is a proactive coastal management strategy that relocates communities and infrastructure away from high-risk areas. It addresses long-term climate change impacts, enhancing safety and resilience while preserving natural ecosystems.
This approach requires careful planning, , and interdisciplinary collaboration. It balances immediate economic impacts with goals, presenting both challenges and opportunities for coastal communities facing increasing environmental threats.
Definition of managed retreat
Managed retreat involves the strategic relocation of communities and infrastructure away from high-risk coastal areas to reduce vulnerability to sea-level rise, erosion, and flooding
Plays a crucial role in coastal resilience engineering by proactively addressing long-term climate change impacts and enhancing community safety
Requires interdisciplinary approach combining urban planning, environmental science, and social considerations
Historical context
Top images from around the web for Historical context
File:Hurricane Katrina August 28 2005 NASA.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Cape Hatteras lighthouse North Carolina.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Katrina 2nd landfall.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Hurricane Katrina August 28 2005 NASA.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Cape Hatteras lighthouse North Carolina.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Historical context
File:Hurricane Katrina August 28 2005 NASA.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Cape Hatteras lighthouse North Carolina.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Katrina 2nd landfall.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Hurricane Katrina August 28 2005 NASA.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:Cape Hatteras lighthouse North Carolina.jpg - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Emerged as a coastal management strategy in the late 20th century in response to increasing coastal hazards
Early examples include the relocation of Cape Hatteras Lighthouse in North Carolina (1999)
Gained prominence after major disasters like Hurricane Katrina (2005) highlighted vulnerabilities of coastal communities
Evolved from reactive post-disaster relocations to proactive planning for future climate risks
Key objectives
Reduce exposure to coastal hazards by moving people and assets out of high-risk areas
Minimize long-term costs associated with repeated disaster recovery and infrastructure maintenance
Preserve natural coastal ecosystems by allowing for their landward migration as sea levels rise
Enhance community resilience through strategic relocation to safer areas
Balance immediate economic impacts with long-term sustainability and safety goals
Planning process for retreat
Involves comprehensive assessment of coastal risks, community needs, and environmental factors
Requires long-term vision and adaptive planning to account for changing climate conditions
Integrates scientific data, economic analysis, and social considerations to develop effective retreat strategies
Stakeholder engagement
Involves early and continuous communication with affected communities, local governments, and property owners
Utilizes public meetings, workshops, and surveys to gather input and address concerns
Incorporates local knowledge and preferences into retreat planning
Addresses potential conflicts and builds consensus through facilitated dialogues
Ensures transparency in decision-making processes to build trust and support
Risk assessment
Evaluates current and future coastal hazards using climate projections and sea-level rise scenarios
Assesses vulnerability of infrastructure, buildings, and populations to flooding, erosion, and storm surge
Utilizes GIS mapping and modeling tools to identify high-risk areas and prioritize retreat zones
Considers cascading impacts on critical systems (transportation, utilities, emergency services)
Incorporates uncertainty analysis to account for different climate change scenarios
Cost-benefit analysis
Compares long-term costs of maintaining coastal defenses vs. implementing managed retreat
Quantifies potential losses from future disasters and recurring damages
Evaluates economic benefits of new land uses in retreat areas (recreation, tourism, ecosystem services)
Assesses social costs and benefits, including community disruption and improved quality of life
Incorporates non-monetary factors such as environmental preservation and cultural heritage
Implementation strategies
Require careful planning and phasing to minimize disruption and maximize effectiveness
Must be tailored to local contexts, considering social, economic, and environmental factors
Often involve a combination of approaches to address diverse community needs and constraints
Voluntary vs mandatory relocation
Voluntary programs offer incentives for residents to relocate willingly (financial assistance, property swaps)
Mandatory relocation involves government-enforced moves, typically used in high-risk or post-disaster scenarios
Voluntary approaches often face challenges of low participation rates and selective migration
Mandatory relocations can lead to social resistance and legal challenges
may combine voluntary incentives with eventual mandatory measures for holdouts
Phased vs immediate withdrawal
Phased withdrawal involves gradual relocation over extended periods (years to decades)
Allows for smoother transitions and adaptive planning
Reduces immediate economic shocks and social disruption
Immediate withdrawal occurs rapidly, often in response to acute disasters or imminent threats
Minimizes exposure to immediate risks
Can be more challenging to implement due to logistical and social complexities
Choice between phased and immediate withdrawal depends on risk urgency and community readiness
Buyout programs
Government purchases properties in high-risk areas at fair market value
Can be voluntary or mandatory, depending on risk level and policy framework
Often include relocation assistance and support for finding new housing
Acquired properties are typically converted to open space or natural buffers
Challenges include funding limitations, property valuation disputes, and ensuring equitable participation
Successful examples include New York's post-Hurricane Sandy buyout program in Staten Island
Environmental considerations
Managed retreat offers opportunities to restore and enhance coastal ecosystems
Requires careful planning to minimize ecological disruption during relocation process
Integrates with broader and climate adaptation strategies
Ecosystem restoration
Allows for the re-establishment of natural coastal habitats (wetlands, mangroves, dunes)
Removes artificial structures that impede natural coastal processes
Enhances biodiversity by creating space for species migration and adaptation
Improves water quality by reducing urban runoff and pollution sources
Requires active restoration efforts such as native plant reintroduction and invasive species management
Habitat conservation
Preserves critical habitats for threatened and endangered coastal species
Creates corridors for wildlife movement and adaptation to changing conditions
Protects breeding and nesting sites for migratory birds and marine animals
Maintains genetic diversity by allowing for natural ecosystem dynamics
Integrates with broader conservation initiatives and protected area networks
Natural flood protection
Restores natural flood buffers such as salt marshes, mangroves, and coastal forests
Enhances the capacity of ecosystems to absorb and dissipate wave energy
Reduces erosion rates and stabilizes shorelines through vegetation and sediment processes
Provides cost-effective alternatives to hard engineering solutions (seawalls, levees)
Improves water retention and groundwater recharge, reducing flood risks in adjacent areas
Social and economic impacts
Managed retreat significantly affects community structures, local economies, and individual livelihoods
Requires comprehensive planning to address both short-term disruptions and long-term transformations
Presents opportunities for community reinvention and sustainable development in new locations
Community displacement
Involves the physical relocation of residents, businesses, and community facilities
Disrupts social networks, cultural practices, and sense of place
Requires careful planning to maintain community cohesion in new locations
Presents challenges for vulnerable populations (elderly, low-income, minorities)
Offers opportunities for improving housing quality and community design in relocation sites
Property value changes
Typically leads to decreased property values in retreat zones due to increased risk perception
Can result in increased values in safer areas designated for relocation
Impacts local tax bases and municipal revenues
Requires mechanisms to compensate property owners for losses
May create speculative real estate markets in both retreat and receiving areas
Economic restructuring
Shifts economic activities away from coastal-dependent industries (fishing, tourism)
Encourages development of new economic sectors in relocation areas
Impacts job markets and employment patterns
Requires workforce retraining and economic diversification strategies
Presents opportunities for developing more resilient and sustainable local economies
Legal and policy frameworks
Managed retreat requires robust legal and policy foundations to ensure effective implementation
Involves complex interactions between federal, state, and local regulations
Must balance private property rights with public safety and environmental protection goals
Land use regulations
Implements coastal setback lines and building restrictions in high-risk areas
Establishes special management zones for gradual retreat implementation
Requires updates to comprehensive plans and local ordinances
Integrates future climate projections into land use decision-making
Faces challenges of grandfathered properties and existing development rights
Eminent domain
Allows government acquisition of private property for public use with just compensation
Can be used as a last resort for mandatory relocations in high-risk areas
Faces legal and political challenges due to property rights concerns
Requires clear demonstration of public benefit and necessity
Often combined with voluntary programs to minimize use of powers
Zoning changes
Rezones high-risk coastal areas for low-intensity uses (open space, recreation)
Creates new zones in safer areas to accommodate relocated development
Implements overlay districts with special retreat-related regulations
Faces challenges of existing non-conforming uses and development expectations
Requires coordination between multiple jurisdictions for regional effectiveness
Funding mechanisms
Adequate and sustainable funding is crucial for successful managed retreat implementation
Requires diverse funding sources to address various aspects of retreat (property acquisition, relocation assistance, )
Involves complex financial planning to balance immediate costs with long-term benefits
Government grants
Federal programs like FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program provide funding for retreat projects
State-level grants support local governments in planning and implementing retreat strategies
Often require cost-sharing or matching funds from local sources
Can be competitive and limited in availability, requiring strategic project development
May have specific eligibility criteria and reporting requirements
Insurance programs
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) influences retreat decisions through risk-based premiums
Some insurers offer coverage for managed retreat expenses or relocation costs
Risk transfer mechanisms (catastrophe bonds, parametric insurance) can support large-scale retreat efforts
Challenges include maintaining affordable coverage while accurately reflecting risk
Opportunities for developing new insurance products tailored to managed retreat scenarios
Public-private partnerships
Collaborations between government agencies, private developers, and non-profit organizations
Can leverage private capital for large-scale retreat and redevelopment projects
Involves risk-sharing arrangements and innovative financing models
Examples include green bonds for ecosystem restoration in retreat areas
Requires careful structuring to ensure public benefits and equitable outcomes
Case studies
Provide valuable insights into the practical challenges and successes of managed retreat
Offer lessons for improving future retreat planning and implementation
Demonstrate the diverse contexts and approaches to managed retreat globally
Successful retreat examples
Isle de Jean Charles, Louisiana: Relocation of Native American community due to severe land loss
Grantham, Australia: Post-flood voluntary relocation program with high participation rates
Oakwood Beach, New York: Community-led buyout program after Hurricane Sandy
Kiruna, Sweden: Phased relocation of entire town due to mining-induced ground instability