8.1 Indian Land Tenure and the General Allotment Act

Indian land tenure is a complex system shaped by treaties, policies, and cultural practices. The General Allotment Act of 1887 divided tribal lands into individual allotments, leading to massive land loss and fragmentation.

This policy created a patchwork of ownership, complicating land management and economic development. Fractionation and checkerboarding continue to pose challenges for tribes seeking to consolidate land and exercise sovereignty over their territories.

Indian Land Tenure and Allotment

Historical Context and Policies

Top images from around the web for Historical Context and Policies

• 

  Indian removal - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Allotment Era and Resistance in the Native West | US History II (American Yawp) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indian Territory - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indian removal - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Allotment Era and Resistance in the Native West | US History II (American Yawp) View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Historical Context and Policies

• 

  Indian removal - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Allotment Era and Resistance in the Native West | US History II (American Yawp) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indian Territory - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indian removal - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Allotment Era and Resistance in the Native West | US History II (American Yawp) View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Indian Land Tenure refers to the complex system of land ownership and rights among Native American tribes, influenced by historical treaties, federal policies, and cultural practices
• General Allotment Act (Dawes Act) of 1887 aimed to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American society by dividing tribal lands into individual allotments (typically 40 to 160 acres per person)
• Allotment process under the Dawes Act resulted in the loss of nearly 90 million acres of tribal land between 1887 and 1934, as surplus land was often sold to non-Native buyers
• Fee Simple ownership granted to Native American allottees after a 25-year trust period, allowing them to sell, lease, or mortgage their land without federal oversight, often leading to further land loss

Land Designations and Implications

• Trust Land refers to allotted lands held in trust by the federal government for individual Native Americans or tribes, with restrictions on alienation and encumbrance
• Reservation lands set aside by the federal government for the use and occupation of specific Native American tribes, with varying levels of tribal sovereignty and jurisdiction
• Allotment policy fragmented reservations into a patchwork of individual and tribal land holdings, complicating land management and economic development efforts

Land Ownership and Fractionation

Inheritance and Fractionation

• Fractionation occurs when allotted lands are divided among multiple heirs over generations, resulting in increasingly small, undivided interests in a single parcel of land
• Heirship land, or allotments that have passed to multiple heirs, can have hundreds or even thousands of co-owners, making it difficult to obtain consensus for land use decisions or to locate all owners
• Checkerboarding of land ownership within reservations, with alternating parcels of trust land, fee simple land, and non-Native owned land, creates jurisdictional challenges and hinders comprehensive land management

Land Classifications and Management

• Individual Indian Land refers to allotted trust land held by individual Native Americans or their heirs, subject to federal oversight and restrictions on alienation
• Tribal Land is held in trust by the federal government for the benefit of a tribe as a whole, with the tribal government exercising jurisdiction and management authority
• Fractionation and checkerboarding of land ownership complicate efforts to consolidate land holdings, pursue economic development opportunities, or implement comprehensive land use plans

Land Consolidation Efforts

Indian Reorganization Act and its Impact

• Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (IRA) aimed to reverse the allotment policy and restore tribal sovereignty, by allowing tribes to organize governments, establish tribal constitutions, and consolidate land holdings
• IRA authorized the Secretary of the Interior to acquire land in trust for tribes, either through purchase or exchange, to help rebuild the tribal land base eroded by allotment
• Tribes that adopted the IRA were able to create tribal corporations, manage their own resources, and engage in economic development activities on consolidated tribal land holdings

Contemporary Land Consolidation Programs

• Land Consolidation efforts, such as the Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations (part of the Cobell v. Salazar settlement), aim to purchase fractionated interests from willing sellers and transfer consolidated parcels to tribal ownership
• Tribal land consolidation plans and initiatives focus on reacquiring allotted or fee simple lands within reservation boundaries to restore tribal land bases and streamline land management
• Consolidating fractionated and checkerboarded land holdings enables tribes to pursue comprehensive land use planning, natural resource management, and economic development opportunities on contiguous parcels of tribal land