You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

Soft robotics brings a new dimension to , enabling more adaptable and versatile systems. By leveraging and , and grippers can achieve high with reduced complexity, excelling in both and .

Soft robotic hands and grippers offer advantages in safety, adaptability, and dexterity. They can conform to various object shapes, integrate , and employ innovative actuation methods like pneumatics and . Control strategies must account for the unique properties of soft systems to enable precise and efficient manipulation.

Dexterous manipulation fundamentals

  • Dexterous manipulation involves the precise control and manipulation of objects using robotic hands or grippers
  • Soft robotics principles can be applied to create more adaptable and versatile dexterous manipulation systems
  • Understanding the fundamentals of dexterous manipulation is crucial for designing effective soft robotic hands and grippers

Degrees of freedom in manipulation

Top images from around the web for Degrees of freedom in manipulation
Top images from around the web for Degrees of freedom in manipulation
  • Degrees of freedom (DOF) refer to the independent variables that define the configuration of a robotic system
  • In manipulation, DOF determines the range of motion and flexibility of the robotic hand or gripper
    • Higher DOF allows for more complex and diverse manipulation tasks
    • Example: A human hand has 27 DOF, enabling highly dexterous manipulation
  • Soft robotics can leverage compliant materials and underactuated designs to achieve high DOF with reduced complexity

Grasping vs in-hand manipulation

  • Grasping involves the initial acquisition and secure holding of an object
    • Requires sufficient force and stability to maintain a grip on the object
    • Example: Picking up a cup from a table
  • In-hand manipulation refers to the ability to reorient and adjust the object within the hand without releasing it
    • Enables more precise and dexterous manipulation tasks
    • Example: Rotating a pen to change the writing orientation
  • Soft robotic hands can excel at both grasping and in-hand manipulation due to their adaptability and compliance

Soft robotic hands

  • Soft robotic hands are designed to mimic the functionality and versatility of human hands
  • By incorporating soft materials and compliant structures, soft robotic hands can adapt to various object shapes and sizes
  • Soft hands offer several advantages over rigid counterparts, including improved safety, adaptability, and dexterity

Compliant fingers and palms

  • Soft robotic hands often feature compliant fingers and palms made from soft materials (silicone, rubber)
  • Compliance allows the fingers and palm to conform to the shape of the grasped object
    • Enhances the contact area and improves grip stability
    • Reduces the risk of damage to delicate objects
  • Example: A soft robotic hand with compliant fingers can gently grasp a fragile egg without cracking it

Underactuated designs for adaptability

  • Underactuated designs in soft robotic hands refer to having fewer actuators than degrees of freedom
  • By carefully designing the hand's structure and leveraging compliant materials, underactuated hands can adapt to objects passively
    • Reduces the complexity and cost of the actuation system
    • Allows for more robust and flexible grasping
  • Example: The SDM Hand uses a single motor to drive multiple compliant fingers, enabling adaptive grasping

Tactile sensing in soft hands

  • Tactile sensing is crucial for providing feedback during manipulation tasks
  • Soft robotic hands can integrate various tactile sensors (pressure, force, proximity) to detect contact and gather information about the grasped object
    • Enables closed-loop control and improves manipulation precision
    • Soft materials can be embedded with conductive particles or printed with conductive inks to create stretchable sensors
  • Example: A soft robotic hand equipped with pressure sensors can detect the firmness of a fruit and adjust its grip accordingly

Soft grippers

  • are end effectors designed for grasping and manipulating objects using soft materials and actuation principles
  • Unlike traditional rigid grippers, soft grippers can conform to object shapes and handle delicate items without causing damage
  • Soft grippers leverage various actuation methods and materials to achieve adaptable and secure grasping

Pneumatic actuation principles

  • is a common method used in soft grippers
  • Soft pneumatic actuators consist of inflatable chambers or channels that deform when pressurized
    • Positive pressure causes the actuator to expand and conform to the object
    • Negative pressure (vacuum) can be used for suction-based gripping
  • Example: A soft pneumatic gripper with multiple inflatable fingers can grasp objects of various shapes and sizes

Granular jamming for variable stiffness

  • Granular jamming is a technique used in soft grippers to achieve variable stiffness
  • The gripper is filled with granular material (coffee grounds, sand) enclosed in a flexible membrane
    • When the membrane is evacuated (vacuum applied), the granular particles lock together, causing the gripper to stiffen
    • Releasing the vacuum allows the gripper to become soft and pliable again
  • Granular jamming enables the gripper to conform to object shapes in the soft state and maintain a stable grip in the stiff state

Electroadhesion for enhanced gripping

  • is an electrostatic gripping method used in soft grippers
  • By applying a high voltage to conductive electrodes on the gripper's surface, an electrostatic attraction force is generated
    • The electrostatic force allows the gripper to adhere to various materials, including low-friction surfaces
    • The gripping force can be controlled by adjusting the applied voltage
  • Example: An electroadhesive soft gripper can pick up flat objects (sheets of paper, circuit boards) without requiring precise alignment

Control strategies for dexterous manipulation

  • Controlling soft robotic hands and grippers for dexterous manipulation tasks requires advanced control strategies
  • Different approaches, such as model-based and learning-based methods, can be employed depending on the system and task requirements
  • Control strategies must consider the compliance and nonlinear behavior of soft robotic systems

Model-based vs learning-based approaches

  • relies on accurate mathematical models of the soft robotic system
    • Requires precise knowledge of the system's kinematics, dynamics, and material properties
    • Can be challenging to develop accurate models for highly deformable and nonlinear soft structures
  • leverages machine learning algorithms to learn the system's behavior from data
    • Can adapt to complex and uncertain environments without explicit modeling
    • Requires sufficient training data and may have limited generalization capabilities
  • Hybrid approaches combining model-based and learning-based methods can offer the benefits of both

Hybrid position/force control

  • is a control strategy that decouples position and force control loops
  • The position control loop regulates the motion and trajectory of the soft robotic hand or gripper
    • Ensures accurate positioning and tracking of the desired motion
    • Can be implemented using feedback from encoders or visual sensors
  • The force control loop regulates the interaction forces between the hand/gripper and the environment
    • Maintains a desired contact force or adapts to external forces
    • Requires force sensors or estimation techniques
  • Hybrid position/force control enables precise manipulation while accommodating external disturbances and contact forces

Impedance control for compliance

  • is a control strategy that regulates the dynamic relationship between motion and force
  • By adjusting the impedance parameters (stiffness, damping, inertia), the soft robotic hand or gripper can exhibit different levels of compliance
    • Low impedance allows for compliant and adaptable behavior
    • High impedance results in stiff and precise motion
  • Impedance control is particularly suitable for soft robotics due to the inherent compliance of soft materials
    • Enables safe interaction with the environment and adaptation to external forces
    • Can be implemented using force feedback or by exploiting the natural compliance of soft structures

Applications of soft dexterous manipulation

  • Soft dexterous manipulation has numerous applications across various domains
  • The adaptability, safety, and versatility of soft robotic hands and grippers make them suitable for tasks involving delicate objects, unstructured environments, and human-robot interaction
  • Some key application areas include manufacturing, healthcare, and service robotics

Handling delicate objects

  • Soft robotic hands and grippers are well-suited for handling delicate and fragile objects
    • The compliant nature of soft materials allows for gentle and conformable grasping
    • Reduces the risk of damage to the object during manipulation
  • Example applications:
    • Handling delicate food products (fruits, vegetables) in agricultural and food processing industries
    • Manipulating biological samples or tissues in laboratory automation and medical research

Unstructured pick-and-place tasks

  • Soft dexterous manipulation is advantageous for pick-and-place tasks in unstructured environments
    • Soft grippers can adapt to variations in object shapes, sizes, and orientations
    • Enables robust grasping and manipulation without precise object localization or alignment
  • Example applications:
    • Bin picking in manufacturing and logistics, where objects may be randomly arranged
    • Sorting and packaging tasks in e-commerce fulfillment centers

Human-robot collaboration scenarios

  • Soft robotic hands and grippers are inherently safer for human-robot interaction due to their compliance and low inertia
    • Reduces the risk of injury in case of accidental collisions or contact with humans
    • Enables collaborative tasks where humans and robots work in close proximity
  • Example applications:
    • Collaborative assembly tasks in manufacturing, where humans and robots share the same workspace
    • Assistive robotics in healthcare, such as robotic aids for individuals with limited mobility or dexterity

Challenges and future directions

  • Despite the advancements in soft dexterous manipulation, several challenges and opportunities for future research exist
  • Addressing these challenges will further enhance the capabilities and applicability of soft robotic hands and grippers
  • Some key areas for future exploration include improving dexterity, integrating multi-modal sensing, and scaling up to complex tasks

Improving dexterity and precision

  • Enhancing the dexterity and precision of soft robotic hands and grippers is an ongoing challenge
    • Requires advancements in actuation technologies, such as miniaturized and high-bandwidth actuators
    • Improved sensing and control strategies are needed to achieve fine-grained manipulation capabilities
  • Potential research directions:
    • Developing novel soft actuators with higher force output and faster response times
    • Investigating advanced control algorithms that can handle the nonlinear and time-varying behavior of soft systems

Integrating multi-modal sensing

  • Integrating multiple sensing modalities can provide a richer understanding of the manipulation task and environment
    • Tactile sensing provides information about contact forces, textures, and object properties
    • Vision sensing enables object recognition, localization, and tracking
    • Proprioceptive sensing (joint angles, positions) is essential for precise control and coordination
  • Challenges and opportunities:
    • Developing soft and stretchable sensors that can be seamlessly integrated into soft structures
    • Fusing multi-modal sensory data to obtain a coherent and robust perception of the manipulation scene
    • Investigating learning-based methods for sensor fusion and interpretation

Scaling up to complex real-world tasks

  • Scaling soft dexterous manipulation systems to handle complex real-world tasks remains a significant challenge
    • Real-world environments are often unstructured, dynamic, and unpredictable
    • Complex tasks may require a combination of grasping, manipulation, and dexterous operations
  • Future research directions:
    • Developing modular and reconfigurable soft robotic systems that can adapt to various task requirements
    • Investigating learning-based approaches (reinforcement learning, imitation learning) to acquire complex manipulation skills
    • Integrating soft dexterous manipulation with higher-level planning and reasoning capabilities for autonomous operation
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary