8.2 Techniques of Performance Appraisal

Performance appraisals are crucial for evaluating employee effectiveness and guiding development. Various techniques like graphic rating scales, critical incidents, and 360-degree feedback offer different approaches to assessing performance, each with unique strengths and limitations.

Effective appraisals combine objective and subjective measures, balancing quantifiable data with qualitative assessments. Management by Objectives (MBO) aligns individual goals with organizational objectives, fostering collaboration between managers and employees. Key components include clear standards, ongoing feedback, and strategies to minimize bias.

Performance Appraisal Techniques

Techniques in performance appraisal

Top images from around the web for Techniques in performance appraisal

• 

  Appraisal Methods | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Training and Evaluating Employees | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  360 Degree Feedback Appraisals- An Innovative Approach of Performance Management System ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Appraisal Methods | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Training and Evaluating Employees | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Techniques in performance appraisal

• 

  Appraisal Methods | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Training and Evaluating Employees | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  360 Degree Feedback Appraisals- An Innovative Approach of Performance Management System ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Appraisal Methods | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Training and Evaluating Employees | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Graphic rating scales assess employees on a scale for various traits or characteristics (communication skills, teamwork) providing an easy-to-administer method that may be subjective and prone to rating errors
• Critical incidents focus on specific behaviors or events critical to job performance (handling a customer complaint) offering concrete examples for feedback and development but can be time-consuming to record and document
• Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) combine graphic rating scales and critical incidents using specific behavioral examples (consistently meets project deadlines) to anchor points on a rating scale resulting in a more objective and job-specific approach that requires significant development time
• Forced distribution requires managers to distribute ratings across a predetermined distribution (10% top performers, 80% average, 10% bottom) assuming employee performance follows a normal distribution which can create a competitive environment and demotivate employees
• 360-degree feedback gathers input from multiple sources (supervisors, peers, subordinates, self-appraisal) providing a comprehensive view of employee performance that can be time-consuming and may result in conflicting feedback

Strengths vs weaknesses of appraisal methods

• Objective measures based on quantifiable data (sales figures, production output) are easily measurable and less prone to bias but may not capture all aspects of job performance and can encourage short-term focus
• Subjective measures based on evaluator's judgment and perceptions (communication skills, problem-solving ability) can assess qualitative aspects of performance and adapt to different jobs but are prone to rating errors and biases and may lack consistency across evaluators
• Relative measures compare employees to one another (ranking, forced distribution) identifying top and bottom performers and facilitating talent management decisions but can create a competitive environment demotivating for some employees
• Absolute measures evaluate employees against predetermined standards or objectives (sales targets, project milestones) providing a clear benchmark for performance and facilitating goal-setting and feedback but may not account for situational factors or changes in job requirements

Management by objectives for evaluation

• MBO is a collaborative process where managers and employees:
  1. Set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) objectives (increase sales by 10% in Q3)
  2. Develop action plans to achieve those objectives (attend sales training, expand customer base)
  3. Periodically review progress and make adjustments as needed (monthly check-ins, revise targets based on market changes)
  4. Evaluate performance based on the achievement of objectives (sales increased by 12% in Q3)
• Benefits of using MBO for performance evaluation include aligning individual goals with organizational objectives, encouraging employee participation and commitment, providing a clear basis for performance assessment and feedback, and facilitating communication between managers and employees
• Limitations of using MBO for performance evaluation include requiring significant time and effort to set objectives and monitor progress, potentially overemphasizing quantitative objectives at the expense of qualitative aspects of performance (customer satisfaction), and challenges in setting appropriate objectives for some jobs or roles (creative positions)
• Implementing MBO effectively requires training for managers and employees on the MBO process, regular communication and feedback throughout the performance cycle, flexibility to adjust objectives as circumstances change (budget cuts, market shifts), and integration with other performance management practices (rewards, development opportunities)

Key components of effective performance appraisal

• Performance standards: Clearly defined criteria against which employee performance is measured, ensuring consistency and fairness in evaluations
• Performance feedback: Ongoing communication between managers and employees about job performance, including both positive reinforcement and constructive criticism
• Appraisal interview: A formal meeting between the manager and employee to discuss performance results, set future goals, and address any concerns or questions
• Addressing rater bias: Implementing strategies to minimize subjective judgments and ensure more accurate and fair evaluations