7.2 Performance appraisal methods

Performance appraisals are vital for evaluating employee performance and aligning individual goals with company objectives. They involve setting clear standards, providing feedback, and using results to inform decisions on promotions, compensation, and training needs.

Various methods exist for conducting appraisals, from traditional approaches like graphic rating scales to modern techniques such as 360-degree feedback. Each method has its strengths and limitations, and organizations must choose the most appropriate approach for their needs.

Importance of performance appraisals

• Performance appraisals play a crucial role in evaluating employee job performance, identifying strengths and weaknesses, and providing feedback for improvement
• Appraisals help align individual goals with organizational objectives, ensuring that employees contribute effectively to the company's success
• Regular performance evaluations foster open communication between managers and employees, building trust and enhancing employee engagement

Key elements of effective appraisals

• Clearly defined performance standards and expectations that are communicated to employees in advance
• Objective and measurable criteria for assessing performance, minimizing subjectivity and bias
• Consistent application of appraisal methods across the organization to ensure fairness and equity
• Timely feedback provided to employees, allowing them to make necessary improvements and adjustments
• Use of appraisal results for making informed decisions regarding promotions, compensation, and training needs

Traditional appraisal methods

Graphic rating scales

Top images from around the web for Graphic rating scales

• 

  Functions of Human Resources Management | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Steps in the Appraisal Process | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Appraisal Methods | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Functions of Human Resources Management | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Steps in the Appraisal Process | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Graphic rating scales

• 

  Functions of Human Resources Management | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Steps in the Appraisal Process | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Appraisal Methods | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Functions of Human Resources Management | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Steps in the Appraisal Process | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Employees are rated on a scale for various performance factors (communication skills, teamwork, punctuality)
• Scales typically range from unsatisfactory to outstanding, with each level clearly defined
• Allows for quick and easy comparison of employees across different performance dimensions

Essay appraisal method

• Managers write a narrative description of an employee's performance, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and specific achievements
• Provides a more comprehensive and personalized evaluation compared to rating scales
• Requires more time and effort from managers to compose well-written and insightful essays

Critical incident method

• Focuses on specific instances of exceptionally good or poor performance rather than overall performance
• Managers record and discuss these critical incidents with employees to reinforce positive behavior or address areas for improvement
• Helps identify patterns of behavior and provides concrete examples for feedback and coaching

Checklist method

• Managers complete a standardized checklist of performance-related statements, indicating whether each statement applies to the employee
• Statements may include "consistently meets deadlines" or "demonstrates strong problem-solving skills"
• Provides a structured approach to appraisal but may not capture nuances in performance

Forced choice method

• Managers are presented with sets of statements and must choose the statement that best describes the employee's performance
• Statements are designed to be equally favorable, reducing leniency or strictness bias
• Can be time-consuming and may not provide a comprehensive evaluation of performance

Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)

• Combines elements of graphic rating scales and critical incident methods
• Specific behaviors are used as anchors for each point on the rating scale, providing clear examples of expected performance
• Helps reduce subjectivity by focusing on observable behaviors rather than traits or general descriptions

Modern appraisal techniques

Management by objectives (MBO)

• Employees and managers collaboratively set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals
• Progress towards goals is regularly monitored and evaluated
• Emphasizes employee participation and aligns individual objectives with organizational goals

360-degree feedback

• Feedback is collected from multiple sources, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and sometimes customers or clients
• Provides a more comprehensive view of an employee's performance and behavior
• Helps identify blind spots and areas for development that may not be apparent to the employee or their manager

Psychological appraisals

• Assesses an employee's potential for future performance and growth rather than solely focusing on past performance
• May include personality assessments, cognitive ability tests, or leadership assessments
• Helps identify high-potential employees and inform succession planning and leadership development

Assessment centers

• Employees participate in a series of simulated work exercises, role-plays, and group discussions
• Trained assessors observe and evaluate participants' behavior and performance
• Provides a comprehensive assessment of an employee's skills, abilities, and potential for future roles

Human resource accounting

• Attempts to quantify the economic value of an organization's human resources
• Considers factors such as the cost of acquiring, developing, and retaining employees
• Helps organizations make informed decisions regarding investments in human capital and the impact on overall performance

Appraisal interviews

Preparing for the interview

• Review the employee's performance data, goals, and previous appraisals
• Identify key points for discussion, including strengths, areas for improvement, and future objectives
• Schedule the interview in advance, allowing the employee time to prepare and reflect on their performance

Conducting the interview

• Create a supportive and open environment that encourages honest communication
• Begin with positive feedback, acknowledging the employee's accomplishments and contributions
• Discuss areas for improvement constructively, focusing on specific behaviors and providing examples
• Collaboratively set goals and development plans for the upcoming period

Post-interview actions

• Document the key points discussed during the interview, including agreed-upon goals and action items
• Follow up with the employee to ensure they have the necessary resources and support to achieve their goals
• Monitor progress and provide ongoing feedback and coaching throughout the performance cycle

Potential appraisal biases

Halo vs horn effect

• Halo effect occurs when a manager's positive impression of an employee in one area influences their ratings in other areas
• Horn effect is the opposite, where a negative impression in one area leads to lower ratings across all performance dimensions
• Managers should evaluate each performance factor independently to minimize these biases

Central tendency bias

• Managers tend to rate most employees as average, avoiding extreme ratings on either end of the scale
• Results in a lack of differentiation between high and low performers
• Managers should be trained to use the full range of the rating scale when appropriate

Leniency vs strictness bias

• Leniency bias occurs when managers consistently give high ratings, while strictness bias involves consistently giving low ratings
• Can lead to a lack of fairness and equity in the appraisal process
• Managers should be aware of their own tendencies and strive for objectivity in their evaluations

Recency bias

• Managers may place undue emphasis on an employee's most recent performance, neglecting to consider their performance throughout the entire appraisal period
• Can result in a skewed evaluation that does not accurately reflect the employee's overall performance
• Managers should maintain ongoing records of performance and consider the entire appraisal period when conducting evaluations

Legal considerations in appraisals

• Appraisals must be free from discrimination based on protected characteristics (race, gender, age, religion, disability)
• Performance standards should be job-related and consistent with business necessity
• Appraisal systems should be applied consistently across all employees in similar roles
• Documentation of appraisals should be maintained to support employment decisions and protect against legal claims

Appraisal feedback and communication

• Feedback should be specific, timely, and actionable, focusing on behaviors rather than personal characteristics
• Managers should use active listening skills and allow employees to provide input and ask questions
• Feedback should be balanced, recognizing both strengths and areas for improvement
• Communication should be ongoing, not limited to formal appraisal meetings

Linking appraisals to rewards and development

• Appraisal results should inform decisions regarding merit pay increases, bonuses, and promotions
• Identify high-potential employees and create targeted development plans to support their growth and advancement
• Use appraisal data to identify common skill gaps and training needs across the organization
• Ensure that rewards and development opportunities are allocated fairly and consistently based on performance

Evaluating the effectiveness of appraisal systems

• Regularly assess the appraisal system's ability to accurately measure performance and provide meaningful feedback
• Seek input from managers and employees on the system's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement
• Monitor the impact of appraisals on employee engagement, motivation, and performance over time
• Continuously refine the appraisal process based on feedback and best practices to ensure its ongoing effectiveness and relevance to the organization's goals and values