circular reasoning involves an argument that uses its own conclusion as one of its premises
• Petitio principii serves as the Latin term for begging the question, translating to "assuming the initial point"
• Logical fallacy encompasses flawed reasoning patterns that render arguments invalid or unsound
  • Begging the question falls under the category of informal logical fallacies
  • Informal fallacies relate to the content of the argument rather than its structure

Distinguishing Characteristics and Examples

• Begging the question often appears convincing at first glance but lacks substantive support
  • "The Bible is true because it says so in the Bible"
• Circular reasoning creates a closed loop of logic that fails to provide new information
  • "Smoking is bad for you because it's unhealthy"
• Tautologies involve statements that are true by definition but offer no meaningful insight
  • "All bachelors are unmarried men"
• Identifying these fallacies requires careful analysis of the argument's structure and premises

Structure of the Fallacy

Components of Circular Arguments

• Premise functions as the starting point or assumption in an argument
  • In circular reasoning, the premise often restates the conclusion in different words
• Conclusion represents the claim being argued for or the point being proven
  • Circular arguments fail to provide independent support for the conclusion
• Tautology occurs when a statement is true by virtue of its logical form
  • "Either it will rain tomorrow or it won't rain tomorrow"
  • Tautologies differ from circular reasoning as they are always true, while circular arguments can be false

Analyzing Circular Reasoning Patterns

• Circular arguments often follow a structure where A implies B, and B implies A
  • "The President is trustworthy because the White House says so, and the White House is reliable because the President appointed them"
• Identifying hidden assumptions helps reveal the circular nature of an argument
  • "Free will exists because we make choices, and we make choices because we have free will"
• Breaking down complex arguments into simpler components can expose circular logic
  • Examine each premise and conclusion separately to determine if they rely on each other