Sampling methods are crucial in marketing research, determining how data is collected and analyzed. Probability sampling allows for statistical inferences, while non-probability sampling is quicker and more cost-effective. Each method has its strengths and weaknesses, impacting research outcomes.
Choosing the right sampling method depends on research goals, population characteristics, and available resources. Probability methods like simple random and stratified sampling offer representativeness, while non-probability methods like convenience and snowball sampling can be useful for exploratory research or hard-to-reach populations.
Sampling Methods in Marketing Research
Probability vs non-probability sampling
Top images from around the web for Probability vs non-probability sampling 6.1: Reading- The Marketing Research Process - Business LibreTexts View original
Is this image relevant?
Sampling (statistics) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Sampling Techniques | OER Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
6.1: Reading- The Marketing Research Process - Business LibreTexts View original
Is this image relevant?
Sampling (statistics) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Probability vs non-probability sampling 6.1: Reading- The Marketing Research Process - Business LibreTexts View original
Is this image relevant?
Sampling (statistics) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Sampling Techniques | OER Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
6.1: Reading- The Marketing Research Process - Business LibreTexts View original
Is this image relevant?
Sampling (statistics) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Probability sampling assigns each population element a known, non-zero chance of selection
Enables statistical inferences about the population from sample data
Preferred when representativeness and generalizability are crucial (consumer surveys, market share studies)
Non-probability sampling selects elements based on convenience, judgment, or other non-random criteria
Does not support statistical inferences about the population
Suitable for quick, cost-effective, or exploratory research (product concept tests, focus groups)
Types of probability sampling
Simple random sampling (SRS) gives each element an equal chance of selection
Requires a complete sampling frame listing all population elements
Can be conducted with replacement (element can be selected multiple times) or without replacement (element removed after selection)
Systematic sampling selects elements at regular intervals from a ranked list
Interval k = N n k = \frac{N}{n} k = n N , where N N N = population size and n n n = sample size
Randomly chooses a starting point between 1 and k k k , then selects every k k k th element
Stratified sampling divides population into mutually exclusive, exhaustive subgroups (strata)
Conducts SRS within each stratum to ensure representation of key subgroups (age, gender, income)
Can be proportionate (stratum sample size proportional to population stratum size) or disproportionate
Cluster sampling divides population into mutually exclusive, exhaustive clusters (geographic regions, retail outlets)
Randomly selects a subset of clusters, then includes all elements within chosen clusters
Useful when a complete list of population elements is unavailable
Non-probability sampling techniques
Convenience sampling selects elements based on their convenience and availability
Advantages: quick, inexpensive, easy to implement (mall intercepts, online panels)
Disadvantages: high risk of bias, not representative, results not generalizable
Judgment sampling selects elements based on researcher's judgment or expertise
Advantages: targets specific respondents, useful for exploratory research (industry experts, trendsetters)
Disadvantages: prone to researcher bias, not representative, results not generalizable
Quota sampling selects elements based on predetermined quotas for specific subgroups
Advantages: ensures representation of key subgroups, more structured than convenience sampling (age, gender quotas)
Disadvantages: non-random selection within subgroups, potential bias, results not generalizable
Snowball sampling starts with initial respondents, then asks them to refer other potential respondents
Advantages: useful for hard-to-reach or hidden populations (rare disease sufferers, niche hobbyists), quickly builds large sample
Disadvantages: prone to bias, not representative, results not generalizable
Selection of sampling methods
Consider research objectives
Exploratory research may use non-probability methods (focus groups for new product ideas)
Descriptive or causal research often requires probability methods (customer satisfaction surveys)
Evaluate target population characteristics
Homogeneous populations suitable for SRS (members of a professional association)
Heterogeneous populations may benefit from stratified or cluster sampling (national consumer study)
Hard-to-reach populations may require snowball sampling (illicit drug users)
Assess available resources
Budget, time, personnel constraints may favor non-probability methods (convenience sampling for student projects)
Probability methods require more resources but yield more reliable results (government-funded health study)
Balance trade-offs between representativeness, generalizability, cost, and feasibility
Prioritize methods aligning with research objectives and population characteristics
Consider hybrid approaches combining probability and non-probability methods (stratified sampling with convenience sampling within strata)