8.3 Impact fees

Impact fees are one-time charges local governments impose on new developments to offset public service costs. They ensure new growth pays its fair share, mitigating fiscal burdens on existing residents and promoting efficient land use patterns.

These fees must comply with legal frameworks and are calculated using various methods. While they generate revenue and manage growth, impact fees can affect housing affordability and development patterns. Alternatives and future trends continue to shape their implementation in urban fiscal policy.

Definition of impact fees

• One-time charges imposed by local governments on new development projects
• Designed to offset the cost of providing public services and infrastructure to support new growth
• Integral part of urban fiscal policy used to manage the financial impacts of urban expansion

Purpose and objectives

• Ensure new development pays its fair share of infrastructure costs
• Mitigate the fiscal burden on existing residents and businesses
• Promote more efficient land use patterns and sustainable urban growth

Legal framework

Constitutional considerations

Top images from around the web for Constitutional considerations

• 

  Fifth Amendment - Free of Charge Creative Commons Keyboard image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Amending or Changing the Contract | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Fifth Amendment - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Fifth Amendment - Free of Charge Creative Commons Keyboard image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Amending or Changing the Contract | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Constitutional considerations

• 

  Fifth Amendment - Free of Charge Creative Commons Keyboard image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Amending or Changing the Contract | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Fifth Amendment - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Fifth Amendment - Free of Charge Creative Commons Keyboard image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Amending or Changing the Contract | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Must comply with the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause
• Required to demonstrate a rational nexus between the fee and the impact of development
• Fees must be roughly proportional to the projected impact of the new development

State-level legislation

• Varies widely across states, with some having specific impact fee enabling acts
• Defines permissible uses of impact fees and establishes procedural requirements
• May set limits on fee amounts or specify eligible infrastructure categories

Types of impact fees

Transportation impact fees

• Fund road improvements, traffic signals, and public transit infrastructure
• Often calculated based on trip generation rates and traffic impact studies
• May vary by land use type (residential, commercial, industrial)

School impact fees

• Support construction or expansion of public schools to accommodate new students
• Typically applied to residential developments
• Calculation often based on projected student generation rates

Parks and recreation fees

• Finance acquisition and development of new parks, open spaces, and recreational facilities
• May be based on a per-capita standard for park acreage or facilities
• Can vary depending on the type and density of development

Utility impact fees

• Cover costs of expanding water, sewer, and stormwater management systems
• Often calculated based on projected demand or system capacity requirements
• May include separate fees for water treatment, distribution, and storage

Calculation methods

Rational nexus test

• Establishes a reasonable connection between the impact fee and the development's impact
• Requires demonstrating that the fee is used to benefit the development paying it
• Ensures fees are not arbitrary or excessive

Proportionality principle

• Mandates that the fee amount is roughly proportional to the impact of the development
• Requires careful analysis of infrastructure costs and development impacts
• Helps prevent overcharging or discriminatory fee structures

Fee assessment techniques

• Include cost recovery method (allocating existing infrastructure costs)
• Incremental expansion method (estimating future infrastructure needs)
• Plan-based method (using adopted capital improvement plans)
• Service standard method (maintaining existing levels of service)

Implementation process

Impact fee studies

• Comprehensive analyses of infrastructure needs, costs, and development impacts
• Often conducted by specialized consultants or city planning departments
• Include demographic projections, land use forecasts, and infrastructure assessments

Public hearings

• Provide opportunities for stakeholder input and community feedback
• Allow developers, residents, and other interested parties to voice concerns
• Help build consensus and refine fee structures before adoption

Adoption procedures

• Typically require formal approval by city council or county commission
• May involve multiple readings of ordinances and public comment periods
• Often include provisions for periodic review and updates of fee schedules

Economic effects

Housing affordability

• Can increase the cost of new housing, potentially affecting affordability
• May be partially or fully passed on to homebuyers or renters
• Can incentivize smaller, more affordable housing units to reduce fee impacts

Development patterns

• May encourage higher-density development to spread fee costs over more units
• Can influence the location of new development based on fee differentials
• May promote infill development in areas with existing infrastructure

Local government revenue

• Provides a significant source of funding for infrastructure improvements
• Reduces reliance on general fund revenues or debt financing for growth-related costs
• Can stabilize local government finances in rapidly growing areas

Advantages of impact fees

Revenue generation

• Create a dedicated funding source for growth-related infrastructure needs
• Allow local governments to keep pace with rapid development
• Can be adjusted to reflect changing costs and development patterns

Growth management tool

• Encourage more efficient use of existing infrastructure
• Discourage sprawl by making greenfield development more expensive
• Help align development with comprehensive planning goals

Equitable cost distribution

• Shift infrastructure costs from existing residents to new development
• Ensure that those benefiting from new infrastructure contribute to its cost
• Can reduce opposition to new development by addressing fiscal concerns

Criticisms and challenges

Potential for overcharging

• Risk of fees exceeding the actual impact of development
• Challenges in accurately forecasting long-term infrastructure needs
• Potential for double taxation if fees overlap with other funding mechanisms

Administrative complexity

• Require ongoing studies and updates to maintain legal compliance
• Can be difficult to track and allocate funds appropriately
• May create administrative burdens for both local governments and developers

Economic distortions

• May discourage development in certain areas or for certain types of projects
• Can potentially shift development to neighboring jurisdictions with lower fees
• May disproportionately affect smaller developers or affordable housing projects

Alternatives to impact fees

Special assessment districts

• Allow for targeted infrastructure funding within specific geographic areas
• Can be used for both new development and existing neighborhoods
• Often involve property owner approval and ongoing assessments

Development agreements

• Negotiated contracts between developers and local governments
• Can include customized infrastructure contributions or in-kind improvements
• Allow for more flexibility in addressing specific project impacts

Exactions

• Required dedications of land or facilities as a condition of development approval
• Can include on-site improvements or off-site contributions
• May be more suitable for addressing localized impacts

Case studies

Notable impact fee programs

• Albuquerque, New Mexico's comprehensive impact fee system
• Florida's statewide impact fee enabling legislation
• California's school impact fee program

Legal precedents

• Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) established the rational nexus test
• Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) refined the proportionality requirement
• Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District (2013) extended takings analysis to monetary exactions

Future trends

Smart growth policies

• Integration of impact fees with transit-oriented development incentives
• Use of fee reductions to promote infill and brownfield redevelopment
• Incorporation of walkability and mixed-use development criteria in fee structures

Sustainability considerations

• Inclusion of green infrastructure and low-impact development in fee calculations
• Incentives for energy-efficient and water-conserving development through fee reductions
• Adaptation of fee structures to address climate change resilience needs

Technological advancements

• Use of GIS and big data analytics to improve impact forecasting and fee calculations
• Implementation of online fee calculators and payment systems for developers
• Integration of impact fee management with smart city infrastructure planning tools