8.5 Grasping and manipulation strategies

Soft robotic grippers use various grasping strategies to securely hold and manipulate objects. These strategies leverage the grippers' compliance and adaptability, allowing them to conform to different shapes and handle uncertainties. Understanding these approaches is crucial for designing effective soft robotic systems.

Grasping force analysis and manipulation planning are key aspects of soft robotic manipulation. By analyzing contact points, grasp wrench space, and stability metrics, researchers can optimize gripper performance. Manipulation planning techniques like regrasping and in-hand manipulation exploit soft grippers' unique capabilities for complex object handling.

Types of grasping strategies

• Grasping strategies in soft robotics involve selecting appropriate grasp types based on object properties and task requirements
• Different grasping strategies leverage the compliance and adaptability of soft robotic grippers to securely hold and manipulate objects

Form vs force closure grasps

Top images from around the web for Form vs force closure grasps

• 

  Frontiers | Control Modification of Grasp Force Covaries Agency and Performance on Rigid and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Exploiting Robot Hand Compliance and Environmental Constraints for Edge Grasps View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Employing Pneumatic, Telescopic Actuators for the Development of Soft and Hybrid ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Control Modification of Grasp Force Covaries Agency and Performance on Rigid and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Exploiting Robot Hand Compliance and Environmental Constraints for Edge Grasps View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Form vs force closure grasps

• 

  Frontiers | Control Modification of Grasp Force Covaries Agency and Performance on Rigid and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Exploiting Robot Hand Compliance and Environmental Constraints for Edge Grasps View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Employing Pneumatic, Telescopic Actuators for the Development of Soft and Hybrid ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Control Modification of Grasp Force Covaries Agency and Performance on Rigid and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Exploiting Robot Hand Compliance and Environmental Constraints for Edge Grasps View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Form closure grasps rely on the geometry of the gripper and object to constrain the object's motion (enveloping grasps)
• Force closure grasps achieve stability through friction forces at contact points (pinch grasps)
• Form closure is more robust to external disturbances, while force closure allows for more dexterous manipulation

Power vs precision grasps

• Power grasps involve large contact areas between the gripper and object, providing high stability (whole-hand grasps)
• Precision grasps use fingertip contacts for fine motor control and dexterous manipulation (tripod grasps)
• Soft robotic grippers can adapt their configuration to switch between power and precision grasps

Adaptive grasping techniques

• Adaptive grasping leverages the compliance of soft grippers to conform to object shapes and handle uncertainties
• Underactuated soft grippers passively adapt to object geometry, simplifying control and increasing robustness
• Sensor-based adaptive grasping uses tactile feedback to adjust grasp forces and maintain stable grasps

Grasping force analysis

• Analyzing grasping forces is crucial for ensuring stable and secure grasps in soft robotic applications
• Grasping force analysis involves determining contact points, evaluating grasp wrench space, and assessing grasp stability metrics

Contact point determination

• Contact point determination identifies the locations where the gripper makes contact with the object
• Optimal contact point selection maximizes grasp stability and minimizes internal forces
• Soft gripper compliance allows for conforming to object shapes and achieving favorable contact distributions

Grasp wrench space

• Grasp wrench space represents the set of external forces and torques that a grasp can resist
• Constructing the grasp wrench space requires knowledge of contact locations, friction coefficients, and gripper kinematics
• A larger grasp wrench space indicates higher grasp stability and robustness to external disturbances

Grasp stability metrics

• Grasp stability metrics quantify the quality and robustness of a grasp
• Common metrics include the grasp wrench space volume, minimum singular value, and grasp isotropy
• Soft grippers' adaptability and compliance can enhance grasp stability by distributing forces and accommodating object variations

Manipulation planning

• Manipulation planning involves generating trajectories and grasp sequences to achieve desired object transformations
• Soft robotic grippers' compliance and dexterity enable diverse manipulation strategies

Regrasp planning

• Regrasp planning determines intermediate grasp configurations to reposition the object within the gripper
• Regrasp sequences allow for overcoming limitations of the initial grasp and achieving complex object reorientations
• Soft grippers' adaptability facilitates smooth transitions between grasp configurations during regrasp operations

In-hand manipulation

• In-hand manipulation involves controlled object motions within the gripper without releasing the object
• Soft grippers' compliance allows for precise control of grasping forces and accommodating object dynamics during in-hand manipulation
• Examples of in-hand manipulation include rolling, sliding, and finger gaiting

Finger gaiting techniques

• Finger gaiting involves repositioning individual fingers of the gripper to maintain stable grasps during manipulation
• Gaiting techniques leverage the independent actuation and compliance of soft gripper fingers
• Finger gaiting enables dexterous manipulation tasks such as object reorientation and handling of irregular shapes

Soft gripper designs

• Soft gripper designs exploit the properties of compliant materials and adaptive mechanisms for grasping and manipulation
• Key design principles include pneumatic actuation, underactuation, and bioinspiration

Pneumatic actuators for grasping

• Pneumatic actuators, such as soft pneumatic networks (PneuNets), enable compliant and adaptive grasping
• Pressurized air chambers within the soft gripper deform and conform to object shapes upon inflation
• Pneumatic actuation provides inherent compliance, simplifies control, and allows for lightweight and flexible gripper designs

Underactuated compliant mechanisms

• Underactuated soft grippers have fewer actuators than degrees of freedom, relying on compliant mechanisms for passive adaptation
• Compliant joints and elastic elements enable the gripper to automatically conform to object geometry
• Underactuation simplifies control, reduces gripper complexity, and enhances robustness to uncertainties

Bioinspired gripping principles

• Bioinspired soft grippers mimic the adaptability and dexterity of biological appendages (elephant trunks, octopus arms)
• Bioinspired designs incorporate soft materials, distributed compliance, and multi-segment structures
• Examples include suction-based octopus-inspired grippers and tendon-driven anthropomorphic hands

Tactile sensing for grasping

• Tactile sensing provides valuable feedback for grasping control, slip detection, and object recognition
• Integrating tactile sensors into soft grippers enhances their perceptual capabilities and grasping performance

Tactile sensor technologies

• Various tactile sensor technologies are employed in soft robotics, including resistive, capacitive, and optical sensors
• Soft tactile sensors can be embedded within the gripper's compliant structure or surface
• Stretchable and flexible tactile sensor arrays enable high-resolution contact force and pressure measurements

Slip detection and prevention

• Tactile sensing allows for detecting and preventing object slip during grasping and manipulation
• Slip detection algorithms analyze temporal changes in tactile signals to identify incipient slip events
• Closed-loop control strategies adjust grasping forces based on slip feedback to maintain stable grasps

Texture recognition for grasping

• Tactile sensing enables texture recognition, which can inform grasp planning and object identification
• Texture information is extracted from tactile signals using machine learning techniques (convolutional neural networks)
• Recognizing object textures helps in selecting appropriate grasp strategies and adapting to surface properties

Grasping control strategies

• Grasping control strategies aim to regulate grasping forces, ensure stable grasps, and adapt to object properties
• Soft robotics grasping control leverages the inherent compliance and adaptability of soft grippers

Impedance control for compliance

• Impedance control regulates the dynamic relationship between the gripper's motion and the contact forces
• By adjusting the gripper's stiffness and damping, impedance control enables compliant interaction with objects
• Soft grippers' inherent compliance simplifies the implementation of impedance control strategies

Hybrid position/force control

• Hybrid position/force control decouples the control of gripper position and grasping forces
• Position control is used for free-space motion, while force control is employed during object contact
• Soft grippers' compliance allows for smooth transitions between position and force control modes

Learning-based grasping controllers

• Learning-based approaches, such as reinforcement learning and imitation learning, enable adaptive grasping control
• Data-driven methods learn optimal grasping policies from demonstrations or through trial-and-error interactions
• Soft grippers' adaptability and compliance provide a favorable platform for learning-based grasping control

Dexterous manipulation primitives

• Dexterous manipulation primitives are fundamental building blocks for complex object manipulation tasks
• Soft robotic grippers' compliance and multi-segment designs enable diverse manipulation primitives

Finger pivoting and rolling

• Finger pivoting involves rotating an object by pivoting it against a stationary finger or surface
• Rolling manipulation translates an object by coordinating the motion of individual gripper fingers
• Soft grippers' compliant fingers facilitate precise control of pivoting and rolling primitives

Controlled slip manipulation

• Controlled slip manipulation leverages intentional slippage between the gripper and object for dexterous manipulation
• By regulating grasping forces and friction, controlled slip enables object reorientation and fine positioning
• Soft grippers' adaptability allows for maintaining stable grasps while permitting controlled slip

In-hand object reorientation

• In-hand object reorientation involves changing an object's pose within the gripper without releasing it
• Reorientation primitives include finger gaiting, controlled slip, and coordinated finger motions
• Soft grippers' dexterity and compliance enable smooth and precise in-hand object reorientation

Benchmarking and performance metrics

• Benchmarking and performance metrics are essential for evaluating and comparing soft robotic grasping systems
• Standardized metrics and benchmarks enable objective assessment of grasping capabilities and inform system design

Grasping success rates

• Grasping success rates measure the reliability and robustness of a grasping system
• Success rates are determined by the percentage of successful grasps across a range of objects and scenarios
• Soft grippers' adaptability and compliance often lead to higher success rates compared to rigid grippers

Robustness to object variability

• Robustness to object variability assesses a grasping system's ability to handle diverse object shapes, sizes, and materials
• Benchmarking involves testing grasps on a wide range of objects with varying properties
• Soft grippers' compliance and conformability enhance their robustness to object variability

Manipulation task complexity measures

• Manipulation task complexity measures quantify the difficulty and dexterity required for specific manipulation tasks
• Complexity metrics consider factors such as the number of manipulation steps, object reorientation angles, and precision requirements
• Soft grippers' dexterity and adaptability enable them to perform complex manipulation tasks with increased ease and efficiency