7.5 Cognitive walkthroughs

Cognitive walkthroughs are a key usability inspection method. They analyze how users navigate interfaces, focusing on learnability for new users. This approach helps identify potential issues early in the design process, ensuring interfaces are intuitive and user-friendly.

The process involves selecting tasks, identifying user goals, and examining each step from a novice perspective. By emphasizing ease of learning, cognitive walkthroughs complement other usability methods, offering valuable insights into user decision-making and potential barriers to adoption.

Definition of cognitive walkthroughs

• Cognitive walkthroughs are a usability inspection method used to evaluate the ease of learning and use of a user interface
• Involve a step-by-step analysis of a user's cognitive processes while completing specific tasks within a system
• Focus on understanding how users navigate through an interface and identify potential usability issues, particularly for new or novice users

Goals of cognitive walkthroughs

• Assess the learnability and intuitiveness of a user interface, especially for first-time users
• Identify usability problems that may hinder users from achieving their goals or understanding how to interact with the system
• Provide insights into the cognitive processes and decision-making of users as they navigate through an interface
• Suggest improvements to enhance the user experience and minimize cognitive load during task completion

Steps in cognitive walkthrough process

Selection of tasks for evaluation

Top images from around the web for Selection of tasks for evaluation

• 

  The Planning Cycle | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  User Experience diagram | The information architect Peter Mo… | Flickr - Photo Sharing! View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:User-experience-diagram.png - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Planning Cycle | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  User Experience diagram | The information architect Peter Mo… | Flickr - Photo Sharing! View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Selection of tasks for evaluation

• 

  The Planning Cycle | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  User Experience diagram | The information architect Peter Mo… | Flickr - Photo Sharing! View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:User-experience-diagram.png - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Planning Cycle | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  User Experience diagram | The information architect Peter Mo… | Flickr - Photo Sharing! View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Choose representative tasks that cover the primary functionalities and user goals of the system
• Tasks should be specific, realistic, and relevant to the target user group
• Consider tasks that are critical to the success of the system and may pose potential usability challenges

Identification of user goals

• Define the goals users aim to achieve by completing each selected task
• Break down the goals into smaller sub-goals or steps required to accomplish the overall task
• Ensure that the goals align with the users' expectations and the system's intended purpose

Documentation of correct sequence

• Outline the correct sequence of actions or steps required to successfully complete each task
• Document the expected user interactions, system responses, and any necessary feedback or guidance
• Create a detailed, step-by-step walkthrough of the ideal user flow for each task

Examination of learnability

• Evaluate each step in the task sequence from the perspective of a new or novice user
• Assess whether the interface provides sufficient cues, feedback, and guidance to support user understanding and decision-making
• Identify potential barriers to learning, such as unclear labels, hidden functionalities, or inconsistent design patterns
• Consider the cognitive load required at each step and whether it aligns with users' expectations and mental models

Advantages of cognitive walkthroughs

Early identification of usability issues

• Cognitive walkthroughs can be conducted early in the design process, even with low-fidelity prototypes or wireframes
• Identifying usability problems early allows for timely corrections and improvements before significant resources are invested in development
• Early detection of issues helps prevent costly redesigns and reduces the risk of user frustration and abandonment

Focus on new users' perspectives

• Cognitive walkthroughs prioritize the experience of new or novice users, who may face the greatest challenges in learning and using a system
• By evaluating the interface from the perspective of new users, designers can ensure that the system is intuitive and easy to learn
• This focus helps identify potential barriers to adoption and reduces the learning curve for new users

Emphasis on ease of learning

• Cognitive walkthroughs specifically assess the learnability of an interface, which is critical for user acceptance and satisfaction
• By examining the cognitive processes and decision-making at each step, designers can identify areas where users may struggle to understand or navigate the system
• Improving the ease of learning enhances the overall user experience and increases the likelihood of successful user adoption

Limitations of cognitive walkthroughs

Lack of consideration for efficiency

• Cognitive walkthroughs primarily focus on the learnability and ease of use for new users
• They may not adequately address the efficiency or performance of the interface for experienced users who have already learned the system
• Efficiency considerations, such as the number of steps required or the time taken to complete tasks, may be overlooked in cognitive walkthroughs

Dependence on evaluators' expertise

• The effectiveness of cognitive walkthroughs relies heavily on the expertise and judgment of the evaluators conducting the analysis
• Evaluators need to have a deep understanding of user behavior, cognitive processes, and usability principles to accurately identify potential issues
• The results of cognitive walkthroughs may vary based on the evaluators' skills, biases, and domain knowledge

Potential for overlooking user diversity

• Cognitive walkthroughs often assume a generic user profile and may not account for the diverse needs, preferences, and abilities of different user groups
• The evaluation may not consider factors such as accessibility, cultural differences, or varying levels of technical expertise among users
• Overlooking user diversity can lead to designs that do not accommodate the full range of user requirements and may exclude certain user segments

Cognitive walkthrough vs heuristic evaluation

Differences in focus and approach

• Cognitive walkthroughs focus specifically on the learnability and ease of use for new users, while heuristic evaluations assess a broader range of usability principles
• Cognitive walkthroughs involve a detailed, step-by-step analysis of user tasks, whereas heuristic evaluations rely on a set of predefined usability guidelines or heuristics
• Cognitive walkthroughs emphasize the cognitive processes and decision-making of users, while heuristic evaluations consider various aspects of the interface design and interaction

Complementary nature of techniques

• Cognitive walkthroughs and heuristic evaluations can be used together to provide a comprehensive usability assessment
• Cognitive walkthroughs offer insights into the learnability and user experience for new users, while heuristic evaluations identify a wider range of usability issues
• Combining both techniques helps ensure that the interface is both easy to learn and adheres to established usability principles

Conducting effective cognitive walkthroughs

Preparation and task selection

• Define clear goals and objectives for the cognitive walkthrough, aligned with the overall usability goals of the system
• Select representative tasks that cover the primary user flows and functionalities of the interface
• Ensure that the chosen tasks are realistic, specific, and relevant to the target user group
• Prepare any necessary materials, such as prototypes, wireframes, or task scenarios, to facilitate the evaluation process

Facilitating the evaluation process

• Assemble a diverse team of evaluators with expertise in user experience, cognitive psychology, and the relevant domain
• Provide evaluators with clear instructions, guidelines, and evaluation criteria to ensure consistency and thoroughness
• Encourage evaluators to think aloud and verbalize their thought processes as they walk through each task step
• Foster an open and collaborative environment where evaluators can discuss their findings, insights, and recommendations

Analyzing and reporting findings

• Compile and consolidate the findings from the cognitive walkthrough sessions
• Identify common usability issues, patterns, and areas for improvement across the evaluated tasks
• Prioritize the identified issues based on their impact on user experience and the overall goals of the system
• Provide clear and actionable recommendations for addressing the identified usability problems
• Document the findings and recommendations in a structured report, including specific examples and supporting evidence

Integrating cognitive walkthroughs in design

Timing and frequency of evaluations

• Conduct cognitive walkthroughs at various stages of the design process, from early conceptual phases to final iterations
• Perform initial evaluations with low-fidelity prototypes or wireframes to identify fundamental usability issues early on
• Repeat cognitive walkthroughs as the design evolves to ensure that usability improvements are effectively implemented
• Consider conducting cognitive walkthroughs before major design decisions or milestones to inform the direction of the project

Incorporating findings into iterations

• Treat the findings from cognitive walkthroughs as valuable input for design iterations and refinements
• Prioritize and address the identified usability issues based on their severity and impact on user experience
• Collaborate with the design team to develop solutions and alternative approaches that enhance learnability and ease of use
• Validate the effectiveness of the implemented changes through subsequent cognitive walkthroughs or user testing

Balancing with other usability methods

• Recognize that cognitive walkthroughs are one of many usability evaluation methods available
• Combine cognitive walkthroughs with other techniques, such as heuristic evaluations, user testing, or contextual inquiries, to gain a comprehensive understanding of usability
• Use the insights from cognitive walkthroughs to inform the focus and design of other usability studies
• Regularly assess the effectiveness and return on investment of cognitive walkthroughs in relation to other usability methods used in the project