8.3 Modernist Architecture and Urban Planning in Turkey

Turkey's modernist architecture and urban planning in the early to mid-20th century reflected the nation's push for a Western-oriented identity. Influenced by functionalism and simplicity, architects like Sedad Hakkı Eldem blended modernist principles with traditional Turkish elements.

The movement shaped cities through rational layouts, zoning, and car-centric design. While providing improved living conditions for some, modernist planning faced criticism for neglecting cultural heritage and creating social inequalities. This tension highlighted the challenges of balancing modernization with local traditions.

Modernist Principles in Turkish Architecture

Influence of Modernist Principles

Top images from around the web for Influence of Modernist Principles

• 

  Escuela de la Bauhaus - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  From Modernism to Today: Reading Urban Planning Approaches to the Turkish Capital Ankara ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The “Haus der Freundschaft” (House of Friendship): a Megaform in Istanbul by Hans Poelzig (1916 ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Escuela de la Bauhaus - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  From Modernism to Today: Reading Urban Planning Approaches to the Turkish Capital Ankara ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Influence of Modernist Principles

• 

  Escuela de la Bauhaus - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  From Modernism to Today: Reading Urban Planning Approaches to the Turkish Capital Ankara ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The “Haus der Freundschaft” (House of Friendship): a Megaform in Istanbul by Hans Poelzig (1916 ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Escuela de la Bauhaus - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  From Modernism to Today: Reading Urban Planning Approaches to the Turkish Capital Ankara ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Modernist principles significantly influenced Turkish architecture and urban planning in the early to mid-20th century
  • Principles included functionalism, simplicity, and the use of new materials and technologies (reinforced concrete, flat roofs, simple geometric forms)
  • Driven by a desire to create a modern, secular, and Western-oriented nation-state following the establishment of the Republic of Turkey (1923)
• Modernist architecture in Turkey eliminated ornamental elements
• Influence of modernist principles varied across the country based on local conditions, cultural traditions, and individual preferences of architects and planners

Modernist Urban Planning

• Emphasized the creation of rational, efficient, and hygienic cities
  • Utilized zoning, grid layouts, and the separation of residential, commercial, and industrial areas
  • Aimed to improve living conditions and well-being of the population
  • Led to changes in land use patterns and the spatial organization of urban life
• Prioritized automobile-oriented transportation with the construction of wide boulevards and highways
  • Often prioritized the needs of car owners over pedestrians and public transportation users

Key Architects of Modern Turkish Cities

Sedad Hakkı Eldem (1908-1988)

• Prominent Turkish architect known for his synthesis of modernist principles with traditional Turkish architectural elements
  • Exemplified in his design for the Faculty of Science and Letters at Istanbul University (1944)
  • Combined modernist simplicity with references to Anatolian architectural traditions
• Contributed to the modernization of Turkish cities through his innovative designs

Emin Onat (1908-1961) and Orhan Arda (1911-2013)

• Collaborated on the design of the Anıtkabir, the mausoleum of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
  • Combined modernist simplicity with monumental scale
  • Incorporated references to Anatolian architectural traditions
• Played a significant role in shaping the architectural landscape of Ankara, the capital city of Turkey

Clemens Holzmeister (1886-1983)

• Austrian architect who designed several important public buildings in Ankara
  • Designed the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (1938-1963)
  • Exemplified the modernist principles of functionality and simplicity
• Contributed to the modernization of Ankara and the establishment of its identity as the capital city

Bruno Taut (1880-1938)

• German architect who fled Nazi Germany and worked in Turkey from 1936 to 1938
  • Designed several educational buildings, including the Faculty of Language, History, and Geography at Ankara University
  • Showcased his modernist approach and contributed to the development of modern educational facilities in Turkey
• Brought international expertise and influenced the development of modernist architecture in Turkey

Modernist Architecture and Nation-Building

Architecture as a Tool for Nation-Building

• Modernist architecture and urban planning symbolized Turkey's break with its Ottoman past
  • Embraced a modern, secular, and Western-oriented identity
  • Demonstrated the country's commitment to modernization and progress
• Construction of Ankara as the new capital city in the 1920s and 1930s showcased modernist principles
  • Provided an opportunity to demonstrate the country's commitment to modernization and progress
  • Served as a symbol of the new Turkish Republic

Public Buildings and Housing Projects

• Public buildings designed in the modernist style conveyed the values and aspirations of the new Turkish Republic
  • Government offices, universities, and cultural institutions showcased modernist principles
  • Reflected the government's commitment to modernization and social welfare
• Modernist housing projects aimed to provide modern, hygienic, and affordable housing for the growing urban population
  • Saraçoğlu Neighborhood in Ankara (1944-1946) exemplified this approach
  • Intended to reflect the government's commitment to social welfare and modernization

Tensions and Criticisms

• Relationship between modernist architecture and nation-building was not without tensions
  • Some critics argued that the wholesale adoption of Western modernist principles neglected Turkey's unique cultural heritage and local architectural traditions
  • Raised concerns about the loss of cultural identity and the homogenization of the built environment
• Highlighted the challenges of balancing modernization with the preservation of cultural heritage and local traditions

Social Impact of Modernist Urban Planning

Modernist Housing Projects

• Provided modern amenities and improved living conditions for middle-class and upper-middle-class residents
  • Ataköy Housing Development in Istanbul (1957-1962) exemplified this approach
  • Often failed to address the needs of lower-income groups, leading to social inequalities and exclusion
• Created new forms of urban living and social organization
  • Emphasized the separation of residential, commercial, and industrial areas
  • Led to changes in social interactions and community dynamics

Criticisms and Limitations

• Critics argued that modernist urban planning often failed to create vibrant, socially inclusive, and culturally responsive urban environments
  • Led to the emergence of monotonous and sterile cityscapes that lacked a sense of place and community
  • Failed to consider the diverse needs and aspirations of different social groups
• Emphasized automobile-oriented transportation, which often prioritized the needs of car owners over pedestrians and public transportation users
  • Contributed to social inequalities and the marginalization of certain segments of society
  • Led to the development of car-dependent urban sprawl and associated environmental and social challenges

Social and Cultural Impact

• Mixed reception among different segments of Turkish society
  • Some embraced the modern lifestyle and values associated with modernist developments
  • Others felt alienated or marginalized by the changes in urban form and social structure
• Highlighted the complex relationship between modernization, social change, and cultural identity in Turkey
  • Raised questions about the role of architecture and urban planning in shaping social and cultural norms
  • Underscored the need for more inclusive and participatory approaches to urban development that consider the diverse needs and aspirations of different social groups