You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides8.3 Mineral Rights and Energy Development on Indian Lands
6 min read•august 12, 2024
Mineral rights and energy development on Indian lands involve complex legal and economic issues. Tribes navigate federal laws, sovereignty concerns, and environmental impacts while seeking to benefit from their natural resources. These challenges highlight the ongoing struggle for tribal self-determination in resource management.
Balancing economic opportunities with environmental protection is key. Tribes must weigh the potential benefits of mineral leasing and energy projects against impacts on their lands and cultural resources. This tension reflects broader issues of and federal in Indian country.
Mineral Leasing and Development Acts
Key Legislation Governing Mineral Leasing and Development on Indian Lands
Top images from around the web for Key Legislation Governing Mineral Leasing and Development on Indian Lands
Our Living History — Indigenous History View original
Is this image relevant?
By the Book | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Our Living History — Indigenous History View original
Is this image relevant?
By the Book | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Key Legislation Governing Mineral Leasing and Development on Indian Lands
Our Living History — Indigenous History View original
Is this image relevant?
By the Book | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Our Living History — Indigenous History View original
Is this image relevant?
By the Book | UCT News View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- of 1938 allows tribes to lease their lands for mining purposes, subject to approval by the Secretary of the Interior
- Applies to lands held in trust by the United States for Indian tribes and individual Indian allottees
- Leases can be for terms of up to 10 years and as long thereafter as minerals are produced in paying quantities
- of 1982 provides tribes with greater control and flexibility in the development of their mineral resources
- Allows tribes to enter into joint ventures, production sharing, and other agreements for mineral development
- Agreements must be approved by the Secretary of the Interior, who must determine that they are in the best interest of the tribe
- of 2007 includes provisions to promote energy development on Indian lands
- Establishes a Department of Energy Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs to provide technical assistance, grants, and loan guarantees for energy development on Indian lands
- Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to enter into (TERAs) with Indian tribes
Tribal Energy Resource Agreements (TERAs) and the BIA Approval Process
- Tribal energy resource agreements (TERAs) allow tribes to enter into leases, business agreements, and rights-of-way for energy development on tribal lands without Secretary of the Interior approval for each individual agreement
- TERAs must be approved by the Secretary of the Interior and include provisions related to environmental review, public participation, and tribal oversight
- Once a TERA is approved, the tribe can enter into energy-related agreements without further Secretary approval, provided they comply with the terms of the TERA
- (BIA) approval process for mineral leases and agreements on Indian lands can be lengthy and complex
- BIA must review and approve all mineral leases and agreements to ensure they comply with applicable laws and regulations and are in the best interest of the tribe
- BIA approval process has been criticized as a barrier to energy development on Indian lands, prompting efforts to streamline the process through TERAs and other reforms
Tribal Sovereignty and Trust Responsibility
Tribal Sovereignty and the Federal Trust Responsibility
- Tribal sovereignty refers to the inherent right of Indian tribes to govern themselves and their lands
- Tribes are recognized as domestic dependent nations with inherent powers of self-government
- Tribal sovereignty is subject to limitation by Congress, but tribes retain significant authority over their internal affairs and lands
- Trust responsibility is the legal obligation of the United States to protect tribal lands, assets, and resources and to carry out the mandates of federal law with respect to American Indian and Alaska Native tribes
- Arises from treaties, statutes, and the historical relationship between the federal government and tribes
- Requires the federal government to act in the best interests of tribes and to consult with them on actions that may affect their lands and resources
Consultation Requirements and Sacred Site Protection
- Consultation requirements mandate that federal agencies consult with tribes on actions that may affect their lands, resources, or sacred sites
- requires agencies to have an accountable process for meaningful and timely consultation with tribes in the development of policies that have tribal implications
- (NHPA) requires consultation with tribes on federal undertakings that may affect properties of cultural or religious significance to them
- Sacred site protection laws and policies aim to preserve and protect sites that are sacred to tribes
- requires agencies to accommodate access to and ceremonial use of sacred sites by religious practitioners and to avoid adversely affecting the physical integrity of such sites
- (AIRFA) protects the rights of Native Americans to exercise their traditional religions and access sacred sites
Royalties and Revenue Sharing
Subsurface Rights and Royalties from Mineral Development
- refer to the ownership and control of minerals beneath the surface of the land
- On Indian trust lands, the tribe or individual Indian allottee owns the subsurface rights, subject to federal oversight and approval of mineral leases and agreements
- Mineral leases and agreements on Indian lands typically provide for the payment of to the tribe or allottee based on the value or volume of minerals produced
- Royalties are payments made by the mineral lessee or operator to the owner of the mineral rights (the tribe or allottee) in exchange for the right to extract and sell the minerals
- Royalty rates for mineral leases on Indian lands are set by the Secretary of the Interior and are typically based on a percentage of the value of the minerals produced
- Royalties from mineral development on Indian lands can provide significant revenue for tribes and individual Indian mineral owners
Revenue Sharing from Mineral Development on Indian Lands
- refers to the distribution of revenues from mineral development on Indian lands among the tribe, individual Indian mineral owners, and the federal government
- Indian Mineral Leasing Act and Indian Mineral Development Act provide for the sharing of revenues from mineral leases and agreements on Indian lands
- Typically, the tribe or individual Indian mineral owner receives the majority of the revenue, with a smaller share going to the federal government to cover administrative costs and other expenses
- Revenue sharing arrangements can vary depending on the specific terms of the mineral lease or agreement and the applicable laws and regulations
- Some tribes have negotiated more favorable revenue sharing terms through Indian Mineral Development Act agreements or other arrangements
- Revenue from mineral development can be an important source of funding for tribal governments and services, but also raises questions about the environmental and social impacts of development
Environmental Considerations and Energy Projects
Environmental Impact Assessments for Energy Projects on Indian Lands
- Environmental impact assessments are required for many energy projects on Indian lands to evaluate potential environmental and cultural impacts
- (NEPA) requires federal agencies to prepare an (EIS) for major federal actions significantly affecting the environment, including approval of mineral leases and agreements on Indian lands
- EIS process involves public notice and comment, consultation with tribes and other stakeholders, and analysis of alternatives and mitigation measures
- Environmental impact assessments can be a significant hurdle for energy development on Indian lands, particularly for projects with potentially significant impacts
- Tribes and environmental organizations have used NEPA and other laws to challenge energy projects on Indian lands, citing concerns about air and water pollution, climate change, and impacts on sacred sites and cultural resources
- Balancing the need for economic development with the protection of environmental and cultural resources is a major challenge for tribes and federal agencies in the energy development process
Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking) and Renewable Energy Projects on Indian Lands
- (fracking) is a controversial oil and gas extraction technique that has been used on some Indian lands
- Fracking involves injecting a high-pressure mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into rock formations to fracture the rock and release trapped oil and gas
- Fracking has been associated with a range of environmental and health concerns, including water contamination, air pollution, and induced seismic activity
- Some tribes have banned or restricted fracking on their lands, while others have pursued it as an economic development opportunity
- , such as wind and solar power, have also been developed on some Indian lands
- Tribes have pursued renewable energy projects as a way to generate revenue, create jobs, and reduce their dependence on fossil fuels
- Renewable energy projects on Indian lands have faced challenges related to transmission infrastructure, financing, and cultural resource protection
- Some tribes have partnered with private companies or other tribes to develop renewable energy projects, while others have pursued them independently with support from federal agencies and grants
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
