7.3 Document analysis

Document analysis is a powerful research method in political science. It allows researchers to examine written records to uncover insights about political events, institutions, and behaviors. This approach offers unique advantages like unobtrusive data collection and the ability to track changes over time.

Researchers can analyze various types of documents, from primary sources like letters to secondary sources like scholarly articles. While document analysis has limitations, such as selective survival of records, it remains a valuable tool for understanding political phenomena and their historical contexts.

Types of documents

• Documents are written, printed, or electronic records that contain information and serve as evidence or proof
• Types of documents can be categorized based on their origin, purpose, and intended audience
• Understanding the different types of documents is crucial for selecting appropriate sources for research and analysis

Primary vs secondary sources

Top images from around the web for Primary vs secondary sources

• 

  Finding Sources | Basic Reading and Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ask the clinical question - types of evidence and PICO - Evidence based practice (EBP) - Library ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Why Is Research Important? | Guide to Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Finding Sources | Basic Reading and Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ask the clinical question - types of evidence and PICO - Evidence based practice (EBP) - Library ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Primary vs secondary sources

• 

  Finding Sources | Basic Reading and Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ask the clinical question - types of evidence and PICO - Evidence based practice (EBP) - Library ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Why Is Research Important? | Guide to Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Finding Sources | Basic Reading and Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ask the clinical question - types of evidence and PICO - Evidence based practice (EBP) - Library ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Primary sources are original documents created by individuals directly involved in an event or experience (letters, diaries, eyewitness accounts)
• Secondary sources are documents that interpret, analyze, or summarize information from primary sources (scholarly articles, history books)
• Primary sources provide firsthand evidence, while secondary sources offer context and interpretation
• Researchers often prioritize primary sources for their authenticity and immediacy, but secondary sources can provide valuable insights and perspectives

Public vs private documents

• Public documents are created by government agencies, organizations, or institutions and are typically accessible to the general public (laws, court records, census data)
• Private documents are created by individuals or private entities and may have restricted access (personal correspondence, business records)
• Public documents are often used for research on social, political, and economic issues, while private documents can provide insights into personal experiences and perspectives
• Researchers must consider issues of privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual property when accessing and using private documents

Advantages of document analysis

• Document analysis offers several advantages as a research method in political science and other social science disciplines
• These advantages include the ability to collect data unobtrusively, gain historical context, and track change over time

Unobtrusive data collection

• Document analysis allows researchers to gather data without directly interacting with participants or influencing their behavior
• Unobtrusive data collection minimizes the risk of researcher bias or reactivity, where participants change their behavior in response to being studied
• Documents can provide a rich source of data on sensitive or controversial topics that participants may be reluctant to discuss in interviews or surveys

Historical context

• Documents can provide valuable insights into the historical context of political events, movements, and institutions
• Historical documents, such as speeches, manifestos, and policy papers, can shed light on the motivations, strategies, and ideologies of political actors
• Analyzing documents from different time periods can help researchers understand how political ideas and practices have evolved over time

Tracking change over time

• Document analysis enables researchers to track changes in political discourse, policies, and institutions over time
• By analyzing a series of documents from different points in time, researchers can identify patterns, trends, and shifts in political priorities and strategies
• Tracking change over time can help researchers test theories about political change and identify the factors that drive or constrain political developments

Disadvantages of document analysis

• While document analysis offers several advantages, it also has some limitations and challenges that researchers must consider
• These disadvantages include the selective survival of documents, incomplete or inaccurate records, and lack of standardization

Selective survival of documents

• Not all documents survive over time, and those that do may not be representative of the full range of documents produced in a given period
• Documents may be lost, destroyed, or selectively preserved based on their perceived importance or the interests of those who control them
• The selective survival of documents can introduce bias into research findings and limit the generalizability of conclusions

Incomplete or inaccurate records

• Documents may contain incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information, either intentionally or unintentionally
• Official records may be manipulated or censored to serve political interests, while personal documents may reflect individual biases or misperceptions
• Researchers must critically evaluate the reliability and validity of documents and seek to corroborate findings with other sources

Lack of standardization

• Documents may vary widely in their format, content, and quality, making it difficult to compare and synthesize findings across different sources
• Lack of standardization can make it challenging to apply consistent coding schemes or analytical frameworks to diverse documents
• Researchers may need to develop flexible and adaptive approaches to document analysis that can accommodate variations in document types and characteristics

Approaches to document analysis

• There are several approaches to document analysis that researchers can use depending on their research questions, theoretical frameworks, and methodological preferences
• These approaches include content analysis, discourse analysis, and interpretive analysis

Content analysis

• Content analysis involves systematically coding and quantifying the content of documents based on predefined categories or themes
• Researchers develop a coding scheme that specifies the variables of interest and the criteria for assigning codes to document segments
• Content analysis can be used to identify patterns, trends, and relationships in document content and to test hypotheses about the prevalence or significance of certain themes

Discourse analysis

• Discourse analysis focuses on the ways in which language is used to construct social and political realities in documents
• Researchers examine the linguistic features, rhetorical strategies, and ideological assumptions embedded in documents to understand how they shape meanings and identities
• Discourse analysis can be used to explore the power dynamics, social norms, and cultural values that underlie political communication and action

Interpretive analysis

• Interpretive analysis involves a close reading of documents to uncover their deeper meanings, contexts, and implications
• Researchers immerse themselves in the documents and use their own knowledge, intuition, and analytical skills to make sense of the data
• Interpretive analysis can be used to generate rich, nuanced insights into the subjective experiences, motivations, and worldviews of political actors and to situate documents within broader historical and cultural contexts

Steps in document analysis

• Document analysis involves a systematic process of selecting, reviewing, and interpreting documents to answer research questions and generate insights
• The steps in document analysis include developing research questions, identifying relevant documents, assessing document authenticity, analyzing document content, and synthesizing findings

Developing research questions

• Researchers begin by formulating clear, focused research questions that guide the selection and analysis of documents
• Research questions should be grounded in existing literature and theory and should be feasible to answer through document analysis
• Examples of research questions include: How have political parties' campaign strategies changed over time? What are the dominant frames used in media coverage of a particular policy issue?

Identifying relevant documents

• Researchers identify documents that are relevant to their research questions and that meet their inclusion criteria
• Relevant documents may be located through searches of archives, databases, or online sources, or through referrals from experts or participants
• Researchers should strive for a comprehensive and representative sample of documents that captures the diversity of perspectives and experiences related to their topic

Assessing document authenticity

• Researchers assess the authenticity and credibility of documents by examining their provenance, authorship, and context
• Authentic documents are those that are genuine, reliable, and free from tampering or manipulation
• Researchers may use techniques such as triangulation, expert review, or forensic analysis to verify the authenticity of documents

Analyzing document content

• Researchers analyze the content of documents using their chosen approach, such as content analysis, discourse analysis, or interpretive analysis
• Analysis involves close reading, coding, and interpretation of document segments to identify patterns, themes, and meanings
• Researchers may use qualitative data analysis software or manual techniques to facilitate the analysis process

Synthesizing findings

• Researchers synthesize their findings by integrating insights from multiple documents and sources to develop a coherent and compelling narrative
• Synthesis involves identifying common themes, contrasts, and contradictions across documents and situating findings within broader theoretical and practical contexts
• Researchers may use techniques such as meta-analysis, narrative synthesis, or concept mapping to integrate and communicate their findings

Sampling strategies for documents

• Sampling is the process of selecting a subset of documents from a larger population for analysis
• Sampling strategies for documents include purposive sampling, snowball sampling, and theoretical sampling

Purposive sampling

• Purposive sampling involves selecting documents based on specific criteria or characteristics that are relevant to the research questions
• Researchers use their judgment and expertise to identify documents that are information-rich and that represent the diversity of perspectives and experiences related to their topic
• Examples of purposive sampling criteria include document type, author, time period, or content

Snowball sampling

• Snowball sampling involves identifying additional documents through referrals or citations from initial documents or informants
• Researchers ask participants or experts to recommend other documents or sources that are relevant to their research questions
• Snowball sampling can be useful for identifying hard-to-find or specialized documents and for tracing networks of influence or communication

Theoretical sampling

• Theoretical sampling involves selecting documents based on their relevance to emerging theoretical concepts or categories
• Researchers use an iterative process of data collection and analysis to refine their theoretical framework and to seek out documents that can fill conceptual gaps or challenge existing assumptions
• Theoretical sampling can be useful for developing grounded theory or for exploring the boundaries and variations of a phenomenon

Ethical considerations in document analysis

• Document analysis raises ethical issues related to privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual property that researchers must navigate carefully
• Ethical considerations in document analysis include copyright and intellectual property, confidentiality and privacy, and researcher bias and interpretation

Copyright and intellectual property

• Researchers must respect the intellectual property rights of document creators and owners and obtain necessary permissions for use
• Copyright laws and fair use guidelines vary by country and institution, and researchers should consult with legal experts or librarians to ensure compliance
• Researchers should provide proper attribution and credit to document sources and should not misrepresent or plagiarize others' work

Confidentiality and privacy

• Researchers must protect the confidentiality and privacy of individuals and organizations mentioned in documents, especially those that contain sensitive or identifying information
• Researchers should obtain informed consent from participants when possible and should use pseudonyms or other measures to anonymize data when necessary
• Researchers should be transparent about their data collection and storage practices and should follow institutional and disciplinary guidelines for data management and sharing

Researcher bias and interpretation

• Researchers must be reflexive about their own biases, assumptions, and interpretations when analyzing documents and should strive for transparency and credibility in their findings
• Researchers should use multiple sources and methods to triangulate findings and should seek feedback from peers, experts, or participants to validate their interpretations
• Researchers should be humble about the limitations and uncertainties of their findings and should acknowledge alternative explanations or perspectives

Technological tools for document analysis

• Technological tools can facilitate and enhance the process of document analysis by automating tasks, managing data, and generating insights
• Technological tools for document analysis include optical character recognition (OCR), qualitative data analysis software, and text mining and natural language processing

Optical character recognition (OCR)

• OCR is a technology that converts scanned or photographed images of text into machine-readable and searchable text
• OCR can be used to digitize large volumes of printed or handwritten documents and to enable full-text search and analysis
• Examples of OCR software include ABBYY FineReader, Adobe Acrobat, and Google Cloud Vision API

Qualitative data analysis software

• Qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) is designed to support the coding, organization, and analysis of unstructured or semi-structured data, such as text, images, and audio/video
• QDAS can be used to create and apply coding schemes, to visualize patterns and relationships in data, and to generate reports and outputs
• Examples of QDAS include NVivo, ATLAS.ti, and MAXQDA

Text mining and natural language processing

• Text mining and natural language processing (NLP) are techniques for extracting meaningful information and insights from large volumes of unstructured text data
• Text mining and NLP can be used to identify topics, sentiments, and entities in documents, to analyze linguistic patterns and structures, and to generate summaries and visualizations
• Examples of text mining and NLP tools include Python libraries (NLTK, spaCy), R packages (tm, quanteda), and cloud-based services (AWS Comprehend, Google Cloud Natural Language)