7.5 Power and decision-making

Power dynamics shape organizational decision-making, influencing who has a say and what choices are made. From formal roles to informal networks, power sources determine how problems are framed, information is shared, and alternatives are evaluated.

Understanding power in decision-making helps navigate the complexities of organizational politics. By recognizing influence tactics, biases, and ethical considerations, leaders can foster more inclusive and effective decision processes that balance diverse interests.

Sources of power in decision-making

• Power plays a crucial role in organizational decision-making, influencing who has a say, what options are considered, and which choices are ultimately made
• Sources of power can be categorized into formal and informal, individual and group, and based on resource control

Formal vs informal power

Top images from around the web for Formal vs informal power

• 

  Chapter 4: Organizational Structure and Project Management – NSCC Project Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Key Elements of Effective Organizations: Bridgespan’s Organization Wheel | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  6.4 Organizing – Foundations of Business View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 4: Organizational Structure and Project Management – NSCC Project Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Key Elements of Effective Organizations: Bridgespan’s Organization Wheel | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Formal vs informal power

• 

  Chapter 4: Organizational Structure and Project Management – NSCC Project Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Key Elements of Effective Organizations: Bridgespan’s Organization Wheel | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  6.4 Organizing – Foundations of Business View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 4: Organizational Structure and Project Management – NSCC Project Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Key Elements of Effective Organizations: Bridgespan’s Organization Wheel | Bridgespan View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Formal power stems from official roles, titles, and hierarchy within the organization (CEO, manager, supervisor)
• Informal power arises from personal characteristics, relationships, expertise, and social influence
  • Includes charisma, persuasion skills, and social networks
• Informal power can sometimes override formal authority in shaping decisions and outcomes

Individual vs group power

• Individual power refers to the influence wielded by a single person based on their formal role, expertise, or personal qualities
  • Examples include a respected expert swaying opinions or a charismatic leader rallying support
• Group power arises from collective action, shared interests, and strength in numbers
  • Includes teams, departments, unions, and stakeholder coalitions
• Group power can counterbalance or challenge individual power in decision-making processes

Resource control and power

• Control over critical resources grants power in decision-making
  • Resources include budgets, information, technology, and personnel
• Departments or individuals controlling scarce or essential resources have greater influence
  • IT controlling data access or finance controlling budgets
• Withholding or granting access to resources can be used to shape decisions and outcomes

Stages of decision-making process

• Organizational decision-making typically follows a multi-stage process, with power dynamics at play throughout
• Stages include problem identification, information gathering, alternative generation, selection, implementation, and monitoring

Problem identification and framing

• Recognizing and defining the problem or opportunity is the first step
  • What issues need to be addressed? What objectives should be pursued?
• Framing the problem involves setting boundaries, assumptions, and priorities
• Power influences which problems get attention and how they are framed
  • Leaders or groups can highlight or downplay issues to advance their interests

Information gathering and analysis

• Collecting relevant data, facts, and perspectives to inform the decision
• Analyzing information to understand causes, patterns, and potential solutions
• Power shapes which information is sought, shared, or withheld
  • Selective disclosure or spin can manipulate perceptions and decisions

Alternative generation and evaluation

• Developing a range of potential courses of action to address the problem
• Evaluating alternatives based on criteria such as feasibility, cost, risk, and alignment with goals
• Power influences which alternatives are proposed, promoted, or dismissed
  • Dominant individuals or groups can restrict options or steer towards preferred choices

Selection and implementation

• Choosing the best course of action from the alternatives
• Allocating resources and responsibilities to carry out the decision
• Power determines who has the final say and how the decision is enacted
  • Formal authority, coalitions, or influence tactics can sway the outcome

Monitoring and feedback

• Tracking the implementation and results of the decision
• Gathering feedback to assess effectiveness and make adjustments
• Power affects how performance is measured, interpreted, and communicated
  • Selective metrics or narratives can shape perceptions of success or failure

Power dynamics in decision-making

• Power is not static but dynamically negotiated and contested throughout the decision-making process
• Influence tactics, alliances, conflict, and conformity all shape how power is wielded and decisions are made

Influence tactics and strategies

• Individuals and groups use various tactics to gain or exercise power in decision-making
  • Includes persuasion, bargaining, pressure, and manipulation
• Common strategies are forming alliances, controlling information, and framing issues
• Effective influence involves understanding power dynamics and adapting tactics to the situation

Coalitions and alliances

• Forming alliances with others who share interests or goals can amplify power
  • Departments joining forces or leaders building support among key stakeholders
• Coalitions pool resources, coordinate actions, and present a united front
• Shifting coalitions and alliances can alter the balance of power during decision-making

Conflict and negotiation

• Decision-making often involves conflict between competing interests, ideas, or factions
• Negotiation is the process of resolving conflicts and reaching agreements
  • Includes bargaining, compromise, and finding mutually beneficial solutions
• Power shapes negotiation by determining bargaining strength and acceptable outcomes

Conformity and groupthink

• Group dynamics can lead to conformity, where individuals suppress dissent to maintain harmony
• Groupthink occurs when the desire for unanimity overrides critical thinking
  • Results in poor decisions that ignore risks or alternatives
• Unequal power within a group can stifle diverse perspectives and lead to blind spots

Biases and heuristics in decision-making

• Cognitive biases and mental shortcuts (heuristics) can lead to suboptimal decisions
• Power can exacerbate biases by limiting diverse inputs and promoting overconfidence
• Awareness of biases and structured processes can help mitigate their impact

Cognitive biases and limitations

• Biases are systematic errors in judgment that deviate from rational choice
  • Includes confirmation bias, anchoring, and availability bias
• Cognitive limitations, such as bounded rationality, constrain our ability to process information
• Power can amplify biases by reducing the motivation to carefully consider alternatives

Intuition vs rational analysis

• Intuition is the use of gut feelings, past experiences, and snap judgments to make decisions
• Rational analysis involves structured gathering and evaluation of information
• Power can lead to over-reliance on intuition, especially under time pressure or uncertainty
  • Powerful decision-makers may dismiss analysis that contradicts their instincts

Framing effects and anchoring

• Framing is the way a problem or decision is presented, which influences preferences
  • Positive vs negative framing, inclusion or exclusion of certain facts
• Anchoring is the tendency to rely heavily on the first piece of information offered
• Power can be used to strategically frame issues or anchor discussions to shape outcomes

Overconfidence and optimism bias

• Overconfidence is the tendency to overestimate one's abilities, knowledge, or chances of success
• Optimism bias is the belief that one's chances of experiencing negative events are lower than average
• Power can fuel overconfidence and optimism bias, leading to risky or unrealistic decisions
  • Powerful leaders may ignore warnings or discount potential downsides

Ethical considerations in decision-making

• Power in decision-making raises ethical questions about fairness, transparency, stakeholder interests, and long-term consequences
• Ethical decision-making involves considering multiple perspectives, following principles, and taking responsibility for outcomes

Fairness and justice

• Ensuring that decisions are impartial, non-discriminatory, and respectful of rights
• Distributing benefits and burdens equitably among stakeholders
• Power imbalances can lead to favoritism, bias, or exploitation in decisions

Transparency and accountability

• Being open and honest about the decision-making process, criteria, and rationale
• Taking responsibility for the consequences of decisions and rectifying any harm caused
• Opaque or unaccountable power structures enable unethical decisions and abuses

Stakeholder interests and values

• Considering the needs, concerns, and values of all parties affected by a decision
• Balancing competing interests and finding solutions that create shared value
• Powerful actors may prioritize their own interests at the expense of others

Long-term vs short-term consequences

• Evaluating the potential long-term impacts and ripple effects of a decision
• Avoiding short-sighted choices that provide immediate gains but cause lasting harm
• Power can breed a focus on short-term wins over sustainable, responsible outcomes

Improving decision-making with power

• While power can distort decision-making, it can also be harnessed to improve the process and outcomes
• Strategies include fostering inclusion, encouraging dissent, planning for risks, and using decision support tools

Inclusive and participatory processes

• Involving a diverse range of stakeholders in the decision-making process
• Seeking out and valuing multiple perspectives, experiences, and areas of expertise
• Sharing power through participatory structures like committees, task forces, and feedback channels

Devil's advocacy and constructive dissent

• Actively encouraging critical questioning and challenging of assumptions
• Assigning roles to argue against the prevailing view or proposed decision
• Protecting and rewarding constructive dissent to counteract conformity and groupthink

Scenario planning and risk assessment

• Systematically envisioning and preparing for a range of possible future scenarios
• Identifying potential risks, uncertainties, and unintended consequences of decisions
• Using structured tools like SWOT analysis, decision trees, and risk matrices

Decision support systems and tools

• Leveraging technology and data to inform and enhance decision-making
• Examples include business intelligence dashboards, predictive analytics, and simulation models
• Establishing clear decision-making frameworks, criteria, and processes
• Training decision-makers on effective problem-solving, bias awareness, and ethical reasoning