7.4 Estates and future interests

Estates and future interests are crucial concepts in property law, shaping how ownership rights are defined and transferred. These legal constructs determine the extent of control an owner has over property and how that control may change over time.

Understanding estates and future interests is essential for grasping the complexities of property ownership. From fee simple estates to life estates, and from reversions to executory interests, these concepts form the foundation for how property rights are allocated and managed in the legal system.

Types of estates

• Estates in land refer to the degree, nature, and extent of an owner's interest in real property
• The type of estate determines the rights, duties, and limitations of the property owner
• Common law recognizes several types of estates, each with distinct characteristics and durations

Fee simple estates

Top images from around the web for Fee simple estates

• 

  Reading: Sole Proprietorship and Partnerships | Introduction to Business View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Estate in land - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Write A Will in Naperville | Murzyn Law | Naperville, IL View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: Sole Proprietorship and Partnerships | Introduction to Business View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Estate in land - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Fee simple estates

• 

  Reading: Sole Proprietorship and Partnerships | Introduction to Business View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Estate in land - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Write A Will in Naperville | Murzyn Law | Naperville, IL View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: Sole Proprietorship and Partnerships | Introduction to Business View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Estate in land - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Represents the greatest possible ownership interest in real property, providing the owner with complete control and the right to dispose of the property as they see fit
• Has an indefinite duration and can be freely transferred, sold, or inherited by the owner's heirs
• Three main types of fee simple estates: fee simple absolute (no conditions), fee simple determinable (subject to a limiting condition), and fee simple subject to a condition subsequent (can be terminated if a specified event occurs)

Life estates

• Grants the owner (life tenant) the right to possess and use the property for the duration of their life or the life of another specified person (pur autre vie)
• Upon the death of the life tenant or specified person, the property reverts to the original grantor or passes to a designated remainder person
• Life tenant has the right to use and enjoy the property but cannot sell, transfer, or encumber the property beyond their lifetime

Fee tail estates

• Historical estate that restricted inheritance to a specific line of heirs, typically the owner's direct descendants (heirs of the body)
• Designed to keep property within a family for generations, preventing the current owner from selling or transferring the land outside the family line
• Fee tail estates have been abolished or significantly limited in most U.S. states, as they are seen as an unreasonable restraint on alienation and can lead to fragmentation of land ownership

Future interests

• Future interests are property rights that take effect in the future, following the termination of a present possessory estate
• They represent the right to own or possess the property at a later time, based on the occurrence of a specified event or condition
• Future interests can be retained by the grantor or transferred to a third party

Reversions

• A reversion is a future interest retained by the grantor when conveying a lesser estate (e.g., life estate or fee simple determinable)
• It represents the grantor's right to regain possession and control of the property upon the termination of the lesser estate
• Reversions are always vested, meaning they are certain to take effect in the future, as the grantor has not transferred their entire interest in the property

Remainders

• A remainder is a future interest created in a third party (remainderman) that follows a preceding possessory estate, such as a life estate
• Remainders can be vested or contingent, depending on whether the remainderman is ascertained and their right to future possession is certain
• Vested remainders are further classified as indefeasibly vested, vested subject to open, or vested subject to complete divestment

Executory interests

• An executory interest is a future interest, held by a third party, that divests or cuts short another interest, whether vested or contingent
• Executory interests can be created in two ways: (1) following a fee simple determinable (shifting executory interest) or (2) following a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent (springing executory interest)
• Unlike remainders, executory interests do not require a preceding possessory estate and can divest a vested interest

Vested vs contingent interests

• Vested interests are those in which the holder is ascertained, and their right to future possession is certain, not dependent on any condition precedent
• Contingent interests are those in which the holder is unascertained or their right to future possession is subject to a condition precedent that may or may not occur
• The distinction between vested and contingent interests is crucial for determining the alienability, descendibility, and devisability of future interests

Rule against perpetuities

• The rule against perpetuities is a common law doctrine that limits the creation of remote future interests, promoting the alienability and marketability of property
• It ensures that property owners cannot tie up land indefinitely through complex future interest arrangements, which can hinder economic development and efficient use of resources
• The rule applies to contingent remainders, executory interests, and options to purchase real estate, but not to vested interests or reversions

Rationale for the rule

• The rule against perpetuities balances the rights of current property owners to dispose of their land as they see fit with society's interest in ensuring that property remains alienable and productive
• It prevents the creation of overly restrictive or remote future interests that could render land unmarketable or hinder its development for generations
• The rule also simplifies property transactions by limiting the need to track down and obtain consent from multiple potential interest holders

Measuring lives

• Under the rule against perpetuities, a future interest is valid if it is certain to vest, if at all, within 21 years after the death of a "life in being" at the time the interest is created
• A "life in being" (or measuring life) is a person who is alive when the future interest is created and whose life is relevant to the vesting of the interest
• Measuring lives can include the grantor, the beneficiaries of the future interest, or any other individuals whose lives are explicitly mentioned in the grant or will

Vesting period requirements

• To satisfy the rule against perpetuities, a future interest must be certain to vest, if at all, no later than 21 years after the death of a life in being
• This 21-year period is added to account for potential periods of gestation (unborn children) and minority (legal incapacity)
• If there is any possibility, however remote, that the interest might vest beyond the permitted period, the interest is void ab initio (from the beginning) under the common law rule

Restraints on alienation

• Restraints on alienation are provisions in a deed, will, or other instrument that attempt to prohibit or limit the transfer, sale, or encumbrance of real property by the owner
• The law generally disfavors restraints on alienation, as they can hinder the marketability and efficient use of land, but some limited restraints may be enforced if they serve a legitimate purpose and are not unreasonable
• There are three main types of restraints on alienation: disabling restraints, forfeiture restraints, and promissory restraints

Disabling restraints

• A disabling restraint is a provision that purports to make any transfer of the property by the owner void and of no legal effect
• Disabling restraints are generally unenforceable, as they directly contradict the owner's inherent right to transfer their property interest
• However, some jurisdictions may enforce disabling restraints in limited circumstances, such as in the context of affordable housing or conservation easements

Forfeiture restraints

• A forfeiture restraint is a provision that terminates the owner's interest in the property if they attempt to transfer it, causing the property to revert to the grantor or pass to a third party
• Forfeiture restraints are more likely to be enforced than disabling restraints, particularly if they are limited in scope and duration and serve a legitimate purpose
• Examples of potentially valid forfeiture restraints include provisions in a lease that terminate the tenant's interest upon assignment or subletting without the landlord's consent

Promissory restraints

• A promissory restraint is a provision that imposes a contractual obligation on the owner not to transfer the property, enforceable through damages or equitable remedies such as injunctions
• Promissory restraints are generally enforceable if they are reasonable in scope, duration, and purpose, and do not unduly restrain alienation
• Examples of promissory restraints include covenants not to compete in the sale of a business and agreements among co-owners not to partition or sell their interests without the consent of the others

Marketable title acts

• Marketable title acts are state statutes designed to simplify and streamline real estate transactions by extinguishing ancient title defects and interests that could cloud the title to property
• These acts promote the marketability and insurability of land by providing a mechanism for clearing title after a specified period of time, typically 20-40 years
• Marketable title acts vary by state but generally operate by establishing a "root of title" and eliminating any conflicting claims or interests that predate the root

Purpose of the acts

• The primary purpose of marketable title acts is to facilitate real estate transactions and reduce the costs and uncertainties associated with title examination
• By extinguishing old, often forgotten interests and defects, the acts make it easier for buyers, sellers, and lenders to determine the ownership and encumbrances on a property
• Marketable title acts also encourage the productive use and development of land by removing potential barriers to transfer and financing

Statutory requirements

• To claim the benefits of a marketable title act, a property owner must typically show an unbroken chain of title for the statutory period (e.g., 30 years) starting from a "root of title"
• A "root of title" is a recorded instrument, such as a deed or probate decree, that purports to create or transfer an interest in the property and has been of record for the required period
• The act will then extinguish any conflicting claims or interests that predate the root of title, subject to certain exceptions and requirements for preserving older interests

Exceptions to the acts

• Marketable title acts typically include exceptions for certain types of interests that are not extinguished by the statutory scheme, even if they predate the root of title
• Common exceptions include interests of the federal government, mineral rights, easements and covenants in active use, and interests that have been specifically identified and preserved in the chain of title
• Some acts also require older interest holders to record a notice of claim or take other steps to preserve their rights before the expiration of the statutory period

Waste doctrine

• The waste doctrine is a common law principle that governs the rights and obligations of parties with concurrent or successive interests in real property, such as life tenants and remaindermen
• It seeks to balance the life tenant's right to use and enjoy the property with the remainderman's interest in receiving the property in a reasonable condition at the end of the life estate
• The waste doctrine prohibits the life tenant from committing "waste," which is any action or omission that causes unreasonable or excessive harm to the property or diminishes its value

Affirmative vs permissive waste

• Affirmative waste involves the life tenant actively damaging or altering the property in a way that impairs its value, such as cutting down timber, demolishing buildings, or extracting minerals
• Permissive waste occurs when the life tenant fails to maintain or repair the property, allowing it to deteriorate beyond normal wear and tear, such as neglecting to fix a leaking roof or prevent erosion
• The line between permissible use and waste can vary depending on the nature of the property, local custom, and the terms of the instrument creating the life estate

Remedies for waste

• Remaindermen have several potential remedies against a life tenant who commits waste, depending on the nature and extent of the damage
• Injunctive relief may be available to prevent further waste or compel the life tenant to make necessary repairs or restoration
• Damages can be sought to compensate for the diminution in value caused by the waste, either in an action for waste or as part of a partition or accounting proceeding
• In extreme cases, the court may order a forfeiture of the life estate or appoint a receiver to manage the property and prevent further waste

Life tenant obligations

• To avoid liability for waste, life tenants must use the property in a reasonable manner and take steps to preserve its value for the remaindermen
• This includes making ordinary repairs, paying property taxes and insurance, and refraining from actions that would materially alter or harm the property
• Life tenants are generally entitled to the income and profits from the property, such as rent, crops, or timber, but must not deplete the resources or impair the long-term productivity of the land
• The specific obligations of a life tenant may be modified by the terms of the instrument creating the estate or by agreement with the remaindermen

Merger doctrine

• The merger doctrine is a common law principle that applies when the same person holds two or more consecutive estates in the same property, causing the lesser estate to be absorbed into the greater estate
• Merger is based on the idea that a person cannot be both the tenant and the landlord of the same property, as the rights and obligations of the two estates would be inconsistent
• The classic example of merger is when a life tenant acquires the remainder interest, causing the life estate to merge into the fee simple and be extinguished

Elements of merger

• For merger to occur, the consecutive estates must be held by the same person, in the same right, and without any intervening interests
• The estates must also be of the same quality, meaning they must both be legal or both be equitable interests
• Merger is generally automatic and occurs by operation of law, but some jurisdictions require a showing of intent or allow the parties to prevent merger through an express provision

Destruction of contingent remainders

• Under the common law doctrine of destructibility of contingent remainders, a contingent remainder would be destroyed if it failed to vest at or before the termination of the preceding freehold estate
• This could occur through merger, such as when the life tenant acquired the reversion, causing the life estate to merge into the fee simple and destroying any contingent remainders
• Many states have abolished the destructibility rule by statute or judicial decision, preserving contingent remainders even if the preceding estate terminates prematurely

Modern application of merger

• While the merger doctrine remains a part of property law, its practical impact has been reduced by statutory and judicial reforms
• Modern courts often look to the intent of the parties and the equities of the situation in determining whether to apply merger, rather than relying on strict formal requirements
• Merger can still be a relevant consideration in various contexts, such as interpreting wills and trusts, resolving title disputes, and determining the rights of creditors and other third parties