7.4 Jurisdictional Challenges and Inter-Court Relations

Jurisdictional challenges in Native American law are complex, involving overlapping authority between tribal, state, and federal courts. These challenges impact everything from criminal cases to civil disputes, shaping the landscape of tribal sovereignty and inter-governmental relations.

Inter-court relations play a crucial role in navigating these jurisdictional waters. From recognizing judgments to cooperating on extradition, how courts interact across jurisdictional lines can make or break the effective administration of justice in Indian Country.

Jurisdiction Types

Concurrent and Exclusive Jurisdiction

Top images from around the web for Concurrent and Exclusive Jurisdiction

• 

  Free of Charge Creative Commons jurisdiction Image - Legal 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tribal sovereignty in the United States - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e – Second Edition) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free of Charge Creative Commons jurisdiction Image - Legal 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tribal sovereignty in the United States - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Concurrent and Exclusive Jurisdiction

• 

  Free of Charge Creative Commons jurisdiction Image - Legal 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tribal sovereignty in the United States - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e – Second Edition) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Free of Charge Creative Commons jurisdiction Image - Legal 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tribal sovereignty in the United States - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Concurrent jurisdiction allows multiple courts to hear the same case simultaneously
  • Occurs when two or more courts have authority over a specific legal matter
  • Common in cases involving both state and tribal jurisdictions
  • Enables parties to choose the most favorable forum for their case
• Exclusive jurisdiction grants sole authority to a specific court to hear certain cases
  • Prevents other courts from exercising power over the same matter
  • Often applies to federal courts in areas like bankruptcy or patent law
  • Tribal courts may have exclusive jurisdiction over certain on-reservation matters

Jurisdictional Conflicts and Relations

• State-tribal conflicts arise from overlapping authority on reservation lands
  • Disputes over taxation, law enforcement, and regulatory control
  • Public Law 280 transferred jurisdiction from federal to state governments in some states
  • Leads to complex legal battles and negotiations between state and tribal governments
• Federal-tribal relations shape the scope of tribal jurisdiction
  • Trust relationship establishes federal government as protector of tribal interests
  • Congress holds plenary power to limit or expand tribal sovereignty
  • Supreme Court decisions (Montana v. United States) have refined tribal jurisdiction over non-members

Inter-Court Relations

Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments

• Full faith and credit requires courts to honor judgments from other jurisdictions
  • Derived from Article IV of the U.S. Constitution
  • Applies to state and federal courts, but application to tribal courts varies
  • Some states have enacted laws extending full faith and credit to tribal court judgments
• Comity involves voluntary recognition of foreign judgments
  • Based on principles of mutual respect and cooperation between courts
  • Often used when full faith and credit does not apply
  • Allows courts to consider fairness and due process before enforcing judgments

Cooperation Between Courts

• Extradition facilitates transfer of individuals between jurisdictions
  • Process for returning fugitives to face charges or serve sentences
  • Tribal-state extradition agreements enhance law enforcement cooperation
  • Challenges arise when tribes lack formal extradition procedures
• Inter-tribal court agreements promote collaboration among different tribes
  • Establish protocols for sharing information and resources
  • Facilitate resolution of cross-border disputes between tribal nations
  • Enhance consistency in applying tribal law across multiple jurisdictions

Legal Procedures

Forum and Law Selection

• Choice of law determines which jurisdiction's laws apply to a case
  • Crucial in cases involving multiple jurisdictions or cross-border issues
  • Courts consider factors like parties' intent, location of events, and public policy
  • Tribal courts may apply tribal law, state law, or federal law depending on circumstances
• Forum selection involves choosing the court to hear a case
  • Parties may include forum selection clauses in contracts
  • Courts evaluate the validity and enforceability of these clauses
  • Considerations include convenience, fairness, and expertise of the chosen forum

Tribal Court Procedures

• Tribal court exhaustion requires parties to exhaust tribal remedies before seeking federal review
  • Established by the Supreme Court in National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe
  • Promotes tribal sovereignty and self-governance
  • Allows tribal courts to explain their basis for jurisdiction
  • Exceptions include bad faith, futility, or clear lack of tribal jurisdiction