7.2 Secondary sources

Secondary sources are essential tools in political research, offering analysis and interpretation of primary data. They include scholarly books, articles, textbooks, and government reports, each providing unique perspectives on political topics.

These sources offer advantages like comprehensive coverage and expert analysis, but also have limitations such as potential bias. Researchers must carefully evaluate secondary sources, considering factors like author expertise and publication date, to use them effectively in their work.

Types of secondary sources

• Secondary sources are works that analyze, interpret, or discuss information originally presented in primary sources
• They provide a layer of analysis and interpretation between the original source and the researcher
• Secondary sources can take many forms, each with its own strengths and limitations

Scholarly books

Top images from around the web for Scholarly books

• 

  What are scholarly resources? - WR122 Amy Warren - Research Guides at Clackamas Community College View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scholarly Articles | College Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lupine Publishers | Peer Review Process | Academic Publisher View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What are scholarly resources? - WR122 Amy Warren - Research Guides at Clackamas Community College View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scholarly Articles | College Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Scholarly books

• 

  What are scholarly resources? - WR122 Amy Warren - Research Guides at Clackamas Community College View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scholarly Articles | College Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lupine Publishers | Peer Review Process | Academic Publisher View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What are scholarly resources? - WR122 Amy Warren - Research Guides at Clackamas Community College View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scholarly Articles | College Writing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• In-depth, comprehensive treatment of a topic written by experts in the field
• Often published by academic presses and subject to peer review
• Can provide a broad overview of a subject or delve into specific aspects (The Clash of Civilizations by Samuel Huntington)
• May synthesize information from multiple primary sources and offer original analysis

Scholarly articles

• Focused, in-depth analysis of a specific research question or topic
• Published in peer-reviewed academic journals after undergoing rigorous evaluation
• Often present original research findings or offer new interpretations of existing data
• Typically more up-to-date than books due to shorter publication timelines (Foreign Affairs, International Security)

Textbooks

• Designed to provide an overview of a subject for educational purposes
• Often written by experts in the field and updated regularly to reflect current knowledge
• Synthesize information from various sources to present a coherent narrative
• May simplify complex topics for a student audience (Introduction to International Relations by Joseph Grieco)

Reference works

• Provide quick access to factual information, definitions, and overviews
• Include encyclopedias, dictionaries, almanacs, and atlases (The Encyclopedia of Political Science)
• Often compiled by teams of experts and subject to editorial oversight
• Useful for background information and context, but may lack in-depth analysis

Government reports

• Official publications by government agencies or international organizations
• Can provide authoritative data, policy analysis, and recommendations (World Bank Development Reports)
• May reflect the priorities and perspectives of the issuing body
• Useful for understanding official positions and accessing reliable data

Think tank publications

• Research and analysis produced by independent, often non-profit, organizations
• Can offer in-depth policy analysis and recommendations (Brookings Institution, RAND Corporation)
• May have a particular ideological or political leaning
• Useful for understanding current policy debates and proposals

News media articles

• Provide current, often real-time coverage of events and issues
• Can offer insights into public opinion and media framing of topics
• Range from in-depth investigative reporting to brief news summaries (The New York Times, BBC News)
• May be subject to editorial bias and constraints of news production cycles

Documentaries

• Audio-visual works that explore a topic in depth, often featuring interviews and primary source material
• Can provide engaging, accessible introductions to complex topics (The Fog of War, The World at War)
• May have a particular perspective or agenda, depending on the filmmaker's goals
• Useful for bringing topics to life and reaching a broader audience

Advantages of secondary sources

• Secondary sources offer several key advantages for researchers, making them an essential part of the research process
• They can save time and effort by synthesizing large amounts of primary source material
• Secondary sources also benefit from the expertise and analytical skills of their authors

Comprehensive coverage

• Secondary sources often provide a broad, comprehensive overview of a topic
• They can synthesize information from multiple primary sources to create a coherent narrative
• This can be especially useful for understanding complex topics or historical events (The Origins of the Second World War by A.J.P. Taylor)
• Comprehensive coverage can help researchers identify key themes, debates, and gaps in the literature

Expert analysis and interpretation

• Secondary sources are typically written by experts in the field with specialized knowledge and analytical skills
• They can offer insights and interpretations that may not be immediately apparent from primary sources alone
• Expert analysis can help researchers understand the significance and implications of primary source material
• It can also provide a model for how to approach and analyze primary sources

Identification of patterns and trends

• By synthesizing information from multiple sources, secondary sources can identify patterns and trends that may not be visible in individual primary sources
• This can be especially useful for understanding long-term historical developments or cross-cultural comparisons (The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers by Paul Kennedy)
• Identifying patterns and trends can help researchers generate new research questions and hypotheses

Synthesis of primary sources

• Secondary sources often bring together information from multiple primary sources to create a more complete picture of a topic
• This can save researchers time and effort by reducing the need to locate and analyze every relevant primary source
• Synthesis can also help researchers identify connections and relationships between different primary sources
• This can lead to new insights and interpretations that may not be apparent from examining primary sources in isolation

Peer review process

• Many secondary sources, particularly scholarly books and articles, undergo a rigorous peer review process before publication
• Peer review involves evaluation of the work by other experts in the field to ensure its quality, accuracy, and significance
• This process can help to filter out low-quality or unreliable sources
• Peer-reviewed sources are generally considered more trustworthy and authoritative than non-reviewed sources

Limitations of secondary sources

• While secondary sources offer many advantages, they also have several limitations that researchers must be aware of
• These limitations can affect the reliability, accuracy, and applicability of the information provided
• Researchers must carefully evaluate secondary sources to ensure they are appropriate for their specific research needs

Potential for bias

• Secondary sources are not immune to bias, as authors may have their own perspectives, agendas, or ideological leanings
• This can affect the way they interpret and present information from primary sources
• Bias can be particularly problematic when dealing with controversial or politically charged topics
• Researchers must be alert to potential biases and seek out sources with different perspectives to get a more balanced understanding

Lack of direct access to data

• Secondary sources typically do not provide direct access to the raw data or primary source material they are based on
• This can make it difficult for researchers to verify the accuracy or reliability of the information presented
• It can also limit researchers' ability to reanalyze data or draw their own conclusions
• In some cases, researchers may need to consult primary sources directly to get a more complete understanding

Dependence on primary sources

• Secondary sources are only as reliable as the primary sources they are based on
• If the primary sources are incomplete, inaccurate, or biased, this can affect the quality of the secondary source
• Researchers must be aware of the limitations of the primary sources used in a secondary source
• They may need to consult additional primary sources to get a more complete or accurate picture

Time lag in publication

• There is often a significant time lag between the events or phenomena being studied and the publication of secondary sources analyzing them
• This can be especially problematic in rapidly changing fields or when dealing with current events
• The information in secondary sources may be outdated or superseded by new developments
• Researchers must be aware of the publication date of secondary sources and seek out the most up-to-date information

Generalization vs specificity

• Secondary sources often aim to provide a broad overview or synthesis of a topic, which can lead to generalization
• This can be useful for understanding the big picture, but may lack the specificity needed for more focused research questions
• Researchers may need to consult more specialized secondary sources or primary sources to get the level of detail they need
• Generalization can also obscure important variations or exceptions within a topic

Evaluating secondary sources

• Given the limitations of secondary sources, it is essential for researchers to carefully evaluate them before using them in their work
• Evaluation involves assessing the quality, reliability, and relevance of a source for a particular research project
• Several key factors should be considered when evaluating secondary sources

Authority and expertise of author

• The qualifications and expertise of the author can be a good indicator of the quality and reliability of a secondary source
• Look for authors who have advanced degrees, academic appointments, or significant professional experience in the relevant field
• Authors who are widely cited by other experts in the field are generally considered more authoritative
• Be cautious of sources written by authors with no apparent expertise or credentials in the subject matter

Publisher reputation

• The reputation of the publisher can also be a good indicator of the quality and reliability of a secondary source
• Academic presses, professional associations, and well-established commercial publishers are generally considered more reputable than self-published or vanity press books
• Peer-reviewed journals are generally considered more reputable than non-reviewed publications
• Be cautious of sources published by organizations with a clear political or ideological agenda

Date of publication

• The date of publication can affect the relevance and reliability of a secondary source
• Look for the most up-to-date sources available, especially in rapidly changing fields or when dealing with current events
• Be aware that older sources may be outdated or superseded by new research or developments
• However, older sources can still be useful for understanding the historical context or development of a topic

Cited sources and references

• The sources and references cited in a secondary source can provide insight into its reliability and thoroughness
• Look for sources that cite a range of reputable primary and secondary sources to support their arguments
• Be cautious of sources that rely heavily on non-academic or unreliable sources, such as personal blogs or popular media
• Check the citations and references to ensure they are accurate and relevant to the topic at hand

Methodology and data analysis

• The methodology and data analysis used in a secondary source can affect its reliability and validity
• Look for sources that clearly describe their research methods and data sources
• Be cautious of sources that do not provide sufficient detail about their methodology or rely on anecdotal evidence
• Consider whether the methodology is appropriate for the research question and whether the data support the conclusions drawn

Objectivity vs advocacy

• Secondary sources can vary in their level of objectivity and advocacy
• Some sources aim to provide an objective, balanced analysis of a topic, while others are more advocacy-oriented and argue for a particular position
• Both types of sources can be useful, but it is important to be aware of their perspective and potential biases
• Look for sources that are transparent about their perspective and provide evidence to support their arguments
• Consider using a range of sources with different perspectives to get a more complete understanding of a topic

Using secondary sources effectively

• Once researchers have identified and evaluated relevant secondary sources, they must use them effectively in their research
• This involves several key strategies for finding, organizing, and synthesizing information from multiple sources
• Effective use of secondary sources can help researchers develop a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of their topic

Identifying relevant sources

• The first step in using secondary sources effectively is to identify those that are most relevant to the research question or topic at hand
• This may involve searching academic databases, library catalogs, and online search engines using keywords and subject headings
• Researchers should also consult bibliographies and reference lists of relevant sources to identify additional sources
• It can be helpful to start with broad, overview sources and then narrow down to more specific, focused sources as the research progresses

Skimming and scanning techniques

• Given the large volume of potentially relevant secondary sources, researchers must be efficient in their reading and note-taking
• Skimming involves quickly reading through a source to get a general sense of its content and structure
• Scanning involves searching for specific keywords or sections relevant to the research question
• These techniques can help researchers quickly identify the most relevant sources and sections for more in-depth reading

Note-taking strategies

• Effective note-taking is essential for organizing and synthesizing information from multiple secondary sources
• Researchers should develop a consistent system for taking notes, such as using index cards, a notebook, or a digital note-taking app
• Notes should include key information such as the source citation, main arguments, evidence used, and relevant page numbers
• It can be helpful to use a template or outline to ensure consistent note-taking across sources

Synthesizing multiple sources

• Synthesizing involves bringing together information from multiple sources to develop a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of a topic
• This may involve identifying common themes, debates, or gaps across sources
• Researchers should look for ways to organize and categorize information from different sources to identify patterns and connections
• Synthesis can also involve comparing and contrasting different perspectives or arguments to develop a more balanced understanding

Proper citation and attribution

• Proper citation and attribution are essential for avoiding plagiarism and giving credit to the original sources
• Researchers should use a consistent citation style appropriate for their discipline, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago
• Citations should include all necessary information for readers to locate the original source, such as author, title, publication date, and page numbers
• In addition to formal citations, researchers should also provide attribution in the text when paraphrasing or summarizing ideas from a source

Secondary sources in literature reviews

• Literature reviews are a key component of many research projects, and secondary sources play a central role in this process
• A literature review involves summarizing, analyzing, and synthesizing the existing research on a topic to provide context and justification for a new study
• Effective use of secondary sources is essential for conducting a thorough and well-informed literature review

Role in research process

• Literature reviews typically occur at the beginning of a research project, after the research question or problem has been identified
• The purpose of a literature review is to situate the new study within the context of existing research and to demonstrate its significance and originality
• Literature reviews can also help researchers refine their research question, identify appropriate methods and data sources, and anticipate potential challenges or limitations

Identifying gaps in knowledge

• One of the key functions of a literature review is to identify gaps or limitations in the existing research on a topic
• This may involve noting areas where there is limited or conflicting evidence, or where key questions remain unanswered
• Identifying gaps can help researchers demonstrate the need for their study and its potential contribution to the field
• Gaps can also suggest new research questions or hypotheses to be tested in the study

Situating research within larger context

• Literature reviews also help to situate a new study within the larger context of the field or discipline
• This may involve discussing key theories, concepts, or debates that are relevant to the research question
• By situating their research within this larger context, researchers can demonstrate how their study builds on or extends existing knowledge
• This can also help researchers identify potential theoretical or practical implications of their findings

Justifying research questions

• Literature reviews can provide justification for the research question or problem being addressed in a new study
• This may involve demonstrating the significance or urgency of the problem, or the limitations of existing approaches to addressing it
• By grounding the research question in the existing literature, researchers can make a compelling case for why their study is needed and what it can contribute
• Justification can also help researchers make informed decisions about the scope and focus of their study

Comparing methodologies and findings

• Literature reviews can also provide an opportunity to compare and contrast the methodologies and findings of existing studies on a topic
• This may involve discussing the strengths and limitations of different research designs, data sources, or analytical approaches
• Comparing methodologies can help researchers identify best practices or potential pitfalls to avoid in their own study
• Comparing findings can also help researchers identify areas of consensus or debate in the field, and position their own study within these larger conversations