Organizations rely on various communication networks to function effectively. Formal networks follow official channels, while informal networks develop naturally among employees. Both play crucial roles in information flow and collaboration.
Communication structures like chain, wheel, all-channel, and hierarchical networks shape how information moves through an organization. Understanding these structures helps managers optimize communication and decision-making processes within their teams and departments.
Types of Communication Networks
Formal and Informal Networks
Top images from around the web for Formal and Informal Networks
Types of Organization network vs hierarchy – Michael Paskevicius View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Communication | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Organizational Networking | Information Systems View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Organization network vs hierarchy – Michael Paskevicius View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Communication | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Formal and Informal Networks
Types of Organization network vs hierarchy – Michael Paskevicius View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Communication | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Organizational Networking | Information Systems View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Organization network vs hierarchy – Michael Paskevicius View original
Is this image relevant?
Types of Communication | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Formal networks are officially recognized channels of communication within an organization that follow the and are used to convey work-related information
Informal networks develop naturally among employees based on personal relationships, common interests, or social interactions and often operate outside of the formal organizational structure
Formal networks are typically used for official business communication (memos, reports, meetings) while informal networks facilitate casual conversations, gossip, and the exchange of ideas (water cooler chats, lunch breaks)
Both formal and informal networks play important roles in organizational communication by enabling information flow, collaboration, and relationship building among employees
The Grapevine
The refers to the informal communication network within an organization that spreads information quickly through word-of-mouth, often bypassing official channels
Grapevine communication is highly efficient in disseminating information rapidly across the organization but can also lead to the spread of rumors, misinformation, or sensitive information
Managers should be aware of the grapevine's existence and its potential impact on employee morale, productivity, and decision-making
While the grapevine cannot be controlled, managers can mitigate its negative effects by providing timely, accurate, and transparent communication through formal channels to address rumors or concerns
Network Structures
Chain and Wheel Networks
involve linear communication where information flows sequentially from one person to another, following the hierarchical structure (manager to supervisor to employee)
have a central figure who communicates with all other members, acting as a hub for information exchange (team leader coordinating with team members)
Chain networks are suitable for organizations with clear lines of authority and specialized roles but can lead to communication delays and information distortion as messages pass through multiple levels
Wheel networks enable efficient communication and decision-making by centralizing information flow but can create bottlenecks and overload the central figure
All-Channel and Hierarchical Networks
allow free flow of communication among all members, promoting open dialogue, collaboration, and quick problem-solving (brainstorming sessions, project teams)
Hierarchical networks follow the formal organizational structure, with communication flowing vertically through defined channels based on authority and responsibility (top-down directives, bottom-up reporting)
All-channel networks foster creativity, innovation, and employee engagement but can lead to and difficulty in reaching consensus
Hierarchical networks maintain order, accountability, and control but can hinder cross-functional collaboration and limit the flow of ideas and feedback
Directions of Communication
Horizontal and Vertical Communication
occurs between individuals at the same hierarchical level, facilitating coordination, problem-solving, and knowledge sharing among peers (cross-functional teams, department meetings)
flows up and down the organizational hierarchy, either from superiors to subordinates (downward) or from subordinates to superiors (upward)
Downward vertical communication is used to convey instructions, policies, and feedback from management to employees (performance reviews, company-wide announcements)
Upward vertical communication allows employees to provide feedback, suggestions, and concerns to their superiors (employee surveys, open-door policies)
Diagonal Communication
involves the exchange of information between individuals at different hierarchical levels and in different departments or functions
Diagonal communication enables cross-functional collaboration, problem-solving, and innovation by bringing together diverse perspectives and expertise (project teams, task forces)
Diagonal communication can help break down silos, improve organizational agility, and foster a more inclusive and participative work environment
However, diagonal communication may also create confusion or conflict if not properly managed, as it can challenge traditional reporting lines and decision-making processes