7.2 Development Strategies and Their Outcomes

Countries have tried various strategies to boost economic growth and development. Import Substitution Industrialization aims to reduce reliance on imports, while Export-Oriented Industrialization focuses on producing goods for global markets. Neoliberal policies advocate for free-market principles and minimal state intervention.

These approaches have had mixed results. ISI can create local jobs but may lead to inefficient resource allocation. EOI can drive rapid growth but increases vulnerability to global shocks. Neoliberal policies can attract foreign investment but may widen income inequality. International institutions and the state-versus-market debate also play crucial roles in shaping development outcomes.

Development Strategies

Development strategies comparison

Top images from around the web for Development strategies comparison

• 

  Ansoff matrix - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategic Opportunity Matrix | Principles of Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Global Business Strategies for Responding to Cultural Differences | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ansoff matrix - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategic Opportunity Matrix | Principles of Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Development strategies comparison

• 

  Ansoff matrix - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategic Opportunity Matrix | Principles of Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Global Business Strategies for Responding to Cultural Differences | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ansoff matrix - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategic Opportunity Matrix | Principles of Marketing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI)
  • Focuses on developing domestic industries to reduce reliance on imported goods by imposing high tariffs and quotas (automobiles, electronics)
  • Encourages local production of previously imported goods to promote self-sufficiency and create local jobs
  • Can lead to inefficient allocation of resources due to lack of competition and limited economies of scale
• Export-Oriented Industrialization (EOI)
  • Emphasizes the production of goods for export to global markets by leveraging comparative advantage and specialization (textiles, electronics)
  • Relies on attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) to boost export sectors and increase foreign exchange earnings
  • Can result in rapid economic growth but may lead to vulnerability to global economic shocks and fluctuations in demand
• Neoliberal Policies
  • Advocate for free-market principles and minimal state intervention through trade liberalization, deregulation, and privatization
  • Emphasize the role of the private sector in driving economic growth and improving efficiency and competitiveness
  • Can increase foreign investment and access to global markets but may exacerbate income inequality and reduce the role of the state in providing social services

Outcomes of development approaches

• Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI)
  • Successes:
    • Develops domestic industries and reduces reliance on imports, creating local jobs and increasing self-sufficiency (Brazil's automotive industry)
  • Failures:
    • Leads to inefficient allocation of resources due to lack of competition and high costs of production
    • Difficulty in transitioning to export-oriented growth due to limited economies of scale and competitiveness
• Export-Oriented Industrialization (EOI)
  • Successes:
    • Drives rapid economic growth through export sectors, increasing foreign exchange earnings and improving balance of payments (South Korea's electronics industry)
    • Creates jobs and reduces poverty in export-oriented industries, particularly in labor-intensive sectors
  • Failures:
    • Increases vulnerability to global economic shocks and fluctuations in demand, as seen during the Asian Financial Crisis
    • Can lead to exploitative labor practices and environmental degradation in pursuit of competitiveness
    • May result in uneven distribution of benefits and widening income inequality within countries
• Neoliberal Policies
  • Successes:
    • Increases foreign investment and access to global markets, promoting efficiency and competitiveness (Chile's economic reforms)
    • Can lead to higher economic growth rates through market-driven resource allocation
  • Failures:
    • Exacerbates income inequality and social disparities, as benefits may not trickle down to the poor
    • Reduces the role of the state in providing social services and safety nets, leaving vulnerable populations exposed
    • Increases vulnerability to financial crises and capital flight due to deregulation and liberalization

Role of International Financial Institutions and the State

International institutions in development

• World Bank
  • Provides loans and grants for development projects and poverty reduction, such as infrastructure and social sector investments
  • Offers technical assistance and policy advice to developing countries, influencing their development strategies
  • Influences development strategies through conditionality attached to lending, often promoting neoliberal policies
• International Monetary Fund (IMF)
  • Provides short-term loans to countries facing balance of payments crises, helping to restore macroeconomic stability
  • Promotes macroeconomic stability and financial sector reforms through policy recommendations and surveillance
  • Influences development strategies through structural adjustment programs, which often involve austerity measures and market-oriented reforms
• Criticisms of International Financial Institutions
  • Imposes neoliberal policies and Washington Consensus, which may not be suitable for all countries
  • Limited consideration of country-specific contexts and development priorities, leading to one-size-fits-all approaches
  • Can exacerbate debt burdens and economic vulnerabilities, particularly in countries with limited bargaining power

State vs market in economic development

• Arguments for State Intervention
  1. Addresses market failures and provides public goods, such as infrastructure and education
  2. Promotes strategic industries and infant industry protection to foster domestic capabilities (South Korea's heavy industries)
  3. Ensures social welfare and redistributive policies to reduce inequality and promote inclusive growth
• Arguments for Market-Led Approaches
  1. Enables efficient allocation of resources through market mechanisms, leading to higher productivity and competitiveness
  2. Encourages private sector investment and entrepreneurship, driving innovation and job creation
  3. Reduces rent-seeking behavior and government inefficiencies, which can hinder economic growth
• Balancing State and Market
  • Recognizes the complementary roles of the state and the market in promoting economic development
  • Adapts development strategies to country-specific contexts and capacities, considering institutional strengths and weaknesses
  • Promotes effective institutions and governance frameworks to ensure accountability, transparency, and rule of law