You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

Decision trees form hierarchical structures for classification tasks, recursively partitioning feature space to maximize class label homogeneity. They use measures like and to evaluate splits, balancing interpretability with the risk of .

Random forests enhance decision tree performance by combining multiple trees through and feature randomization. This ensemble approach improves and robustness, though at the cost of some interpretability. Both methods require careful preprocessing and hyperparameter tuning for optimal results.

Decision Tree Algorithms for Classification

Hierarchical Structure and Basic Principles

Top images from around the web for Hierarchical Structure and Basic Principles
Top images from around the web for Hierarchical Structure and Basic Principles
  • Decision trees form hierarchical, tree-like structures for classification tasks
    • Internal nodes represent features
    • Branches represent decision rules
    • nodes represent class labels
  • Recursively partition feature space into subsets maximizing homogeneity of class labels
  • Measure impurity or uncertainty using entropy and Gini impurity
    • Entropy measures disorder in a set of examples
    • Gini impurity quantifies probability of incorrect classification
  • Evaluate feature effectiveness with information gain and gain ratio
    • Information gain calculates reduction in entropy after a split
    • Gain ratio normalizes information gain to avoid bias towards features with many values

Versatility and Hyperparameters

  • Handle both categorical and numerical features
  • Important hyperparameters affect model complexity and overfitting potential
    • Tree depth controls overall structure (shallow vs. deep)
    • Minimum samples for split determines granularity of decisions
  • Advantages include interpretability and handling non-linear relationships
  • Potential for overfitting if not properly regularized
    • Overfitting occurs when model learns noise in training data
    • Regularization techniques () help mitigate overfitting

Building and Interpreting Decision Trees

Construction Algorithms and Splitting Criteria

  • Top-down, greedy approach commonly used (, C4.5, algorithms)
    • ID3 uses information gain for splitting
    • C4.5 improves upon ID3 with gain ratio and handling of continuous attributes
    • CART uses Gini impurity and supports regression trees
  • Splitting criteria determine optimal split at each
    • Gini impurity favors larger partitions
    • Entropy sensitive to differences in class probabilities
    • Misclassification error simple but less sensitive to changes in class probabilities

Pruning Techniques and Interpretation

  • Pre-pruning techniques applied during tree construction
    • Set maximum tree depth (limits overall tree size)
    • Establish minimum number of samples per leaf (controls granularity)
  • Post-pruning methods applied after growing full tree
    • Reduced error pruning removes branches that don't improve validation performance
    • Cost-complexity pruning balances tree size and misclassification rate
  • Interpret trees by analyzing feature importance and decision rules
    • Feature importance quantifies contribution of each feature to predictions
    • Decision rules provide logical explanation of classification process
  • Visualization aids understanding and communication
    • Plot tree structure to show hierarchical decisions
    • Create feature importance plots to highlight influential attributes

Handling Special Cases

  • Address missing values with strategies like surrogate splits
    • Surrogate splits use alternative features when primary split feature is missing
  • Manage continuous features through discretization or binary splits
    • Discretization converts continuous values into categorical bins
    • Binary splits find optimal threshold to split continuous feature

Ensemble Learning: Random Forests

Random Forest Construction and Prediction

  • Combine multiple decision trees to improve classification performance
  • Use bagging (bootstrap aggregating) to create diverse subsets of training data
    • Randomly sample with replacement from original dataset
    • Train individual decision trees on these subsets
  • Implement feature randomization at each split
    • Select random subset of features to consider
    • Increases diversity among trees and reduces correlation
  • Make final predictions through majority voting
    • Each tree in forest casts a vote for the class
    • Class with most votes becomes final prediction

Performance Evaluation and Feature Importance

  • Estimate generalization error with out-of-bag (OOB) error
    • Use samples not included in bootstrap for each tree
    • Provides unbiased estimate without separate validation set
  • Calculate feature importance in random forests
    • Mean decrease in impurity measures reduction in node impurity
    • Permutation importance assesses impact of shuffling feature values
  • Compare to single decision trees
    • Improved accuracy and robustness to overfitting
    • Reduced interpretability and increased computational complexity

Decision Trees and Random Forests in Practice

Data Preprocessing and Model Optimization

  • Preprocess data for decision trees and random forests
    • Handle missing values (imputation or special treatment)
    • Encode categorical variables (one-hot encoding or label encoding)
    • Consider scaling numerical features for certain algorithms
  • Optimize model performance through hyperparameter tuning
    • Use grid search to exhaustively search parameter space
    • Employ random search for efficiency in high-dimensional spaces
    • Implement cross-validation to ensure robust performance estimates

Evaluation Metrics and Comparative Analysis

  • Apply common evaluation metrics for classification tasks
    • Accuracy measures overall correct predictions
    • Precision quantifies true positives among positive predictions
    • Recall calculates proportion of actual positives correctly identified
    • F1-score balances precision and recall
    • AUC-ROC assesses model's ability to distinguish between classes
  • Analyze confusion matrices for detailed performance breakdown
    • Visualize true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives
    • Identify patterns in misclassifications across different classes
  • Compare decision trees and random forests to other algorithms
    • Logistic regression for linear decision boundaries
    • Support vector machines for complex, non-linear separations
    • Evaluate trade-offs in accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency

Advanced Interpretation Techniques

  • Interpret random forest predictions with specialized techniques
    • SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values quantify feature contributions
    • Partial dependence plots show relationship between features and predictions
  • Visualize feature interactions and decision boundaries
    • Create 2D or 3D plots to show how pairs of features influence predictions
    • Generate decision boundary plots to understand model's classification regions
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary